Not only are these posts still going, there is now (more) original research going on in them deciphering and translating letters in archives that apparently no one has bothered to look at before?? (Which has now conclusively exonerated Fritz's valet/chamberlain Fredersdorf from the charge that he was dismissed because of financial irregularities and died shortly thereafter "ashamed of his lost honor," as Wikipedia would have it. I'M JUST SAYING.)
Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Hugo novellas, part 1 (of presumably 2)
- 2: Hadestown (2nd US tour)
- 3: The Jewish War: Book 7
- 4: (no subject)
- 5: The Jewish War: Last half of book 6
- 6: The Jewish War: First half of Book 6
- 7: The Jewish War: First half of Book 4
- 8: The Jewish War: Last half of book 5
- 9: In Memoriam (Winn)
- 10: The Jewish War: First half of Book 5
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Re: Archive updates
Date: 2023-06-20 03:34 pm (UTC)Re: Archive updates
Date: 2023-06-20 03:46 pm (UTC)Re: Archive updates
Date: 2023-06-21 12:25 am (UTC)January 1749, Peter asks Fritz to reimburse him for the goods belonging to him that were confiscated in Wesel in 1730. Fritz recompenses him by giving him a canonicat in Xanten (which, as we learned earlier in salon, is near Wesel) that has recently become vacant.
In 1755, when Samuel Cocceji (major minister who reformed the Prussian legal system and became the father-in-law of Barberina) died, Fritz put Peter in charge of supervising the work on a marble bust he'd commissioned to commemorate Cocceji.
In mid November 1756, as we know, Peter has a stroke and spends his last weeks arranging his affairs. We have a letter (in French) from Fritz to Peter on December 3, saying formally but warmly that he's sorry to hear the news and hopes Peter recovers, that of course he, Fritz, will grant the favor Peter asked and has given the General Directory his orders, and that it's always a pleasure to have Peter's family under his protection and give them signs of his goodwill.
We also have the letter (in German) to the General Directory, which tells us the favor is exactly what I anticipated: Peter asked if his family could keep living in the Jägerhof after his death, and Fritz said yes. As we know from Lehndorff, but now we know this was something Peter asked for, and not something Fritz and Ariane worked out after Peter's death.
There's also a random letter in German. It's signed by Fritz (the signature matches the Gröben letters), has no date and no recipient, but is in the middle of about 1 dozen letters from Fritz to Peter, but it's the only one in German. I want to do a second pass at the transcription before I say more, but the tone strikes me as markedly more personal. The others, all in French, are formal business letters, usually of the "I need money," "Yes, please wait until it's convenient for me" type that we've seen already.
Re: Archive updates
Date: 2023-06-22 05:48 am (UTC)In either case, it's good Fritz granted it, but in this scenario, it's extra touching - also on a "Peter looking out for his wife and kids" front.
Re: Archive updates
Date: 2023-06-22 03:52 pm (UTC)I will also add that if Peter's letter went out from Berlin on November 30, and Fritz was replying (albeit via secretary) on December 3 in Dresden, that's a pretty quick reply from Fritz. Looks like he didn't put that response off, despite being busy with war
crimes in Saxony.Re: Archive updates
Date: 2023-06-21 12:47 am (UTC)Re: Archive updates
Date: 2023-06-21 01:18 am (UTC)*some time later*
Oh, hey, Leining's signature is showing up on official documents giving Carl Ernst aka Peter Carl jobs.
There's also a genealogy that at least answers one outstanding question I had about the gaps in the other two! Both Formey and the document from the Prussian archive agree that a George Keith married a Stuart, but neither would tell me who. This one tells me it was the daughter of Matthew Stuart, Earl of Lennox.
Beautiful, that's been bugging me since I turned up the eulogy in June of 2020. ;)
Re: Archive updates
Date: 2023-06-22 05:49 am (UTC)And there's an explanation as to why Maupertuis' biography reads so much more drily - his biographers had so much trouble decyphering his letters and only bothered with a few! :)
Re: Archive updates
Date: 2023-06-22 04:54 pm (UTC)I should be fair to Peter, the handwriting's not *that* bad. It's partly a function of me not being fluent in French, and partly a function of the blotches and crossing out and squeezing the new words over the scribbled out words/blotches in between lines. The handwriting per se not nearly as bad as Maupertuis'. :P But unlike Peter's letters to Fritz, I can't eyeball this, and unlike Suhm's letters, I can't even fully sight-read it with concentration. I have to transcribe with lots of Xs, and hope it makes sense when I come back for a second pass.
Whereas with Maupertuis, I'm afraid it will be entirely X's by the time I'm done. :P Peter's is better, though I expect there will still be some Xs if I don't want to spend 30 minutes on single words.
Really, the most useful thing I could do if I want to really do archival research, is take another 1-2 years of studying French and German; so much handwriting is easier if you can immediately think of all the possibilities, than if you have to go character by character.