Muuuuuusic

Dec. 19th, 2024 09:57 am
cahn: (Default)
All the music people around me have been chunking the month in weeks. Get through this week; regroup, learn the music for next week; get through next week. It is December. Last week was the big week; one more week to go, but relatively light. (Which is good, because the Yuletide deadline was Tuesday and this is, uh, the second latest I've ever turned in my draft.)

Me, grading the music I've had to do in the past month: )
cahn: (Default)
Merry Christmas? and happy Yuletide? and happy New Year? As usual for this year, I am way behind, and actually I managed to drop or refuse to play with a number of balls over Christmas -- I think I had a minor case of burnout this year, which I'm sort of bemused by as I had a lot less going on than in previous years. I only had to organize not-all-that-much music for one morning (not two mornings, I did not have to organize the evening music-intensive performance), I didn't have to organize any instrumental rehearsals (Awesome Musical Family Mom: Should we get a bunch of people together to do an instrumental thing? Me: ...I'd be the one coordinating all these rehearsals, wouldn't I. ...no.), we didn't fly anywhere (which, given the weather, I'm rather grateful for). I did a lot of knitting instead of anything any more intensive than that.

Things I did do: Choir conducting, dad's memoirs, skiing )

One more thing I did (a more conventional reveal post here):

This fall I reread The Perilous Gard, a kidlit/YA-ish (Newbery Honor) book from 1974 about a young woman who, in the last days of Mary Tudor's reign, gets sent to an out-of-the-way castle that may or may not be associated with the Fair Folk. This book I adore to little bits and pieces. I love everything about it, although on this reread I was amused to find that I have read the last third or so so many times that I basically have large portions of it memorized, and then the first two-thirds I only remembered rather vaguely. (although I really enjoyed rereading it! It's just that those parts are in a lot of ways setting up the last third, that was and is super iddy for me.) minor spoilers )

All the characters are just wonderful, even the ones who have only very slight appearances. Kate's father shows up for... maybe a few paragraphs?? ...and he is delightful; you can totally see how important he is to Kate, and how important Kate is to him, and how Kate turned out the way she did <3 Sir Geoffrey has a fairly minor part in the story but he's also fully-formed and totally great! And the young future Elizabeth I has a single scene, but I've been imprinted with her and that's how I've thought of young Elizabeth ever since. And I love Alicia too! And as for the Lady, and the worldbuilding of the People Under the Hill, and Kate and Christopher... well, as I said to [personal profile] selenak, I suppose one can't assign to this book all my love of over-the-top all-but-adversarial banter to signify a close/other-self relationship, nor all my love of bowing/kneeling/curtseying to signify things that can't be said in words, but it certainly was, shall we say, formative :D And the fairies here are other enough that I cannot read any current fairy YA these days, all of which seem to have fairies who act mostly like immature adolescents. (looking at you, Holly Black! Sorry!)

I've always loved that Kate gets to save the day, and she gets to save it rather a lot; one of the things that struck me in this reread was how many times Kate's brain saves the day, but not in any way that feels overtly 21st-century (though her father clearly is progressive for his time in the way he teaches her, and Kate clearly is extremely intelligent and thoughtful). There are several things about her that save the day, of course, not just her intelligence -- also her stubbornness, also her ability to value what is real, also her compassion, also her sense of what's right -- but it was interesting to me on this read that it's also in large part her intelligence and extreme dose of common sense, which leads her to realize e.g. that something's wrong with Christopher's story in the beginning, how to find Christopher under the Hill, how to get out near the end.

Another thing I loved was how Kate's and Christopher's rationality complement each other. Kate: as [personal profile] skygiants said in her awesome review, Kate Sutton has no TIME for your manpain. She will call Christopher out every time he's being Super Drama Emo Boy! Which is, admittedly, a lot of times! (also I ABSOLUTELY 100% LOVE that this is (yet another) major quality of hers that saves the day!) But then there's also the part where Christopher will also counter Kate's subconscious assumptions that he's Super Dramatic Romance Knight with things like, but what about worrying about cleaning out the drains!

Basically I love these two a lot. Kate in particular is just really an awesome heroine -- she's so individualistic that I felt it was hard for me to extrapolate what she'd think about a situation that wasn't in the book, which I feel I don't usually have a problem with. With Christopher, I did feel like I had a much better idea how he would respond. he would talk about drainage, probably

This was also the only example in my childhood that I can think of where, in the boy-girl romance, it is the boy who is described as extremely conventionally attractive and not the girl! I also love spoilers )

Also also! one of my favorite lines continues to be the one that Kate thinks about the Guardian of the Well: Questions, thought Kate savagely; why even now couldn't the thing tell a plain lie, like an honest man? (It's a line that comes near the climax of the book, in an incredibly tense scene, and yet it always makes me laugh when I come across it. It's so Kate. Kate is just so great.)
cahn: (Default)
I got released Sunday from my church calling as music coordinator, which I've been doing for four years almost exactly. (I was called a little before Christmas 2018, when my previous ward was split and the half of the ward I was in got combined with our current ward.) I'm having a ton of mixed feelings about this which I am going to inflict on you! instead of doing all the stuff I'm actually supposed to be doing

Cut for lengthy rambling. )
cahn: (Default)
I am hoping that I am now Done with the time-intensive parts of April church, which were a) giving a talk at church (this was very time-consuming, because although I now have deconstructed the process of how to give a very effective talk at church, I have to rehearse a lot and go through a lot of drafts to smooth it out) b) the "Easter concert" that was last night, and c) planning the Easter music for actual Easter.

I honestly don't really understand why people thought doing an Easter concert was a good idea, given that we sort of scraped by on the Christmas concert even though everyone had a good time. But okay. Except that the two stars, whom I guess I have called Operatic Music Guy Tenor and Smooth Music Guy Tenor before, both got super sick (not with covid -- one of them lost his voice and the other had a flareup of long-standing heart issues) and couldn't participate. (Smooth Music Guy Tenor was doing a trio of "Savior, Redeemer" with me on violin and our other friend on piano.) The lady running it is... umm... very intense, and she managed to persuade another of our mutual music-friends to sing in the place of Smooth Music Guy Tenor. The catch here is that the new singer was still in a walker because of a bike accident she had a couple of months back (which is why she hadn't been previously asked to sing). I would have said no! But she didn't say no, except that she couldn't walk to the stand. And then the special mike she had (because she couldn't walk to the stand with the usual mike) malfunctioned so this poor woman was singing unmiked to the entire audience. Fortunately she has a voice that carries pretty well, even if it's not super operatic, and I did a lot of volume modulation so as not to drown her out, but that was exciting. The good part for me is that all my brainpower was going towards how I was going to make sure that I wasn't drowning her out, with none left for being nervous, which usually I would be and which usually makes me play noticeably worse in concert than in rehearsal. But anyway, everyone had a good time and it went just well enough that they'll probably do it again next year, joy.

(The lady running it also sang, and... I... feel that someone needs to tell her that while it was fine ten years ago (the last time I heard her sing), she kind of needs to not sing at these events anymore.) (Hilariously, I'm pretty sure she was not asked for the Christmas concert.)

I am also super pleased that the music drama for this year ended both happily and in a way where I don't have to do anything, lol. So this was unforced error on my part -- I had agreed with Awesome Alto that she would sing "Savior Redeemer" at our ward at Easter and I would accompany her on piano, and then I had suggested the same song to Smooth Music Guy Tenor to sing with me at the fireside without thinking about it at all, and once I did, AAlto objected at doing the same one. Well, she found another song, but couldn't find it in the appropriate key, and there is no way I can transpose music on piano, especially (for me) difficult music like this was. Fortunately, Amazing Organist was just standing around randomly waiting for his wife after church (he's very often traveling for work, so this was doubly fortuitious that he was around this month at all), and I was like "I bet AO can do it, he's right there, let's ask him!" and dragged her over, and AO was like "Oh, I've played this before, and sure, I can't transpose it from the music but I can do it by ear." (I told you he was amazing. Gosh. I can do that on violin but there is NO WAY on piano.) So they rehearsed and now not only are we all set, I also don't have to spend all my spare time learning a new piano piece this week, which as you can imagine I am very excited about ;)

(If you've been following all my vague references, you may well be asking, why didn't Awesome Alto sing "Savior Redeemer" for the fireside? She could only sing it in another key, and this was like a few days beforehand so our pianist, who was not AO, wouldn't have had time to learn in the different key.) (Though I would have preferred it as the violin part is easier in the other key, lol.) And also she wasn't super excited about singing for it so might have just said a flat no anyway.)

...Very fortunately D. is on the ball with regard to, like, buying chocolate and hard-boiling Easter eggs for the kids to color and such, because that was not even on my radar.

Also Hugo nominations are out! I've read the short stories now, starting in on the novelettes, and at some point will Post My Decided Opinions, and have a couple of novels queued from the library. Anyway, She Who Became the Sun and The Last Graduate are on the novel and YA ballots respectively, which is really all I wanted :)
cahn: (Default)
Everyone in my family-of-origin had agreed months ago that going on cross-country plane flights this Christmas was not a good idea (I hate flying at Christmas at the best of times, but we usually suck it up to see family), so instead we'd made plans to hang out with my best friend and her family for the first time in two years and go skiing over winter break to try to reprise a really excellent trip we had right before covid. But sadly a combination of raised omicron risk and weather foxed all those plans (as I know many others' plans have fallen through as well, this year) -- though we did end up going skiing by ourselves for a couple of days before the marked probability of ice on the road in another day forced us out too. I suppose the upside of this is that I'll be around on the 25th to read and comment on Yuletide gifts instead of in a car (the original plan), although as usual for me, it will probably be evening my time before that happens :)

(Skiing was great the first day and somewhat miserable the second day -- we were only out for a couple of hours -- because it was raining the entire time. Although the nice thing was that A. got a ski lesson that second day (we weren't able to book him for one the first day), and he is exactly the right age to learn quickly, and the instructor was excellent.)

Our situation is also significantly better than that of my extended family, who (because my uncle is an extreme optimist, I guess) had planned a family reunion revolving around going skiing in Canada (we had bowed out of that trip quite a few months ago, what with the uncertainty in when vaccines would be available for kids and also international travel uncertainty over Christmas in a pandemic) and just canceled the reunion yesterday. Some of the younger cousins are still talking about going up to use the houses. (I hope my cousin with a one-month-old baby doesn't go up, which the last email mentioned might be the case. Pandemic and risk to child aside -- not to minimize those, but honestly my first reaction was, I think I'd have murdered my husband if he went for a ski vacation most of a week when our first child was a month old.)

Also, here, have some things I wrote almost two weeks ago now (so, before people started getting worried about omicron) but never posted:

-I think I forgot to mention that one of the things that has made December busy was (covid) shots for everyone! (We'd gotten flu shots a month earlier.) Really happy I was able to get a booster at a convenient location (closest pharmacy to our house!) in the morning; kiddos also got their second shots last week at a convenient time for us (and I scheduled it at the pharmacy across the street from our favorite Indian takeout place, so we had some to celebrate). YAY all around. Kiddos also had zero side effects, not even any tenderness at the site, so I'm really really pleased about that. I had pretty severe flu-like chills the evening of, to the point where I was regretting my life choices for about ten minutes before I managed to fall asleep. I might even have avoided or at least been unconscious for the chills had I gone to bed when I actually started feeling tired like a smart person, or at least snagged an ibuprofen on my way to bed, but, well. The next day I felt similarly to how I felt after my second shot -- approximately how I feel when I have a reasonably bad cold. I felt more tired and less brainless than after the second shot -- it actually felt a bit less like feeling actively sick and more like my body had been through something that it now needed to rest from.

-I gave E Elatsoe to read and she really liked it! Score! The way Elatsoe codes as much younger than her canon age was a plus for E., and she also didn't mind (somewhat to my surprise) the interludes that didn't necessarily contribute to the through-line plot. (I also ended up moving Elatsoe much higher on my Lodestar voting list as a result -- to #2. I realized the only other books I would give E to read of this set were Raybearer, later, and Deadly Education, much later.)

-Everyone at church has been SUPER nice about my annoying and chivvying music emails. Music Guy (henceforth to be called Music Guy Baritone), after the third email where I was attempting to re-schedule his family (in this third case because I didn't understand his previous email, but we cleared that up) sent me a lovely note where he thanked me for organizing everything and how difficult he knew it was. Man, you know, my ward has tensions sometimes but overall does NOT do church politics well, everyone just is WAY too nice for that <3333333 (I also think our structure of callings, by which everyone plays musical chairs with different callings every few years, contributes -- Music Guy noted in his email that he'd had to be the music director before, so he knew how hard it can be, and it's much easier in general to be patient with someone else's failings when you've done that same job and know how tough it is!)

-Then there was the screwball comedy-like communications fail where I thought the kids' program had volunteered to sing without telling me, while they thought I was telling them to sing. It all worked itself out and now everyone thinks it's hilarious but wow self, next time up your communications game.

-That stake event where we did not have a choir to offer up? NO ONE had a choir, it turns out, for the obvious reasons. The only choir number was from a group from... the local Unitarian church?? (*) I find this utterly hilarious. (Also super weird! For another church it would not be weird, but my church is... usually very not good at playing well with others in our own space. I blame the stake music director for playing well with others!) Also there was the six-member group (the only actual group from my church more than three people) I managed to rustle up from my ward, where all were vaccinated and one member helpfully offered up the name "Safe Sextet." (...We did not go with that.) So Music Guy Baritone and Operatic Music Guy Tenor (who moved into the other ward, traitor!! Only I can't call him that because he very super nicely -- have I mentioned everyone is super nice -- helped out when we were going to be short a tenor) both did several numbers either solo or together, plus a couple of numbers with Smooth Music Guy Tenor (whose voice I am in love with and who ALSO moved into the other ward). But it all went super well and Awesome Organist Guy played the organ and everyone was so happy and, I mean, Music Guy Baritone and Operatic Music Guy Tenor and Smooth Music Guy Tenor are all completely excellent so no one was actually opposed to listening to a program that was all them.

-but I am very very happy to be past that particular event, I think actually last week was the big week rehearsal-wise and now we've rehearsed almost everything, yay, and HOW GLAD are all of the music people that we don't have a ward fireside/evening music program on top of all of this? SO GLAD

-how am I dealing with all of this? yes, by writing more (short) Yuletide fic and kind of feeling amused at the process by which I'm like "yeah, that prompt is great and I want to read it and definitely not able to write that myself" to "...but what if..." Also, betas are the best!

(*) Since I wrote this, I found out that it is the local Unity church, which is distinct from Unitarian, which I actually did not know before last week!
cahn: (Default)
Me: Now that it's mid-November, I've finally got the church Christmas program sorted and I can start catching up on other stuff, like DW and my Yuletide fic and beta --

Bishopric: Hey, just wanted to call and catch up on Christmas music and mention two things. First, the stake is holding a Christmas music celebration and is asking if our ward choir can participate.

Me: ???? This sounds... like not the best idea our stake has ever had...
...But anyway, a month ago when I asked what the guidance was on choirs, the bishop told me choirs were only possible masked and distanced (which I think is great) and I asked around and literally no one I talked to wanted to have choir under those restrictions. So we don't HAVE a choir. But we do have a small group of vaccinated people who were going to sing something and I guess I could ask them...

Bishopric: Cool, sounds legit! Also the First Presidency [global Church leaders; as you probably know this is an extremely hierarchical church, so this would be sort of like the Pope and the Vatican, I guess, except that people actually do what the First Presidency says, for the most part] this week was encouraging people to have Christmas programs on Dec 26. Not Dec 19, which is when you've planned everything for.

Me: ... okay. I guess... I'll ask everyone if they can do that.
[I should say that Bishopric guy was extremely apologetic! Totally not his fault, but gah.]

Bishopric: One last thing, we've historically had this Christmas ward musical fireside thing, do you think we should do that again now that we also have this stake music thing?

Me, remembering the multiple conversations I had in 2019 with other musicians saying "...don't you think this is all a bit much, we are all super stretched thin??": You know what, I'm super going to go with "no" on this one. If people complain bitterly we can tell them it was because of the pandemic (not even false, I was assuming we weren't going to have it this year because of the pandemic).

So last night (and part of tonight) instead of doing fun stuff I emailed/texted everyone involved, and I think got back that most people are going to be able to do stuff on Dec 26? Including the person who I wasn't sure was due to have a baby Dec 26 or Jan 2, but it turns out it's Jan 2 and so as long as she's support/coach and not directly performing, it seems like it will all be okay unless she goes into labor that day which she thinks is unlikely :) There might be minor drama with one person which hopefully will be easily fixed if everyone else is reasonable. Crossing my fingers on that one -- of the four people involved in the conversation, two of them I am super confident will be super reasonable, and then there is a small but nontrivial chance that Fourth Person will be unreasonable in the opposite direction. But aaaaaaah! (ETA: Fourth Person has responded entirely reasonably, YAY)

But at least I will probably not have to do anything for a ward musical fireside!
cahn: (Default)
Things I have done this week, a partial list:
-prepped a zoom lesson for Relief Society (the women's organization), the prep of which took rather less time than the scripture-based class I used to teach, because I had to do research for that one, but prep for RS classes mostly consists of coming up with meaty questions that everyone else can chew on and discuss
-actually gave the zoom lesson, which went pretty well except that our wireless went out ten minutes beforehand, which meant I did the entire thing from my phone, and thank goodness I didn't also have to deal with letting people in the room and so on (another woman did that)
-signed A. up for outside masked summer camp
-made an Easter music video with the kids, which took about seven takes
-UPLOADED the music video with the kids, which took longer than making it
-filled easter eggs with nice notes to the kids about things I liked about them, to be hidden by D
-wrote at least some DW comments
-one load of laundry

Things I have not done:
-figured out church music for April, omg, I need to do this TOMORROW
-sign A. up for the one camp that opened registration on Friday, which means all the spots are probably taken now
-write about Orieux's Voltaire bio for either salon or a DW post
-the other two loads of laundry that need to be done
cahn: (Default)
Today was the second funeral in so many days I have "been" to, both of people I knew from church. (Neither were covid-19 related. At least as far as I know -- I suppose one might have been secondary effects, who knows these days.)

Read more... )

Anyway, it's been, as a ward member said on a mailing list I'm on, a pretty emotional week for our ward family.

And tomorrow is the Zoom remembrance event for my super awesome high school physics teacher, one of the best teachers I've ever had. (He died in late 2020.) He was amazing and anything I say about physics pedagogy I probably learned from him.

I'm... kind of hoping really hard that there aren't any more funerals for me to attend anytime soon, please.
cahn: (Default)
-State of Christmas music: who even knows. I feel like as it has turned out there are a lot of moving parts that I'm unconvinced will all come together, but if it does, I think I have an outdoor instrumental program that lets people have a bit of some reasonably competent Christmas music while doing our best not to put anyone at risk? If our family or the other musical family in the ward turns out to have to quarantine during that time, maybe I don't have a program? As for the video part, I have pretty much given up on that, I have sent a lot of harassing emails and now it's up to them, I'll make a little video with the kids and everyone else can just make a little video or not, and anyone who does will post them to the ward Facebook page. What we really needed was someone who would string all the videos together so we could have a group watching experience, and no one including me was willing to do that. (This is also So Not My Job. This is the job I said no to last year when it was in person and *less* work.) But, like. What are they going to do, fire me? (...which... I would super not mind, except that it would probably mean being slotted into another calling that required more work or at least more work I was unsuited for. :) )

-State of Yuletide: ahahaha. I laugh. Honestly it is overall pretty low stress because this year I am writing short fun things and not trying to figure out ambitious or long ideas. But now I have somehow been sucked into helping out with a rather ambitious idea, so I am actually spending quite a bit more time than I'd anticipated on that. On the other hand, it is not my ambitious idea, so I don't actually have to be stressed about it. :) I'm really invested now, but it's great for me because I can do mostly the fun parts, lol.

-bonus bullet point: A chance remark online got me googling reusable menstrual pads, omg I was skeptical at first but I love these things so much, the best thing I've bought all year. I am using primarily ones from Tree Hugger Cloth Pads from Canada which, have I mentioned, are so great. I'll do a proper better review of them later... probably in January. But I have now finished my first month of using solely cloth pads and I am so happy.
cahn: (Default)
OH THANK GOD

https://www.ksl.com/article/46524616/church-to-allow-baptisms-blessings-for-children-of-lgbt-parents-updates-handbook-regarding-apostasy

I wrote about this (denying baptisms and blessings to children of LGBT parents, and considering same-sex marriages as apostasy) a little here. I have been very strongly opposed to this policy. While I don't agree with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints' stance on gay relationships in general, I understand why it is a natural consequence of the church's current theology. But this policy, I believe, was both incoherent with church theology and against scripture, in addition to it just being wrong. I almost left the church over it, and although I didn't end up doing so, I have only been active on the ward and stake level since then and have not contributed to the church as an institution.

I'm so, so glad they've walked this back.
cahn: (Default)
In November, I fell headfirst into falling desperately in love with the Book of Mormon musical.

I really wasn't expecting it to work in quite that way? I hadn't even ever watched it, although I've listened to the cast recording about a billion times, and am kind of desperately in love with parts of that, and I'd watched clips on YouTube. Cut for length. Lots of discussion of religion, at least tangentially. )
cahn: (Default)
So, at church I have an unofficial calling (as of last month) and (as of this morning) an official calling now! The unofficial calling is "music coordinator for the church Christmas music fireside," which people who have been around for several years might remember I did several years ago and it was a mess -- it is way less of a mess this year, thankfully -- and the official calling is "ward music chairman," which mostly means I wave my arms around on Sunday (this person also functions as the chorister) but might also mean I need to be involved in the morning church Christmas program.

Anyway, my December in numbers:

Number of church Christmas music events I have successfully completed: 1
Number of church Christmas music events yet to be completed: 3
Number of rehearsals I had for entirely different pieces with separate groups of people this weekend: 4
Number of times I am going to be performing in some capacity at the church Christmas music fireside next weekend: 4
Number of people who apparently wanted to perform "O Holy Night" at the fireside but did not tell me: 4
Number of people who actually did tell me she wanted to perform "O Holy Night": 1
Number of pieces that have been definitively planned for the morning church Christmas program: 0 (choir director and I are going to have a Talk tomorrow)
Number of people who are causing ~DRAMA~ in regards to the fireside: 0 (HUGE improvement over last time I had to do this)
Number of Yuletide fics I should probably be writing: 0
Number of Yuletide fics I am in fact writing: 2
Number of words I need to write in the next week while I'm also figuring out all the music stuff: ~1000
Number of words I could probably have written in the time it took me to write this: 100 (this fic is going kinda slowly)
cahn: (Default)
Well. Sunday was interesting. Not in a bad way, indeed in what will ultimately, I think, be a good and happy way, but in an unexpectedly bittersweet and emotional way.

Church stuff. )
cahn: (Default)
All right, I don't really want to talk about politics here and I hope not to make any more posts about politics (and I'll probably f-lock this one eventually), but I'll just make this post because I thought a couple of you might find it interesting.

K/B asked me two weeks ago about the LDS Church and whether it would ever come out against Trump. I said (and still say) no. The Church did not even endorse Mitt Romney in 2012, who was one of our own.

There are two reasons for this. The first is that the LDS religion believes very, very strongly in freedom of religion and the related freedom to vote our own consciences. Our theology in fact explicitly postulates that the founders of this country were motivated by the Spirit of the Lord to develop a country in which these freedoms are possible. The second, more cynical reason, is that the LDS Church will never, ever do anything to call into question its nonprofit tax-exempt status as a religion, and making statements about any political candidate or party would put itself squarely in that bullseye.

(I believe both. If it weren't for the second reason, I absolutely believe that the Church would be tempted to speak out more. I could also imagine that if it weren't for the first reason, the Church might be tempted to do at least wink-wink-nudge-nudge kinds of statements, which I've heard from the pulpit in my sister-in-law's evangelical church and which I found horrifying.)

The Church has put out a single official statement on, not Trump, but in response to Trump's call to ban Muslims from entering the United States. It did not name Trump. It basically went, "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is neutral in regard to party politics and election campaigns. However, it is not neutral in relation to religious freedom," and a couple of relevant quotes from Joseph Smith. The Deseret News (of which more later) was happy to unpack what they actually meant, though.

Utah is still red, I told K/B, but usually the LDS church votes Republican as an extremely reliable bloc [not wholly, especially those in California and Massachusetts, haha, but… pretty strongly so], and in this election that bloc no longer holds.

Then that tape came out.

The Church has not said anything officially about it, I think rightly so (see above).

Last Saturday, the Deseret News wrote a very strongly-worded editorial against Trump. (It declined to go so far as to endorse Clinton.)

And now Mormons have pretty much broken against Trump.

I've seen a couple of articles about the Mormon revolt against Trump in the last several days, but I don't think I've seen anywhere talk about exactly how important the Deseret News editorial was in the confluence of the LDS Church and politics. The Deseret News is owned by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. It is not an official Church publication. It says it is not a mouthpiece for the Church. However, in the past it used to be exactly that. It still has a great deal of power and does in fact in the minds of many Mormons speak for the Church. Last week when I was at church, in fact, people (including me) were confused as to whether the Deseret News was an official Church publication or not. (This was in a completely unrelated, religion-based context, and I had not yet seen the Trump editorial because I am not the sort of LDS person who reads the Deseret News. But there are people in my ward (in California) who read it every day.)

Anyway, probably partially because of this background and the possibility of confusion, The Deseret News has not taken a stand for/against a political candidate in 80 years. But they have done so now. And it is a huge deal in LDS circles. It doesn't carry the weight of an official pronouncement, and certainly should not; but there are a lot of people in the LDS Church who will give it a lot of weight. There were already a lot of LDS who disliked Trump (that's a whole other story; Trump's brand of demagoguery is basically antithetical to Mormons -- ETA 10-14: for example see this Buzzfeed article written by a Mormon reporter) but might have pushed the lever for him out of not knowing that much about him combined with conservative solidarity; but this, I think, will have given them another path, and what's more, a path that at least appears to come with tacit approval of the leaders of the Church. (The editor of the Deseret News claims he did not run the editorial by any Church leaders, and I have no reason not to believe him. But people will assume that he did anyway, or at the very least — and I also believe this — that his beliefs are shared by church leadership.) I've already seen the editorial be passed around and convince a couple of previous Trump supporters on an LDS message board I occasionally look at.

(There's also a whole other post I could make about LDS theology and women and how Trump hit that in a way that was pretty much guaranteed backlash, but this is already enough, so never mind.)

(And I should also add that I don't think the Deseret Times affected the Mormon politician exodus from Trump which has also been happening; that seems to have happened independently (though for the same reasons that the editorial came out, see also LDS theology and women), and of course Mitt Romney has been the lone voice crying in the wilderness that is Republican politics for some time. What I'm talking about here has been more important for those people who haven't been following the political scene super closely.)

And today (er, yesterday now) a poll came out showing Trump and Clinton tied (with Evan McMullins' numbers shooting up stratospherically — he's an independent LDS candidate) in Utah. Utah. Maybe the poll is skewed, maybe it isn't quite right, maybe it's biased. But… I don't think it's that far wrong. I think, I really think, we're going to see Utah in play. It might not go for Clinton (I will laugh if McMullins wins Utah; I think he actually has a decent shot), but I think it is going to be close. This is something I never thought we'd see in my lifetime. And of course Mormons make up a small but decisive couple of percent in Arizona, which was balanced on the razor-edge before last weekend but now is turning…

ETA 10-14: Yesterday another, better poll came out which still shows Trump ahead in the state, but only by +6, which is still catastrophic for him compared to last week.
cahn: (Default)
And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married… And the anger of the Lord was kindled against them… behold, Miriam became leprous… And the Lord said… let [Miriam] be shut out from the camp seven days, and after that let her be received in again.

Numbers 12:1-14 (excerpts)


Scriptural exegesis and doctrinal discussion. Er, through fic. )
cahn: (Default)
I was surprised by how many people wanted to know about our new bishop! I'll probably f-lock this after a week or so, for what I think should be obvious reasons. Also, I tried to give some background on LDS structure/theology/terminology, but I've also elided in a bunch of places to make this a more-or-less manageable length; please ask questions if there's anything that you'd like more information about.

First, let me give some background: an LDS ward (congregation) is headed by a bishop, aided by two counselors. The bishop is in the same role as a pastor or minister in a more conventional Christian church, in terms of being the head of pastoral care of the ward, although he does not generally give sermons. (LDS chapel services feature talks given by members of the congregation.) All these positions are lay positions; they are unpaid, and performed by these men (they're always men) in addition to whatever jobs they may have. The bishop is "called" (appointed) by the next level up in the hierarchy, the stake presidency (again, a leader with two counselors; a stake is a collection of wards). It is a rotating position, as all ward-level positions are; the same man who is a bishop today might be a nursery leader next week, or a chorister. (In practice this does not happen all that often, but it does happen.) The bishop position, in particular, lasts approximately five years, give or take a year or two.

There have been plenty of cases of bad bishops, but I've been lucky enough never to have personally experienced one. All the ones I've known have been legitimately invested in helping their people. None of my bishops have given me grief about my, let's say, complicated relationship with faith (which is something I understand has happened to other people); in fact, they've all been really understanding about it.

Our previous and current bishops. )

I now find that I want to talk about something I have kind of avoided mentioning, which is the recent LDS Handbook changes. Cut for length and discussion of a policy I find offensive. )
cahn: (Default)
I subbed in and taught the Sunbeams (3-and-4-year-olds) last Sunday (including E). This is the first Sunday School class, the one they go into right after nursery. At this age they're expected to learn to sit in chairs, listen to a lesson, answer questions posed to them by a teacher (I'm not talking calculus here, questions on the order of "Do you have brothers and sisters?") and be involved in group participation in general.

...I think my church is wildly overoptimistic. Or, okay, not wildly: four of the five kids in my class were okay with most of this. It... only takes one kid who doesn't buy into any of it to wreck the entire thing. (There's always the sigh of relief of This Time Not My Kid.) Fortunately, there was another adult in the class (she was not supposed to be there, but she got home early from vacation) to help deal, and to take the kids when others of them had to go to the bathroom, and help with supervising the washing of hands before snack. I mean, preschool teachers must deal with this all the time! The teacher who just got released dealt with them every week! (After this week, I have revised my opinion of her, by the way, from Excellent Sunbeam Teacher We Will All Sorely Miss to Possibly a Goddess in Disguise.) I myself have not acquired the essential multi-kid classroom coping skills.

Two of the kids answered the questions of "How many brothers do you have? How many sisters?" claiming way more siblings than they in fact possessed. A third kid answered almost every question with "ORCS!" sometimes adding "Azog!"

They did all (even orc-child) really enjoy, if not the actual story of Moses and Miriam, the accompanying picture (a tip I'd gotten from Previous Sunbeam Teacher), looking for the baby in the bulrushes (actual quote from my lesson: "No, it is not generally okay to put your baby brother in a basket and put the basket in the river.") and looking for Miriam hiding off to the side. The concentration-style game I tried to play with them started well but turned out as a failure when the fifth child decided he wanted to turn over alllll the cards to find his match.

If they come out of this recognizing the name "Moses" (which none of them did at the beginning), I'll count the lesson a success.
cahn: (Default)
[personal profile] seekingferret asked what we were doing/planning for E's religious education. (Warning: I expect this will be a somewhat unsatisfying answer, not least because I feel like every step brings up more questions, and I can't write forever.)

This is really (at least) a two-part question. The first part is the question: what are we doing with her religious education given my tortured relationship with faith? The second is the question: what are we doing given that I am LDS and D is Lutheran?

To partially answer the second question: E goes to two churches on Sundays. She goes to D's church with both of us at 8am for a one-hour service. Then she sometimes directly goes with me to my church (for 3 hours, often 4 when there is choir practice) and sometimes goes to Sunday School at D's church (where she is the only member of her class) and then goes to my church (where she is one of about seven children in nursery, and one of four in her year starting "Primary" (kid Sunday School) this year). (This year, my ward is starting at 1pm, and then she will go to both every week.) The vast majority of our social circle is LDS with a couple of Lutheran couples sprinkled in. All of her church agemates, as you may have been able to figure out from the above, are LDS. (There are several reasons for this. Demographics of the Lutheran church we attend are, um, heavily skewed towards older folks. Demographics of LDS always include loooots of kids. But also, I'm the one who does much of the social planning, and I'm quite frankly more comfortable with LDS folks than with Lutheran folks, simply because I grew up with them and understand them, and I understand much better how to navigate socially in the LDS world than in the Lutheran world.)

We'll keep doing this as long as we can. My expectation is that conflicts will be resolved on the LDS side, since a) I tend to be the one who is more committed to regular attendance/participation, and b) all her friends are there. But if she decides she will be committed to being a faithful Lutheran, I will honor that. (The big thing that I foresee at this point that could turn her towards Lutheranism is that she thinks her dad hung the moon. Also that theologically I have many fewer problems with Lutheranism than D has with Mormonism. And that he has fewer theological problems with Lutheranism than I do with Mormonism, for that matter.)

The first question: At this point, I tend not to talk that much explicitly about God, Jesus, and so on, except as it naturally comes up (which it does because of the 5 hrs of church/week, things church friends say, the fact that her nanny is LDS, etc.), and then of course I punted hard with the introducing her to death (though that of course was a relatively small part of her life). This is also how I was raised, for different though related reasons. We do have nightly prayer but not nightly scripture reading (which I did when she was very small, stopped for no good reason, and need to get back to).

I have made the conscious choice not to introduce any concept as "because God said we need to do it this way," because I really don't like it. (I consider as distinct the concept of "God has asked us to do this because this helps us become closer to God," which I think is perfectly fine.) I talk to her about caring about other people, and how we do acts of service because we care about other people, and how it is good to be nice to and care about other people even if we don't know them personally, and when she gets a little older we'll connect that to helping us become closer to God, but not explicitly because God says to do so.

Random recent occurrence to illustrate the heretical beliefs she's growing up with: I very much do not believe that God is angry with us when we sin, and informed both E and D of this fact in perhaps a very emphatic tone of voice when her (Lutheran) Sunday School class did David and Bathsheba (which, by the way, was hilarious, the way they tried to explain it on a kid level). (This is straight from some parenting book or other. Frustrated that the kid isn't doing what's best, sad, fearful for the kid's safety, even annoyed -- this I buy. That it may even appear to us as anger, okay. But anger is a secondary emotion arising from these, and I say that if I as an extremely imperfect parent am trying to disentangle all this, God should be past that.)

(...did I answer the intended question at all?)
cahn: (Default)
Okay, I have something to confess, which is that I enjoy talking about music drama. Because it is dramatic! (And because my life doesn't have that much of interpersonal drama otherwise, so I have to import it. Which I am perfectly fine with! I am not into interpersonal drama!)

But I am afraid that I'm leaving you guys with a terribly inaccurate portrayal of my ward, which basically had maybe three people generating all the drama, and honestly all three of those people are also really super nice as well, just with slightly different ideas. So let me tell you about all the nice things/people that happened to me this week alone, in planning this fireside:

1. The friend that I complained to about not having enough musical numbers for the fireside, who despite being super busy with family and work (he's a caterer, so this is his busy season) and family visiting, organized a quartet with another family by ONE HOUR LATER and all four of them have learned a completely new song for it

2. The woman who was at the root of much of the drama last year came to me and said that she wanted things to be good between us and that she was trying to work on not wanting to be in control of everything, and my gosh, this kind of thing never happens except in movies, you really have to be a big person to back out of a situation like that, I hope that I can be that gracious when I'm the one who needs to back out

3. The pianist with three kids, one of whom has ASD, who has cheerfully accepted everything I have piled on her (and I have piled a LOT on her)

4. The corporate chief administrative officer who has also cheerfully accepted all the piano assignments I have thrown at him, and I am pretty sure took off work for at least one rehearsal

5. The mom who is visiting our ward for only six months but nevertheless has cheerfully volunteered for everything, including running the Christmas party (a separate event in which I was not involved that happened last week, but let me assure you it was a LOT of work) and learning a random new song for the fireside, all this while having two kids under the age of 5 and being hugely pregnant with a third

6. The corporate CEO who when I asked him to perform at the fireside last week immediately was jazzed about singing a song with his kids

7. The mom who has four kids, the youngest being 1, and has a sister visiting, and who immediately accepted planning a trio and who also took dinner to the family that just had twins last night

8. The grandmother with the gorgeous voice whom I saw at rehearsal at 8:45pm one evening for one fireside number and whom I saw again the next morning at another rehearsal, for a different song, at 9am

9. The other people -- I have not talked about everyone in this post by a long shot -- who have been nothing but helpful and enthusiastic and interested and willing to pour their time and energy into making this thing happen

10. And, I mean, this is just one event I'm involved in, you know? There was also the Christmas party I referred to earlier, and the women's party, and the church service tomorrow, and all the other things that happen during the year, and all the music things, for that matter, and all the other families that need dinner taken to them or help with moving or emotional support or what have you. And there are always people willing to help, indeed, enthusiastic about helping. They humble me every time I think about them.

MY WARD, you guys. THEY ARE THE BEST.
cahn: (Default)
This Sunday I have to give a talk on Agency in the Plan of Salvation. Agency, here, means the capacity to act, to make choices. It's kind of a cornerstone of LDS theology, and even an essential part of our creation mythology (I'll explain that in a sec), that we are able to act for ourselves, that we act with responsibility and accountability, that we choose between good and evil.

So I've been having some scattered thoughts. Lois McMaster Bujold / Memory, LDS mythology, giving small children choices, the ubiquity (or not) of choices )

Profile

cahn: (Default)
cahn

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 02:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios