Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: The Jewish War: Last half of book 5
- 2: In Memoriam (Winn)
- 3: The Jewish War: First half of Book 5
- 4: The Jewish War: Second half of Book 4
- 5: We Didn't Start the Fire (in the 18th century)
- 6: The Jewish War: First half of Book 4
- 7: (no subject)
- 8: The Jewish War: Book 3
- 9: The Jewish War: Second half of Book 2
- 10: The Jewish War: First half of Book 2
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Re: A Marwitz question for the Rheinsberg salon
Date: 2020-05-04 08:55 am (UTC)- Page! Marwitz. No first name given by either Fritz in his letters or Lehndorff in his diary entry
- Quatermaster!(in the 7 Years War) Marwitz: No first name given, but a year of birth, which would make him 23 at the time of the Heinrich/Fritz/Page Story, which is quite old for a page, and also would make him older than both Heinrich and Lehndorff, making it odd that Lehndorff refers to him as "Young" Marwitz. Also given: a year of death, 1759, in the inscription honoring him on the Rheinsberg Obelisk erected by Heinrich. Ziebura thinks he's identical with Marwitz the page anyway. Whom he definitely CANNOT be identical with, however is:
- famous "where obedience did not bring Honor" Marwitz whom you just linked. That Marwitz resurvived the 7 Years War and died years later, so he's definitely not Obelisk!Marwitz. He, too, could technically have been Page!Marwitz, but the problem here is again he, too would have been old for a page in 1746, and also we have his careeer detailed, and it doesn't include "served as page and then as guard for the King in 1746".
The castle this last Marwitz refused to sack was Hubertusburg, one of the famous and beautiful Saxon palaces, and no, Heinrich had nothing to do with that. The order came from Fritz. Supposedly in retaliation for the plundering of Charlottenburg. The guy who did sack Hubertusburg when Famous!Marwitz refused (according to the story) was a Fritz fave named Lentulus. (Btw: that Lentulus sacked Hubertusburg is not under dispute, that part is historical certainty.) About whom British envoy Andrew Mitchell has nothing good to say a few years later:
The King of Prussia, making a sort of mystery of the person or persons he intends to send to Petersbourg, had demanded of me blank passports, which I have granted; it may, therefore, be necessary to apprize you of the persons I have heard named for that com mission. The first is Baron Goltz, a young gentleman of a fair character, and well spoke of by every body; I am acquainted with him, and have given him a letter for you, in case he should be named. The second is Major-General Lentulus (formerly in the Austrian service), a tall, handsome Swiss, very weak, very vain, and very indiscreet, but, which is worst of all, a servile flatterer, and capable of reporting to his master the greatest falsehoods, if he thinks they will please him. Of this I had the strongest proofs, when, in the year 1756, Lentulus was sent to England, to give an account of the battle of Lobositz (at which he was not present).
On his return into Saxony, he made a most absurd report to the King, his master, concerning the then state of affairs in England, which, after many months labour and infinite pains, I had at last the good fortune totally to annihilate. - Since that time I have done everything in my power to prevent his making a second journey to England, because I thought it of importance to have honest and fair men named for that commission. As to the General's military qualifications, if you will believe his own story, he is the hero of the army; but, unhappily, the army are of a very different opinion. He has indeed distinguished himself by plundering in Saxony, and was lately in disgrace with the King his master, but recovered ground again by the irresistible power of abject flattery, more fatal to kings than daggers and poison.
In a typical irony, Hubertusburg (cleaned out and ramsacked) ended up the Location where the Austrian/Prussian peace negotiations were concluded. Hence "Peace of Hubertusburg").
Re: A Marwitz question for the Rheinsberg salon
Date: 2020-05-04 09:06 am (UTC)This fandom, I swear. Why does everyone have the same name? (I know why.) :P
Re: A Marwitz question for the Rheinsberg salon
Date: 2020-05-04 11:06 am (UTC)Glad to see the salon is flourishing and as active as ever! Sending my love, as always ♥
Re: A Marwitz question for the Rheinsberg salon
Date: 2020-05-06 09:08 pm (UTC)Re: A Marwitz question for the Rheinsberg salon
Date: 2020-05-06 09:21 pm (UTC)