Last post, along with the usual 18th-century suspects, included the Ottonians; changing ideas of conception and women's sexual pleasure; Isabella of Parma (the one who fell in love, and vice versa, with her husband's sister); Henry IV and Bertha (and Henry's second wife divorcing him for "unspeakable sexual acts"). (Okay, Isabella of Parma was 18th century.)
Re: Fritzian Dawn according to Le Diable
Date: 2022-12-05 12:15 am (UTC)Formey in his write up of Manteuffel says Old Dessauer (who disliked him of old) scored a point with Fritz by saying how ridiculous it looked for a prince at Fritz' age to still need a teacher to guide him.
Re what Old Dessauer said, I imagine that it was OD + FW shoving "all military, all the time" down Fritz's throat, and Fritz paying lip service to their faces while sneaking around behind their backs (which FW knew full well).
It might be conjecture, or blame-shifting. I'm sure Manteuffel wants an evil advisor to point the finger at. Obviously Fritz didn't fall out with him because of anything *he* did! But there might have been intrigues as well.
Re: Fritzian Dawn according to Le Diable
Date: 2022-12-05 07:37 am (UTC)It might be worth (but also a headache, because the font was awful there as well) to look into that early Seckendorff biography again, because the Seckendorff biographer kept going on about how Prince Moustache was THE WORST and always feuding with the valiant subject of said biography, so he might have picked up such a story as well.
Re: Fritzian Dawn according to Le Diable
Date: 2022-12-05 01:20 pm (UTC)