Last post, we had (among other things) Danish kings and their favorites; Louis XIV and Philippe d'Orléans; reviews of a very shippy book about Katte, a bad Jacobite novel, and a great book about clothing; a fic about Émilie du Châtelet and Voltaire; and a review of a set of entertaining Youtube history videos about Frederick the Great.
Re: Charles Hanbury-Williams Tells It All: I
Date: 2023-03-18 06:29 pm (UTC)I am so amused by this description of Voltaire's betaing!
Me too, and it reminds me again of one of the anecdote collectors (or maybe a biographer? both?) said that surely, Voltaire invented or at least majorly exaggarated having to beta Fritzian writings, surely he only beta'd once or twice, if ever, and well, we actually have a scan of a Voltaire beta'd Fritz page online somewhere. He beta'd, alright.
Aw, Voltaire and Fritz! "Fritz is a pain and I hate betaing his stuff, but at least he doesn't write about witch hunting!"
Yep, that's why I included this. Chesterfield wrote to H-W: "Why are not all Kings authors? It would keep them at least so long, as they say of children at school, out of harm#s way. I have read with great attention the works of our great James the First, and am convinced that if he had not been so bad an author, he would have been a much worse King. He contended himself with talking and writing, justly conscious of his ability in each; whereas his son, who thought exactly like him and not one jot better, would be doing truly; and we all know what he did. (