Last post, along with the usual 18th-century suspects, included the Ottonians; changing ideas of conception and women's sexual pleasure; Isabella of Parma (the one who fell in love, and vice versa, with her husband's sister); Henry IV and Bertha (and Henry's second wife divorcing him for "unspeakable sexual acts"). (Okay, Isabella of Parma was 18th century.)
Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 05:00 pm (UTC)Three guesses anyone?
Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 05:03 pm (UTC)Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 05:07 pm (UTC)Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 05:12 pm (UTC)Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 05:23 pm (UTC)Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 05:38 pm (UTC)I will stand by "He begins openly appearing in public with a man who is, quite clearly I think, his lover and [he] treats him as such" as as close to factually correct as you can get in a claim about an 18th century homosexual relationship, and "one of his great loves" as arguable, at least not egregiously wrong, and the Duhan letter as an obscure salon factoid. ;)
But WOW some of these other claims.
Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 05:52 pm (UTC)Just kidding. I completely agree with you, and not just because of that gigantic Fritz financed tomb. For that matter, even the Marquis D'Argens inspired rant by Nicolai re: how no one but the Marquis was worthy among the Sanssouci Table Round notes that Algarotti meant a lot to Fritz.
Lady Mary: Of course he loved Algarotti! How could anyone not have Algarotti as their great love, is what I want to know.
Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 05:56 pm (UTC)Mobster!AU author beat me to it! She actually made Algarotti the one true long-lasting love of his life, Fredersdorf who? :P
I completely agree with you, and not just because of that gigantic Fritz financed tomb.
Yeah, Maupertuis got one too, right? But Algarotti got an orgasm poem, that I don't think Maupertuis or Duhan did. :PPP
Lady Mary: Of course he loved Algarotti! How could anyone not have Algarotti as their great love, is what I want to know.
</3
Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 06:00 pm (UTC)Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 06:02 pm (UTC)Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 07:11 pm (UTC)Fancast: Liam Neeson?
Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 08:36 pm (UTC)Also has a tragic backstory! (I think that was before the Seven Years War, right?)
Mitchell backstory
From:Re: Mitchell backstory
From:Re: Mitchell backstory
From:Re: Mitchell backstory
From:Re: Mitchell backstory
From:Re: Mitchell backstory
From:Re: Mitchell backstory
From:Re: Mitchell backstory
From:Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 09:04 pm (UTC)Of course, we all know I'm not writing anything this year (I got 4 hours of sleep last night and have now been awake for 21 hours), but who can know what next year holds! I have this idea that maybe, someday, I'll be able to read Germany comfortably and then I can let my brain focus on other things.
Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 09:50 pm (UTC)He does sound potentially dishy! Would read the fic. : D
Andrew Mitchell
From:Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 05:33 pm (UTC)I mean, I'm with them so far on that, but the letter thing is not great proof, yeah. But at least that's understandable and probably hasn't come up in a skit. ;)
Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 05:23 pm (UTC)Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 06:45 pm (UTC)Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 08:29 pm (UTC)Yes? Considering that until now, Fritz couldn't have the people he wanted around him, Keyserlingk was having to meet him incognito as late as 1740, and we all know that having the people he wanted around him was one of THE most important things to Fritz...I would say he was celebrating by publicly having Algarotti accompany him, yes.
making it sound much more deliberate and official and public than it was
I concede that you've listened to this and I haven't, but given the passage you've quoted, the "quite clearly I think" says to me that they're saying it specifically wasn't an official consort situation, and we in salon know Algarotti's status certainly wasn't exclusive, either as public companion or as lover. But the carriage ride to the homage ceremony in Königsberg was public and deliberate, imo, and a celebration by Fritz of his ability to have his self-chosen same-sex lover instead of his boring forced-marriage wife with him. Unless I'm wrong about how well-attested it is that Algarotti was riding with him, because I'm blanking on the exact source.
Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-14 09:26 pm (UTC)And you know who the other person in that carriage was? Keyserlingk. (One source for the three of them travelling together is a Fritz letter to AW IIRC.) Which is my point. You mention him yourself as Fritz having to sneak around to meet him. Envoys to other states mention him as the big Favourite. So if this podcast singles out Algarotti as the one lover he parades around, it's absolutely misleading. Yes, of course Fritz celebrated by freely surrounding himself with the people he loved, but ALL of them, and including non-romantic relationships. Not just Algarotti.
Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-15 08:49 am (UTC)Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-15 01:48 pm (UTC)Conclusion: the broadcast guys aren't the only ones prone to make excursions in which Mr. Hot Stuff was present into travels a deux even if they demonstrably weren't. :)
Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-15 01:53 pm (UTC)Didn't Fritz describe it as a "me-and-Algarotti, AW who?" trip to Catt?Somehow my eyes glazed right over that line. Yes! You just said that.
Fritz: When I rewrite history, people believe me. What can I say?
and I think Knobelsdorff (or maybe the last one is something the novelist who wrote about K made up)
I don't remember Knobelsdorff, but I could be forgetting. I do remember you and Felis found that Fritz and Algarotti stayed in separate inns, so sex was apparently not in the cards for that trip! (I think Fritz got hit by malaria toward the end, so he might have been feeling under the weather already?)
Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...
Date: 2022-12-15 02:52 pm (UTC)(I stand by my theory as to why Maupertois wanted to take Algarotti along to Lappland.)
Mind you, Algarotti was also handy for makng Fritz' excuses to de Broglie later on. BTW, I'm currently reading at last Mike Duncan's Lafayette biography, and I know Straßburg!Broglie is the father of 7 Years War!Broglie, but: is 7 Years War!Broglie also the same guy who thinks he will be stadtholder of the US and replace Washington when Lafayette's first trip to the colonies gets organized?
Broglies
Date: 2022-12-15 03:18 pm (UTC)Headcanon! This is my new headcanon.
(I stand by my theory as to why Maupertois wanted to take Algarotti along to Lappland.)
I have thought about writing this one too, but alas, my South Pole background don't extend to 18th century Lappland well enough for me to feel comfortable writing a fic without a lot more research. Would that Maupertuis had wanted to take Algarotti to the South Pole in the early 20th century, then I could write that in my sleep!
BTW, I'm currently reading at last Mike Duncan's Lafayette biography
Oh, nice. As noted, I have no idea how accurate it is, but it's readable.
is 7 Years War!Broglie also the same guy who thinks he will be stadtholder of the US and replace Washington when Lafayette's first trip to the colonies gets organized?
Older brother. 7 Years' War!Broglie is the older brother of wannabe-stadtholder, who was best known for his important role in Louis XV's secret service.
Cahn, Louis XV had official ministers who got told to do one thing, and a secret service who reported directly to him and often got told to do the opposite thing, and this did not make life easy on French ministers.
Re: Broglies
Date: 2022-12-15 03:26 pm (UTC)Just saying that I have read Linnaeus' journal of his travels in Lapland, from 1732! In case you want beta-reading/brainstorming help. : )
What is this trip, btw?
Re: Broglies
From:Re: Broglies
From:Re: Broglies
From:Re: Broglies
From:Re: Broglies
From:Re: Broglies
From:Re: Broglies
From:Re: Broglies
From:Re: Broglies
From:Re: Broglies
From:Re: Broglies
From:Frenchmen in Lapland
From:Re: Frenchmen in Lapland
From:Re: Frenchmen in Lapland
From:Re: Frenchmen in Lapland
From:Re: Frenchmen in Lapland
From:Re: Frenchmen in Lapland
From:Re: Frenchmen in Lapland
From:Re: Broglies
From:Re: Broglies
From:Re: Broglies
From:Re: Broglies
From:Re: Broglies
From:Re: Broglies
From:Re: Broglies
From:Re: Broglies
From: