mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
Funnily enough, when you posted that question, I had just gotten to the page where Marian Füssel talks about that in my reading (history of the Seven Years' War)!

I don't have statistics (other than the usual "Germany lost over half its population in places" and if that had happened again, I think we would know), but to summarize what he says:

* The historical narrative has always been that warfare got less destructive for a while after the Thirty Years' War, partly because more efficient bureaucracies meant less need to rely on forage and plunder, and partly because everyone got civilized and started avoiding big battles.

* But that's oversimplifying.

* Obviously 18th century warfare was not as bad as the Thirty Years' War or the coalition wars, says Füssel.

* But we have to distinguish between theory and practice.

* 18th century warfare was capable both of the civilized treatment of officers and of massacres, and the brutality was just as much a part of the Enlightenment as the rest.

That's what I've got.
luzula: a Luzula pilosa, or hairy wood-rush (Default)
From: [personal profile] luzula
Thanks! The book I am currently reading and will soon write up is shedding some light on this.

Profile

cahn: (Default)
cahn

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 5th, 2026 05:03 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios