cahn: (Default)
[personal profile] cahn
In the previous post Charles II found AITA:

Look, I, m, believe in live and let live. (And in not going on my travels again. Had enough of that to last a life time.) Why can't everyone else around me be more chill? Instead, my wife refuses to employ my girlfriend, my girlfriend won't budge and accept another office, my brother is set on a course to piss off everyone (he WILL go on his travels again), and my oldest kid shows signs of wanting my job which is just not on, sorry to say. And don't get me started about Mom (thank God she's living abroad). What am I doing wrong? AITA?

Re: Henri IV and Louis XIII

Date: 2022-04-23 07:21 pm (UTC)
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
Well, it kind of was! We don't know for sure what her skin color was; in northern Europe in the past, having a nickname (an eke-name) like "the Black" could mean "having pale skin but black hair, unlike all these blonds everyone's used to seeing." It certainly didn't mean "black" in the sense that "black" in modern English means "collection of phenotypes stemming from Africa." That's was why I, after some hesitation, translated "schwarz" as "dark." (This is relevant to why we don't know for sure what "Il Moro" in Alessandro "Il Moro" Medici means. What we call black? North African/Moorish/Middle Eastern?)

Maybe she had light skin and dark hair. Maybe she had olive-colored Mediterranean skin. (Judging by the apparently olive-colored skin of some of her descendants, like Charles II, I'm guessing the latter.) But either way, he was using "schwarz und fett" as an insult to mean "unattractive", and making her cry, which means he was being AN ASSHOLE.

(I did, from the beginning, entertain the possibility that he could be saying that, while she was a light-skinned blonde, she had passed on the dark coloring of her Mediterranean Medici family. That was Selena's first theory based on Rubens, and it does grammatically fit "wie jene" (like them) but--how many Medici has Henri met? And if you thought your wife's coloring was attractive, would you insult her and make her cry by talking about how the baby looks darker and resembles a family you've never seen? Maybe, but I think it's much more internally consistent to suppose that he went for blondes, that he equated "Medici" with "dark" because he saw his darker Medici wife every day, and that her dark coloring was part of the reason he preferred his mistress(es) to his wife and insulted her and her kid for their appearance.)

Re: Henri IV and Louis XIII

Date: 2022-04-23 07:58 pm (UTC)
selenak: (Contessina)
From: [personal profile] selenak
You know, agreed to all this, except for one thing: Henri knew at the very least one other Medici, the most famous Medici after Lorenzo il Magnifco, no less, to wit, his first mother-in-law, Catherine de‘ Medici, mother of Margot. Between the St. Bartholomew Wedding and years in genteel quasi captivity thereafter, I dare see she must have been memorable. And Catherine definitely had black hair and eyes.

(Actually Henri was way nicer about Catherine than about Maria, it seems, proving your point about him and his enemies vs him and his supporters, in a way. He famously said re: Catherine when people called her a monster years after her death: "I ask you, what could a woman do, left by the death of her husband with five little children on her arms, and two families of France who were thinking of grasping the crown - our own [the Bourbons] and the Guises? (Meaning you win or you die at the game of thrones, I suppose.)

Re: Henri IV and Louis XIII

Date: 2022-04-23 08:01 pm (UTC)
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
*headdesk*

Right you are! You'd think I hadn't just read an entire bio of Catherine and how she was always trying to keep Henri at court where she could keep an eye on him/try to convert him to Catholicism/use him as a hostage. That, and her coloring, would have influenced his impression of Medici coloring.

Actually Henri was way nicer about Catherine than about Maria

Indeed, this emerged from my reading as well.

Re: Henri IV and Louis XIII

Date: 2022-04-24 06:26 am (UTC)
selenak: (Contessina)
From: [personal profile] selenak
Maybe it were Sabine Appel's convoluted sentences that put you off the track. :)

Incidentally, speaking of Medici genes coming through, Antonia Fraser always claimed Charles II resembles Lorenzo the Magnificent (despite, may I had, Charles' grandmother Maria de' Medici coming from the younger branch of the Medici, which departed ways from Lorenzo's branch with the brother of Lorenzo's grandfather). Judge for yourself:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/10/Lorenzo_de_Medici.jpg


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2c/Charles_II_Portrait_by_Peter_Lily.jpeg

She's not entirely wrong.

However, now look at Maria de' Medici, and I don't just mean the Rubens portraits:

Maria as Regent:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e3/MariadeMedici.jpg

And to prove it's not just Rubens, this is Maria as a girl in Florence:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1e/MariadeMedici07.jpg

Now, I don't know about you, and maybe everyone who ever painted Maria was explicitly told to use the hair color she wanted rather than the one they saw. But the thing is, her mother was a Habsburg. (Johanna von Österreich.) (Niece of Charles V.) And this is how Johanna looked like:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Giuseppe_Arcimboldi_005.jpg/220px-Giuseppe_Arcimboldi_005.jpg

Conclusion, especially by comparison to Lorenzo and Charles: Maria inherited her looks from the Habsburgs rather than the Medici. Doesn't mean she can't have forwarded the dark Medici looks, she most probably did. And of course Henri was being an asshole with that "black and fat" remark either way, but methinks his idea of Medici looks really must have come from his mother in law rather than his wife. Catherine de' Medici when young Henri knew her:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Catarina_de_medici.jpg


Re: Henri IV and Louis XIII

Date: 2022-04-24 02:49 pm (UTC)
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
Maybe it were Sabine Appel's convoluted sentences that put you off the track. :)

LOL! No, I would like to blame Appel, but I am to blame: I was thinking of Marie's contemporaries, not the previous generation that had died 10 years before. Which is silly, as humans tend to meet people from more than one generation, and Henri IV certainly did.

But! While I have speculated that Marie was one of those people whose hair darkens when they hit puberty and that she missed her blonde days (especially with a husband like that), it occurs to me: Catherine was fat in her later years. With ten pregnancies, what do you expect? And Marie, after a single pregnancy, at the age of 16, was probably not, not yet.

So actually, I reverse my opinion a second time: I now think Henri was thinking of Catherine and that Marie was a blonde after all, as per Rubens. Which is interesting, because you tend to think of dark hair and skin as dominant, but they're both polygenic, non-Mendelian traits, so I suppose a brunette and a blonde could have black-haired, olive-skinned descendants. (Googling suggests it's rare but possible.)

Furthermore, I should report that Schultz strikes a blow on Marie's behalf by saying that Henri IV was unattractive and reeked of garlic, that women found him repulsive, that his mistresses were generally cheating on him with the men they were actually attracted to, and that all the action he got and his reputation as the "vert gallant" were due solely to him being king, the only reason any woman would ever sleep with him.

:D

Re: Henri IV and Louis XIII

Date: 2022-04-28 07:37 am (UTC)
selenak: (Default)
From: [personal profile] selenak
He wasn't married to her! But it is really interesting that he was so understanding because he would have had good reason to hate Catherine, and not just if you believe the worst case scenario.

(Reminder to your memory: Now, current dominating historical opinion isn't anymore that Catherine planned and masterminded the St. Bartholomew's massacre ahead of time but that she probably was sincere in arranging for the marriage of young Henri with her youngest daughter Margot to bring the Protestant and Catholic factions together. Also as a way to counteract the influence of the leading Protestant, Condé (Henri was a generation younger and outranking Condé as the King of Navarre, but both were Bourbons, i.e. the family which was next if Catherine's sons should all die without heirs), and to outmaneuvre the Guises, who were the leaders of the ultra-Catholic faction (and via their niece Mary Queen of Scots already owned one of the thrones of Europe with an eye on the English throne). But once Condé explicitly threatened her in the argument as to whether nor not to support the Netherlanders against Philip of Spain, Catherine signalled to the Duc de Guise who had a blood feud against Condé that she was okay with him murdering Condé. When that assassination was bungled by the assassin, with all the Protestants in the city for the Henri/Margot wedding, and a surviving Condé fuming, Catherine probably decided that it wasn't enough to kill Condé (this time not leaving it to the Guises) but that all the other heads of the Protestant faction had to go (minus Henri) so there could not be a retaliatory strike re: Condé. But it didn't happen this way, because religious hatred on the Catholic side was already at a boiling point - the whole idea of the marriage was hugely unpopular -, when people saw Protestants were killed they joined in, and instead of a surgical strike, a massacre evolved, which lasted for days. And later of course most people believed that was what Catherine had intended all along.

As I said, even if you don't believe that - Henri, unlike current day historians, didn't regard this as a historical event weighing evidence pro and against and with access to lots of source material, he was right there, his friends died along with so many others, and his own life was at stake because once the massacre was rolling and it was clear no one could stop it, he was basically given a "convert or die" option. So he would have had all the reason in the world to loathe Catherine and curse her memory, and nothing to gain by speaking well, even understanding of her, years after her death. But he did, and he also was the one to order that her earthly remains be transferred to the royal crypt in St. Denis next to her husband's and children's. (Catherine had died at Blois, not Paris, and at the time of her death France was split in a three ways war between her son Henri III, the Guises (now openly against the throne) and future Henri IV and the Protestants; one of Catherine's last political acts had been a journey to future Henri IV to negotiate an alliance between him and her son.) There's also the coincidence (or not) that Henri IV issued the Edict of Nantes, which gave Protestants equal civil rights (until his grandson Louis XIV revoked it), on Catherine's birthday once he ruled. Anyway: he did not hate Catherine, and it does look as if he respected her.
Edited Date: 2022-04-28 07:39 am (UTC)

Profile

cahn: (Default)
cahn

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 12 3 456
78910111213
1415 1617181920
2122232425 2627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 31st, 2025 01:17 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios