Also, Peter, I'm sorry you died at age 45, but at least you didn't have to watch your teenage son slowly waste away. :(
:(((( I'm also sad that his mother did have to watch it, although I suppose maybe that beats also being dead?
Yeah, "unlike your wife" was definitely the subtext of my remark, though I agree I'd rather not be dead!
HE GOT INTO A DUEL.
ahhhhhh! I do find Fritz's response funny, though.
Same! I'm also super glad I had a last minute change of plans and decided to spend December going over archive papers that I had decided I had done as much with as I was going to.
Re: Peter's sons
Date: 2025-01-05 05:57 am (UTC)Also, Peter, I'm sorry you died at age 45, but at least you didn't have to watch your teenage son slowly waste away. :(
:(((( I'm also sad that his mother did have to watch it, although I suppose maybe that beats also being dead?
HE GOT INTO A DUEL.
ahhhhhh! I do find Fritz's response funny, though.
Re: Peter's sons
Date: 2025-01-06 12:44 pm (UTC)Heee! Speaking of which, there were a few threads in September to which you never replied, so I wanted to make sure you saw them: Keith family drama, Paintings of Fredersdorf?, Lehndorff is so emo.
Also, Peter, I'm sorry you died at age 45, but at least you didn't have to watch your teenage son slowly waste away. :(
:(((( I'm also sad that his mother did have to watch it, although I suppose maybe that beats also being dead?
Yeah, "unlike your wife" was definitely the subtext of my remark, though I agree I'd rather not be dead!
HE GOT INTO A DUEL.
ahhhhhh! I do find Fritz's response funny, though.
Same! I'm also super glad I had a last minute change of plans and decided to spend December going over archive papers that I had decided I had done as much with as I was going to.
Re: Peter's sons
Date: 2025-01-09 03:58 am (UTC)Re: Peter's sons
Date: 2025-01-09 01:59 pm (UTC)