Re: Peter Keith in the archives!

Date: 2023-01-03 08:53 pm (UTC)
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
Oh! And I forgot to mention, chronology is key here: In March 1750, Peter writes Fritz a "please give me a lump sum of money to pay off my debts" letter (which ends with "I really really just want to be useful to you and worthy of the greatest king in the world, that is my only ambition"), and then in summer/early autumn of 1750, Fritz surprises Peter with a box of coins and a letter recommending him to his mother-in-law. This was the first scene of my fic, you may recall. So now I think that surprise lump sum of money had to do with this letter!

"I have no other ambition than to be useful to you"--either Peter finally figured out the magic words to say to Fritz after the dismal failure of 1740, or else Fritz finally had 10 years of evidence to convince him that Peter wasn't pushing for high office or influence, or both.

Btw, almost all the chronology in that fic was either deliberately wrong or else I knew at the time that it was going to turn out to be wrong when we had more evidence--and so it has come to pass. But I'm delighted that we're finding answers to almost all my questions and connecting all these dots!

Biggest outstanding question: Where was Peter buried? Second biggest outstanding question I can think of: when did his younger son die?

Re: Peter Keith in the archives!

Date: 2023-01-04 08:19 am (UTC)
selenak: (Rheinsberg)
From: [personal profile] selenak
So Peter actually made Fritz (provisional?) godfather and then asked for acceptance afterward? Was that how it worked with royal godparents, you waited to see if it was going to survive, had them baptized with the royal's name in the register, and then asked to see if said royal would accept? Is that what Trenck did with Joseph?

On the one hand: if you think about it, it makes sense in that with the mail needing sometimes months to arrive unless you're a royal with a special courier of your own at hand, in an age with high children mortality and were you believe the child's soul is at stake, you want that baptizing done quickly. So I bet that's how Trenck did it, not just with Joseph but also Amalie, only asking after the fact, so to speak. Plus in the Peter and Fritz case, Fritz is at war, so who knows when the letter will find him.

On the other hand: a pregnancy takes nine months. You'd think it makes sense to ask potential high ranking godfatahers and -mothers before the kid is born during the seven or so months you know about the impending arrival?

I dimly seem to recall something about FW changing his mind with Ferdinand, not on the godfathers but which one the kid was to be called after in daily life, with him first being called August after August the Strong, and then Ferdinand after *mind blanks* But that doesn't say anything as to when permission was asked even among royals.

Oh, and Leopold is called Peter Leopold because MT in an effort to win Elizaveta over to the cause against Fritz and for Austria asked her to be godmother to Leopold, with the name "Peter" taken from Elizaveta's father since they hardly could call the kid "Elisabethus".

I'm glad Peter has such legible handwriting! And I have another, not that important queston. I'm just curious as to whether he ever found out he was suggested as a candidate for Prussian envoy in London and that Fritz rejected this idea?

Re: Peter Keith in the archives!

Date: 2023-01-04 04:27 pm (UTC)
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
That's exactly what I thought! Yes, it makes sense that you might not bother a busy royal every time you have the prospect of a kid that might be miscarried/stillborn/die within 24 hours, and also that you would baptize your kid as quickly as possible*, but I was very surprised to see that you would put down a royal right away and ask permission later! What if they said no? Did you go back and update the church register?

* Except not in France, at least according to Horowski! Where they would sometimes wait years, and this one noble didn't even get a first name until he was 20-something and finally needed an official name to put down in the register so he could hold some office. How the French squared that with infant mortality and Catholicism, idk. Maybe all their babies just went to limbo!

Ferdinand after *mind blanks*

Ooh, good question. Who were the royal Ferdinands of 1730? There was future Ferdinand VI of Spain (mentally ill guy who almost got married to poor niece Isabella of Parma), who I think would have been Prince of Asturias (Spanish equivalent of crown prince) at the time? He's the only one coming to mind, though there are enough minor German princes running around that there's probably one there I'm forgetting.

ETA: Oh, duh, there's a Ferdinand of Brunswick, much closer to home!

I'm glad Peter has such legible handwriting!

My decision to choose Peter as my research subject is vindicated! <3

And I have another, not that important queston. I'm just curious as to whether he ever found out he was suggested as a candidate for Prussian envoy in London and that Fritz rejected this idea?

Ooh, yes, I have many questions that are not that important for my essay-in-progress but are actually of more personal interest to me than the death of his younger son. I just feel like I need that one to check all the boxes and feel like the essay is complete.

If I ever find out the answer to the envoy question, you'll be the first to know!
Edited Date: 2023-01-05 02:54 am (UTC)

Re: Peter Keith in the archives!

Date: 2023-01-05 01:48 pm (UTC)
selenak: (Default)
From: [personal profile] selenak
Ferdinand of Brunswick, of course! And now I think it might have been mentioned in Stratemann's reports, when both the Charlotte and the Fritz/EC marriage were nearing completion, that FW decided his youngest would now be called Ferdinand in honor of the Duke instead of August.

Re: Peter Keith in the archives!

Date: 2023-01-05 08:27 pm (UTC)
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
When I remembered he existed, I had to break my own rule and get out of bed and go get my phone to share the duh moment. ;) It makes so much more sense now.

Btw, I heard back from [personal profile] prinzsorgenfrei, and they are busy with university but going to help out with decipherment when they have time!

Re: Peter Keith in the archives!

Date: 2023-01-21 12:16 am (UTC)
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
Biggest outstanding question: Where was Peter buried?

[personal profile] cahn FOUND it!!! \o/ Details this weekend.

Nikolaikirche

Date: 2023-01-21 02:53 pm (UTC)
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
What a time to be alive!

Heee! You also said Peter and Ariane had only been linked in December 2022, and her name is so badly misspelled that you wouldn't have found her and her baptism record otherwise!

Peter: was buried January 2, 1757 in the Nikolaikirche. What I have found so far on the Nikolaikirche:

1. Goes back to the 1200s and is the oldest intact church in the center of Berlin.

2. Was a popular burial site over the centuries.

3. Was predictably partially destroyed by bombs in WWII. I have not yet determined the preservation state of burials from Jan 2, 1757, but you can guess that this will become a major research interest of mine soon. ;)

4. Was beautifully restored and is a museum today. You can walk around inside on Google Maps using street view, and if you're in Berlin, you should go! It is huge, really cool looking, and looks like there are a *ton* of elements of historical and art historical interest. (Highly recommend the street view from the inside, it's almost like visiting the building (except I'm having trouble reading the plaques and informational panels, dammit).)

5. Was located 1 km from Peter's house.



Nitpick: I entered the Nicolaihaus as Peter's address, though it wasn't where Peter was living when he died. We don't have the address, we just know it was adjacent or nearly adjacent to the Nicolaihaus, where he had lived previously.

That reminds me, Selena, you mentioned when this came up previously that you would visit the Nicolaihaus when you were in Berlin, to pay respects to Peter, but I presume also because Nicolai is also of interest to salon (and there will be more detail on him in the house/museum). Did you ever end up going?

Something I'm curious about: when Nicolai was writing about Peter in the 1790s, did he know he was living in the house Peter used to live in?

P.S. If Peter's burial is still there in the Nikolaikirche, I *will* ask for a visit and pics next time anyone is in Berlin ;), but that is TBD. Stay tuned!

ETA: Btw, I have let [personal profile] prinzsorgenfrei know we have a burial record (Peter) and a baptismal record (Ariane) in need of transcriptions! Ariane's is mostly readable even to me, Peter's is...not.
Edited Date: 2023-01-21 02:58 pm (UTC)

Re: Nikolaikirche

Date: 2023-01-21 03:17 pm (UTC)
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
Proof that it's worth visiting even if Peter's not still there:





Re: Nikolaikirche

Date: 2023-01-21 03:39 pm (UTC)
selenak: (Default)
From: [personal profile] selenak
Sold! And no, I did not have the time to visit the Nicolaihaus last two times I was in Berlin. November 2021: Covid conditions. I was at a hybrid conference and we were ultra careful. November 2022: no more Covid conditions, but very little time. Hopefully, next time I'll have the chance!

Re: Nikolaikirche

Date: 2023-01-21 04:17 pm (UTC)
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
I endorse being ultra careful! As you know, I am still not traveling at all or even doing anything locally beyond occasional grocery shopping.

I hope the pandemic lets up and I feel safe traveling soon, because I just added the Nikolaikirche to the list of places I have to visit!

Re: Peter Keith in the archives!

Date: 2023-01-21 07:31 am (UTC)
selenak: (Cleopatra winks by Ever_Maedhros)
From: [personal profile] selenak
*highfives*

That's awesome!

Re: Peter Keith in the archives!

Date: 2023-01-21 06:14 pm (UTC)
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
Second biggest outstanding question I can think of: when did his younger son die?

November 1764! Exactly as we suspected: he's in the 1764 Berlin address calendar, living with his brother, and not in the 1765 entry, and by 1786, the older son is mentioned as the only living son of his parents. And remember, he was listed as baptized at home in 1745, because of illness.

Aww, that's sad. He was only 19. :/ And poor Ariane and Peter Carl Ernst Reinhardt, losing husband/Dad Peter in 1756 and son/brother Friedrich Ludwig in 1764. :(

ETA: I don't have a death date, but the burial date is Nov 17. Oh, interesting, looks like it was also the Nikolakirche! AWWW. (Not surprising, but remember that Ariane, as a great governess to the queen, was buried in the Parochialkirche.)

(So what happened is I asked [personal profile] cahn to go look through Family Search for these records, and she pointed out a lot of them come from Ancestry.com. After a bit of digging, I remembered why I had written off Ancestry.com years ago: too expensive for international records. I had forgotten the reason and thought it was because it didn't have what I needed. Well, now that money is no object (at least for one month), I have forked over and am on a genealogical rampage of my own!)

I have also accidentally found the burial record of Suhm's daughter who married a different (presumably distantly related) Lt. Col. von Keith: she died February 1785 and was buried in Neuwerk Rendsburg, Schleswig-Holstein.

Off to find more records!
Edited Date: 2023-01-21 06:34 pm (UTC)

Re: Peter Keith in the archives!

Date: 2023-01-21 08:47 pm (UTC)
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
Next most interesting question to me: when exactly in 1822 (thank you, Kloosterhuis) did Peter Carl Ernst Reinhardt die, and where was he buried?

October 20, buried October 24 in the Parochialkirche! (At least according to the transcription, I'll leave deciphering the text to [personal profile] prinzsorgenfrei.)

So younger son (age 19) is with Dad (age 45), older son (age 78) is with Mom (age 71). <3

ETA: So here's an interesting point to add to the fact that Ariane was buried in the Parochialkirche because she was a great governess: her parents were married there*, she and at least one of her sisters [son and daughter of ETA: make that at least 3 of her siblings] were baptized there, her surviving son was buried there. I think this was also just the church the Knyphausens attended!

(I also think it makes perfect sense that Friedrich Ludwig was buried near the only parent who was dead at the time, and Carl Ernst was buried at the church near to the mother he'd been interacting with and probably attending church with, and possibly close to, until he was almost 50. I think the record says he was buried in the same crypt as his mother, but I'll wait for Prinzsorgenfrei to continue.)

* ETA again: Well, I could have sworn her parents were married there, but now that I'm looking at the doc I originally found, it doesn't name a church, and there's a completely different marriage record for them that says Berlin Dom.

Yes, I have found two completely separate records for almost all of these things: Ariane, Peter, and Friedrich Ludwig all have 2 burial records! Ariane has one in French and one in German. Peter has two burial dates (Jan 2 and Jan 3). Let's just say the record-keeping is iiinteresting.

Btw, this has interesting implications for searching, because apparently the Marienkirche collected data on who died when and where they were buried, somewhat after the fact (like monthly?) and added up how many burials per church. And they tend to just list the title, not the first name, so we've got Leutnant Keith for Peter, Resendarius (a mistranscription for "referendarius") Keith for Friedrich Ludwig, and Baronne Keith for Ariane. So you have to know your history as you scan the lists of results!

No baptism for Carl Ernst yet.
Edited Date: 2023-01-21 09:37 pm (UTC)

Re: Peter Keith in the archives!

Date: 2023-01-22 04:20 pm (UTC)
selenak: (CourtierLehndorff)
From: [personal profile] selenak
(I also think it makes perfect sense that Friedrich Ludwig was buried near the only parent who was dead at the time, and Carl Ernst was buried at the church near to the mother he'd been interacting with and probably attending church with, and possibly close to, until he was almost 50. I think the record says he was buried in the same crypt as his mother, but I'll wait for Prinzsorgenfrei to continue.)

Yes, absolutely. And may I say: given how thoroughly bombed Berlin was, and that church records not involving a Hohenzollern probably were low on the evacuation and safe keeping priority list, it's nothing short of amazing that all these records still exist and survived long enough to be digitalized.

Peter has two burial dates (Jan 2 and Jan 3)

Maybe someone transcribed badly? If you write 2 and 3 sloppily, I could see a mistake being made, but then I haven't seen the original.

BTW, I just checked Lehndorff who presumably attended the burial, but he doesn't mention the exact date in his lengthy and heartfelt entry on Peter in the 24 - 31 December 1756 section of his diary, and the next printed date is January 11 1757.

Re: Peter Keith in the archives!

Date: 2023-01-22 04:40 pm (UTC)
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
I'll wait for Prinzsorgenfrei to continue.

Confirm, not continue.

And may I say: given how thoroughly bombed Berlin was, and that church records not involving a Hohenzollern probably were low on the evacuation and safe keeping priority list, it's nothing short of amazing that all these records still exist and survived long enough to be digitalized.

I know! I was lamenting to Royal Patron in 2021 that I didn't know where Peter was buried, and he said, "Well, that information is out there waiting to be found!" and I said, "You're forgetting about the bombing in WWII. It might very well not be."

But he was right, it was! (I am still surprised.)

Maybe someone transcribed badly? If you write 2 and 3 sloppily, I could see a mistake being made, but then I haven't seen the original.

I thought of that and looked before posting, and I'm *pretty* sure they're a 2 and a 3, but as always, Prinzsorgenfrei can weigh in.

his lengthy and heartfelt entry on Peter

<3

the next printed date is January 11 1757.

Yeah, I searched through the index and the search function for any Keith mentions and collated them back in the day, and didn't get anything on the burial. (But always feel free to check yourself, search functions and indexing are error prone.)

I also turned up a marriage and burial record that I *think* may be one of Peter's brothers, whom Kloosterhuis mentions as a possible candidate for not!Robert. His name is Johann Friedrich, Kloosterhuis says he lived 1714-1793 and lived in East Prussia. I have a marriage record for a Johann Friederich in East Prussia in 1744 (definitely the right age for a first marriage) and a death record for a Joh. Fried. Keitt in 1793 in West Prussia.

On the other hand, there's a Michael Fredersdorf getting married in Berlin in October 1754 who is not our Michael Fredersdorf, so could be a different Keith!

[ETA: The marriage one has a von and is spelled correctly and is in at least the right region; I just realized that in *addition* ot having the wrong spelling and being in the wrong place, the 1793 death has no "von". So I'm inclined to think the burial record is unrelated, but the marriage still might be.]

In other news, I knew Suhm had lost two children at young ages (2 and 10), but it was still sad seeing their burial records.

Also, the handwriting of all the records I found in Dresden is weird! Very loopy, almost looks like Georgian.
Edited Date: 2023-01-23 01:45 am (UTC)

Post-bombing

Date: 2023-01-23 03:22 am (UTC)
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
To this point, I meant to share this picture of the Nikolaikirche after the bombing. Only the outer walls remained. So all those beautiful pictures I shared? Restoration work.

https://www.bz-berlin.de/archiv-artikel/das-comeback-der-engel if you want to read the article and see other pictures.

Profile

cahn: (Default)
cahn

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12345 67
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 07:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios