Last post, along with the usual 18th-century suspects, included the Ottonians; changing ideas of conception and women's sexual pleasure; Isabella of Parma (the one who fell in love, and vice versa, with her husband's sister); Henry IV and Bertha (and Henry's second wife divorcing him for "unspeakable sexual acts"). (Okay, Isabella of Parma was 18th century.)
Re: The Making and Doubting of a Sensational Tale: The Rape of Fano
Date: 2022-12-04 01:57 pm (UTC)Oh, same here. I mean, it's slightly unfair of me re: teenage Ottavio, who I'm sure was under a lot of pressure from his family and was shamed afterwards for, err, not performing, given his father (whether or not his father was a bishop rapist, he certainly had lots of sex with both genders). But because of the social rules of the day, first teenage and then adult Ottavia was given complete power over his wife, and so my sympathies will always be with Margaret first.
(And I'm really glad she won Grandfather Pope's sympathies, which allowed her to be first lady of Rome socially, learn a lot and be talked into sleeping with Ottavia seven years later, as opposed to being forced to have sex with him as her wifely duty right then and there, which I'm sure would have been Pier Luigi's idea of how to solve the Ottavio/Margaret problem.)
Re: The Making and Doubting of a Sensational Tale: The Rape of Fano
Date: 2022-12-18 10:24 pm (UTC)