And including Emperor Joseph II!
from Derek Beales: Joseph II, Volume 2: Against the World, 1780 - 1790:
Joseph's alleged comment to Mozart about the Entführung, "Too many notes", has been taken as evidence of his ignorance. But he probably said something like, "Too beautiful for our ears, and monstrous many notes." It is always necessary to bear in mind, when appraising the emperor's remarks, his peculiar brand of humor or sarcasm. He was usually getting at someone. And he did not use the royal "we". The ears in question were those of the Viennese audience, whom he was mocking for their limited appreciation of Mozart's elaborate music.
(though not gonna lie, I think it is a LOT of notes)
from Derek Beales: Joseph II, Volume 2: Against the World, 1780 - 1790:
Joseph's alleged comment to Mozart about the Entführung, "Too many notes", has been taken as evidence of his ignorance. But he probably said something like, "Too beautiful for our ears, and monstrous many notes." It is always necessary to bear in mind, when appraising the emperor's remarks, his peculiar brand of humor or sarcasm. He was usually getting at someone. And he did not use the royal "we". The ears in question were those of the Viennese audience, whom he was mocking for their limited appreciation of Mozart's elaborate music.
(though not gonna lie, I think it is a LOT of notes)
Re: Helga Peham: Leopold II. Herrscher mit weiser Hand. (Vienna 1987) - I
Date: 2022-02-20 11:15 am (UTC)Thinking of contemporaries who were mostly negative about others and whom I still feel differently about: well, Hervey‘s memoirs are also a hilarious „everyone sucks!“ bitchfest (I mean, they suck in different degrees, Caroline and one of her daughters less than others, and he has some impressive things to report about her, but „she lived for power“ wasn‘t meant as a compliment). But only is Hervey a far better writer than Leopold (judging by the excerpts quoted in biographies), able to be witty in his badmouthing which Leopold is not, Hervey also has his share of positive emotions, for love-of-his-life Stephen and for Algarotti, among others.
MT and her children: Leopold‘s biographer goes with the general characterisation that FS was the fun, easy-going parent (up to a point: see FS pushing Joseph just as much to remarry as MT did), and MT was the aweinspiring disciplinary one whom they also were somewhat afraid of. This is probably partly caused by their gender atypical social roles, but also the expression of their respective natures. Now corresponding with your kid‘s teachers about your kid and instructing them were what many a royal parent did - hence us knowing all about FW wanting to be the fun parent, with SD as the disciplinary parent, and utterly failing at achieving this, for example - , but because of who she was, her various assessments are better preserved than most.