Oh, interesting. Would these have been indentured servants?
Yes, it seems so, and that they served their seven-year terms and then mostly stayed in America. Don't know where though!
What's the difference between Jacobitism and Jacobinism?
Hee! You should have seen me when I first ran across Jacobitism (which was in Naomi Mitchison's excellent novel The Bull Calves). Me: "...are Jacobites the same as Jacobins?"
No, no they were not. The Jacobins are the radical republicans in the French revolution. *g* They came to Ireland to help out in a rising there in 1798.
I second mildred_of_midgard on wanting to know about civil wars breaking the military deadlock!
I always roll my eyes when I'm reading a history book and the author confuses them, which happens far more than it should.
The Jacobins are the radical republicans in the French revolution. *g*
And this is why I found it so fascinating when you said that the Irish managed to transition naturally from Jacobitism to Jacobinism, because, cahn, Jacobitism started life as support for the dispossessed Stuarts. The Stuarts being the guys whose political philosophy was "I am a monarch by God-given divine right, and no rabble known as Parliament has the right to gainsay that."
And then apparently you get the Stuarts having to make concessions in exile (this I had either not learned, or more likely, forgotten, because I was far more into this for the military history than political or diplomatic history at the time), and then you end up with the Jacobins, whose political philosophy is, "We don't need no stinkin' king!"
Robespierre was a Jacobin. The Jacobins were the Reign of Terror guys. This is not what I would have expected from a party that started as the supporters of James II, Mister Absolute Monarchy!
So, like I was saying to luzula, I knew who the Jacobins were before salon (but not the Jacobites whom I hadn't really heard of except for luzula/salon mentioning them) and lol, when she brought them up this time I was like... OK, but they couldn't be those Jacobins because Reign of Terror != Irish supporters of the Stuarts?? (Hilariously, I even did a google search before asking who they were, which of course came up with, well, Jacobins, and I discarded it because it obviously couldn't be them :) )
I admit I was surprised you didn't know who the Jacobins were, but I figured it had just been a long time and you had forgotten! This makes sense, yes. And yeah, the part that awed me was the Stuart supporters -> Reign of Terror supporters too!
And then apparently you get the Stuarts having to make concessions in exile (this I had either not learned, or more likely, forgotten, because I was far more into this for the military history than political or diplomatic history at the time), and then you end up with the Jacobins, whose political philosophy is, "We don't need no stinkin' king!"
I mean, despite the Stuarts making concessions and committing themselves to more radical politics, I don't think the Jacobite ideology transforms into the Jacobin one. More I guess that Ireland was a special case. Here's a paragraph from the book:
As we have seen, Irish Jacobitism had very deep roots in Irish-language culture. And thus it is not surprising to find that as late as the 1760s and 1780s peasant secret societies like the Whiteboys and Rightboys were still associating themselves with Jacobitism.³⁴ Because their attachment to the Stuarts stemmed from an oral, plebeian culture shared by the majority of the population, but separate from the ‘great tradition’ of their patrician counterparts, it was, moreover, naturally resistant to the forces of change, disillusionment and despair that destroyed Jacobitism elsewhere in the British Isles, and consequently may even have lingered into the 1790s.³⁵ Hence the oaths and rhetoric of the Defenders (a plebeian Catholic secret society that succeeded the Rightboys), who were recruited to fight for Ireland’s freedom by republican, Protestant, United Irishmen between 1796 and 1798, still contained references to the Stuarts.³⁶ Ireland’s special brand of sectarian oppression was, nevertheless, clearly already giving rise to enduring patterns of resentment and resistance that would make its social and political development unique within the British Isles. The hidden Ireland’s lingering affection for the Jacobite cause was a symptom rather than a cause of this. Hence the transition from monarchism to republicanism as the guiding light of this secret culture that took place at the end of the eighteenth century may have been relatively easy; both were means to an end – the overthrow of the ruling elite.³⁷
I suppose in England and Scotland people of all classes disaffected with the current government might naturally turn to Jacobitism in the first half of the 18th century. And then Jacobitism gradually faded away...and in the 1790's such people might instead naturally turn to Jacobinism, at least if they're from the lower or middle classes. But it doesn't mean the first evolved into the latter. Also, I guess this means the British elite was more unified in the 1790's and onward, than it was in the first half of the 18th century?
Ah! I did learn as a child about indentured servants in the colonies -- I think a bunch of the English colonies had them, e.g. I have dim memories of Virginia?
LOL I knew who the Jacobins were due to my lovely French teacher who gave me books on the French Revolution, but somehow I didn't know or forgot (probably didn't know) that they ever came to Ireland!
Re: Write-up of "The Jacobites", by Daniel Szechi (2019)
Date: 2021-11-21 07:19 pm (UTC)Yes, it seems so, and that they served their seven-year terms and then mostly stayed in America. Don't know where though!
What's the difference between Jacobitism and Jacobinism?
Hee! You should have seen me when I first ran across Jacobitism (which was in Naomi Mitchison's excellent novel The Bull Calves). Me: "...are Jacobites the same as Jacobins?"
No, no they were not. The Jacobins are the radical republicans in the French revolution. *g* They came to Ireland to help out in a rising there in 1798.
I second
ETA: Check out this comment.
Re: Write-up of "The Jacobites", by Daniel Szechi (2019)
Date: 2021-11-21 10:16 pm (UTC)I always roll my eyes when I'm reading a history book and the author confuses them, which happens far more than it should.
The Jacobins are the radical republicans in the French revolution. *g*
And this is why I found it so fascinating when you said that the Irish managed to transition naturally from Jacobitism to Jacobinism, because,
And then apparently you get the Stuarts having to make concessions in exile (this I had either not learned, or more likely, forgotten, because I was far more into this for the military history than political or diplomatic history at the time), and then you end up with the Jacobins, whose political philosophy is, "We don't need no stinkin' king!"
Robespierre was a Jacobin. The Jacobins were the Reign of Terror guys. This is not what I would have expected from a party that started as the supporters of James II, Mister Absolute Monarchy!
Re: Write-up of "The Jacobites", by Daniel Szechi (2019)
Date: 2021-11-23 08:20 pm (UTC)Re: Write-up of "The Jacobites", by Daniel Szechi (2019)
Date: 2021-11-24 12:24 am (UTC)Re: Write-up of "The Jacobites", by Daniel Szechi (2019)
Date: 2021-11-24 10:03 pm (UTC)I mean, despite the Stuarts making concessions and committing themselves to more radical politics, I don't think the Jacobite ideology transforms into the Jacobin one. More I guess that Ireland was a special case. Here's a paragraph from the book:
As we have seen, Irish Jacobitism had very deep roots in Irish-language culture. And thus it is not surprising to find that as late as the 1760s and 1780s peasant secret societies like the Whiteboys and Rightboys were still associating themselves with Jacobitism.³⁴ Because their attachment to the Stuarts stemmed from an oral, plebeian culture shared by the majority of the population, but separate from the ‘great tradition’ of their patrician counterparts, it was, moreover, naturally resistant to the forces of change, disillusionment and despair that destroyed Jacobitism elsewhere in the British Isles, and consequently may even have lingered into the 1790s.³⁵ Hence the oaths and rhetoric of the Defenders (a plebeian Catholic secret society that succeeded the Rightboys), who were recruited to fight for Ireland’s freedom by republican, Protestant, United Irishmen between 1796 and 1798, still contained references to the Stuarts.³⁶ Ireland’s special brand of sectarian oppression was, nevertheless, clearly already giving rise to enduring patterns of resentment and resistance that would make its social and political development unique within the British Isles. The hidden Ireland’s lingering affection for the Jacobite cause was a symptom rather than a cause of this. Hence the transition from monarchism to republicanism as the guiding light of this secret culture that took place at the end of the eighteenth century may have been relatively easy; both were means to an end – the overthrow of the ruling elite.³⁷
I suppose in England and Scotland people of all classes disaffected with the current government might naturally turn to Jacobitism in the first half of the 18th century. And then Jacobitism gradually faded away...and in the 1790's such people might instead naturally turn to Jacobinism, at least if they're from the lower or middle classes. But it doesn't mean the first evolved into the latter. Also, I guess this means the British elite was more unified in the 1790's and onward, than it was in the first half of the 18th century?
Re: Write-up of "The Jacobites", by Daniel Szechi (2019)
Date: 2021-11-27 05:12 am (UTC)Re: Write-up of "The Jacobites", by Daniel Szechi (2019)
Date: 2021-11-23 08:16 pm (UTC)LOL I knew who the Jacobins were due to my lovely French teacher who gave me books on the French Revolution, but somehow I didn't know or forgot (probably didn't know) that they ever came to Ireland!