Re: Suhm letters III

Date: 2021-03-20 05:29 am (UTC)
cahn: (0)
From: [personal profile] cahn
Suhm apparently wrote a very long letter explaining in detail why he was so busy, which the 1787 editor says he cut out (in general, he says he cuts out a lot whenever Suhm starts to get boring), and since Trier has nothing that the 1787 translation doesn't, apparently Preuss silently cut too!

Me: Wait, you mean he got cut whenever he started getting chatty??

Suhm joins the ranks of people who can't do vivid pen portraits when he depicts Duke Anton Ulrich, whom he portrays in generically positive terms.

Me: ...oh, okay, maybe he really was just boring.

Oh! [personal profile] cahn, Anton Ulrich is...

OH THAT GUY. FRIIIIIITZ (and even more, Elizaveta! And Catherine! :((((((((((((((( )

That's interesting that he would have been for the Silesian invasion!

ugh, I am not going to be able to get to the threesome tonight, much less all the other amazing stuff salon has produced this week, but, wow.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

cahn: (Default)
cahn

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 121314151617
1819 2021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 03:31 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios