I also am a tad confused about the price for jpgs, which seems to be different depending on whether is already a digital scan or not, and yet it doesn't say in the catalogue whether there is.
I'm guessing there isn't, since the catalogue says only about a third of the stocks are even listed, and the letter we want (371) isn't even in the catalogue. So I'm guessing we'd be paying the full price. Which I for one would consider it worth contributing to, for anatomical details of one of Fritz's homoerotic relationships!
This is fascinating for several reasons:
Omg, yes, it certainly is!
none of them, however, mention Glasow copied Fredersdorf's signet.
As Leining - the actual successor - writing proves.
Yes, these are wonderful details to add to our knowledge of this episode!
Also, this description of Leining's letter doesn't sound as if he's under the impression Fredersdorf resigned either in disgrace or otherwise not in favor.
That was exactly my reaction too.
What none of this has anything to do with, otoh, is the story Fahlenkamp provides re: Fredersdorf, which I've written and commented on earlier in this entry, strenghening my suspicion that one isn't contemporary at all but was added much, much later.
I agree, and I look forward to your future write-up of the 1944 book, and also my condolences in advance for having to read it.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: New and Upcoming Sources Pt. 1
Date: 2020-10-29 08:12 pm (UTC)I'm guessing there isn't, since the catalogue says only about a third of the stocks are even listed, and the letter we want (371) isn't even in the catalogue. So I'm guessing we'd be paying the full price. Which I for one would consider it worth contributing to, for anatomical details of one of Fritz's homoerotic relationships!
This is fascinating for several reasons:
Omg, yes, it certainly is!
none of them, however, mention Glasow copied Fredersdorf's signet.
As Leining - the actual successor - writing proves.
Yes, these are wonderful details to add to our knowledge of this episode!
Also, this description of Leining's letter doesn't sound as if he's under the impression Fredersdorf resigned either in disgrace or otherwise not in favor.
That was exactly my reaction too.
What none of this has anything to do with, otoh, is the story Fahlenkamp provides re: Fredersdorf, which I've written and commented on earlier in this entry, strenghening my suspicion that one isn't contemporary at all but was added much, much later.
I agree, and I look forward to your future write-up of the 1944 book, and also my condolences in advance for having to read it.