cahn: (Default)
So I spent the last month marinating in Eugene Onegin, which started out just being because I found out Hvorostovsky had died and wanted to watch the Met 2007 Onegin with him and Fleming again, and then (as I do) I had SO MANY feelings about it and Tatyana in particular, and there was this Chocolate Box letter (which may have been where I found this out? or was it meme, I forget), and then as I do I really started getting obsessed. With predictable results. But anyway.

I spent most of the time listening obsessively to the Opera in English Chandos recording, because I do a lot better when I can get that intuitive connection in English. (I like dubbed movies too. I know, I know. I am a Philistine.) And Kiri te Kanawa and Thomas Hampson are both great as Tatyana and Onegin. The translation is… interesting. They have chosen to go with a metered and rhyming translation, which in theory I am totally for because it gives much more of a sense as to how it would come across as a native-language production. In practice, now that I know the translated text pretty well, there are several odd choices — for example, Onegin's half of the duet at the end seems to stress death a lot ("I would die, Tatyana! Yes, die for you!"), and ends with "Now only death remains!" which is, at least from the translation I have, not really how the Russian goes ("Oh, my pitiable fate!") and with very different connotations. Now, it's true that in Pushkin there is rather more talk as to how Onegin is wasting away and almost dies from love, so I suspect that is what it's referring to, but the end certainly doesn't have Onegin talking about dying (or about anything else — Tatyana puts him in his place, she leaves, he hears her husband coming home, end scene and book) and it's a rather different feel to have him keep talking about death.

But anyway, Tchaikovsky is just phenomenal. I have always loved Tchaikovsky a lot — but, like, there are all these little orchestral flourishes and lovely bits, like when Gremin talks about how Tatyana, in his melancholy life, was "like sunshine" and the woodwind comes in in a cadence that's, well, rather like sunshine — and so many totally amazing melodies — Gremin's aria, the Letter scene (this melody was in my head for weeks on end, it's that beautiful, haunting and melancholy and hopeful and yearning and then triumphantly yearning — AGH). He's really the most cinematic composer ever.

And then there's the Met 2007 performance -- Hvorostovsky and Fleming are so magnetic — and Vargas' voice is gorgeous — and [personal profile] categranger's letter sold me on Olga/Lensky like whoa. (I had always been a little suspicious of Olga/Lensky because Pushkin does not seem to take it, or Olga, seriously — but it's played rather more straight in the opera and in this performance in particular.) I think one of the things I love best about it is how Hvorostovsky goes all stiff and blank after Lensky's death, and then he sees Tatyana again and suddenly it's like his entire body language changes, becomes more fluid and supple and evocative, it's sort of amazing to watch. And that ending scene, my gosh, SO PERFECT. Has there ever been an Onegin/Tatyana with more chemistry than those two? If so I want to know about it so I can watch it :PPPPP

This week also I found this Stovhus/Stoyanova Onegin here which is sooooo not a good first Onegin (it would be super confusing) but which I had an awful lot of fun watching. Like the Keenlyside/Stoyanova Royal Opera House version I ranted about a while back, it's again one of these retrospective things where the characters are looking back (and actually more complicated than that, as there's a prologue that begins the opera at the beginning of the last scene, and then rewinds via memories to the beginning as we know it). Bo Skovhus is directed kind of weirdly as Onegin, I thought — I felt like he was sort of bouncing between being a kind of likeable geek and a very drunk confused person (and neither of which I feel like gives rise to the fundamentally unlikeable nature that underlies Onegin, and that Hvorostovsky can do so well). Stoyanova is brilliant and I love her Tatyana a lot. And it can't be denied that Skovhus and Stoyanova have the chemistry required to sell it.

I have a weakness for this staging, too, because it's got a young-or-at-least-their-own-age Gremin that Tatyana seems genuinely fond of. I have basically a huge soft spot for Gremin because as canon goes, Tatyana is stuck with him, so he might as well be someone that she legit likes and has chemistry with, and usually he's cast as some super old guy where it's impossible to imagine any chemistry whatsoever — which to be fair is at least mildly supported by Pushkin. But anyway Stoyanova and Petrenko do have chemistry and what appears to be genuine emotion in the Gremins' marriage.

ahhhhh this opera!!
cahn: (Default)
4/5 - The Royal Opera version from 2013. I really wanted to see this one because, well, Keenlyside, and the conceit sounded interesting. Then I read a whole bunch of lukewarm reviews, so I delayed buying it sight unseen (which I might otherwise have done). Well, someone finally put it up on youtube (first part here) and now I am gonna have to buy it, because I thought it was completely fabulous (with one exception I will talk about). (No subtitles on this one either, sorry! I watched it with a browser tab open to the libretto in English.)

The conceit is that Keenlyside and Stoyanova are way too old to play the teenager versions of Onegin and Tatiana, so they have dancers that double as the younger selves (while Keenlyside and Stoyanova, of course, sing all the lines). It changes the whole thrust of the opera -- what is a fairly straightforward driving sequence of events in the original becomes instead a retrospective of regret. I think it would be a terrible first exposure to this opera (for which I'd absolutely recommend the Met version with Fleming and Hvorotovsky), but as a second one (which it was for me, or okay maybe the fourth or so) it's fabulous, it really brings out the themes of loss and regret from the very beginning; I find it a really interesting alternate interpretation.

Pavol Breslik as Lensky is very different from Ramon Vargas' Met Lensky (whom I also love), and I really love Breslik's way-too-sure-of-himself over-passionate bad-poet vibe, especially the parts where his aria to Olga is performed from a bit of paper where he's written it down, and where it turns out he's written the poem for Tatiana's birthday and mouths the poem while it's being sung, hee! I absolutely adore what Elena Maximova and the direction has done with Olga... I think the predominant interpretation (certainly the one the Met used) is that Olga is a shallow flirt [ETA 2018: I wouldn't say that now, but at least I'd say not overly complicated with respect to love], but here she gets depths -- certain lines in the libretto are brought out with the distinct implications that she's been a bit stampeded into this engagement by everyone's expectations, that she's not always comfortable with Lensky's suffocating attentions... I just fell in love with her character, after not liking her much in the Met version. [ETA 2018: In retrospect I didn't like her much in the Met version because I was over-reading Pushkin into her. I like her now!]

There are so many little interpretive bits that I loved. Stoyanova and her double (Vigdis Hentze Olsen) embracing in a rare moment of acknowledging each other as Stoyanova sings of how she is all alone. Keenlyside, when his declaration of love is met by Stoyanova showing him her past letter, recoiling in horror. LOVE IT. I also felt that the cinematography was excellent and really pointed up a lot of the interpretive choices that were being made.

I actually liked Breslik remaining on stage after the duel, as I felt it really underlined that the duel is at the heart of the opera -- although I can see why others thought it ham-handed. And it's true that I started worrying halfway through the last act that he must get really bored. Hopefully he could maybe take a nap or something?

I spent the entire time watching this squeeing quietly to myself about how much I loved it (except, okay, the Polonaise was a little... obvious?...I could have done without it), and then the ending happened and I started giggling, which was not the intention. I have problems with the ending in general, as I feel like Tchaikovsky really overdid the romanticism to begin with, but bringing in Prince Gremin to hear Onegin and Tatiana sing at top impassioned volume about their love for each other... just... didn't work. Especially the bit where Tatiana sees him but... keeps... singing, and at the same time Onegin doesn't apparently see him at all (which is somewhat OOC, for one thing). It just didn't work. I know why they did it -- to end with the tragic tableau of all three of them despairing -- and that was pretty cool actually -- but the leadup to it didn't work at all. It almost works if I pretend that Gremin is Tatiana's hallucination/construct, which in a production all about memory constructs and the past impinging on the present is less weird than it might seem at first glance. But yeah... the staging of the conclusion in the Met version was way better.

And, okay, Keenlyside and Stoyanova are brilliant singers and actors, but I must admit that I didn't get any chemistry between them at *all* (a lot of *emotion* between them, which was awesome, but no sexual chemistry). I mean, I could see that being part of the point...that anything that could have been between them was destroyed by what happened... but I think I was spoiled by the super chemistry between Fleming and Hvorotovsky in this regard. And I often find Keenlyside very *likeable*, as I did here, which isn't, uh, how I think I'm supposed to feel about Onegin. (It's something about his physical presence, I think. When I just listen to the audio, his Onegin is superb. But... I didn't get that vibe from his Don Giovanni. So in conclusion: I just don't know.)

Also now I'm annoyed because I can't find either my Met DVD or either of my copies of the Pushkin. It's like someone who was completely obsessed with Eugene Onegin carried them off somewhere to keep them secret and safe! Unfortunately... there's only one person in my house who fills that description...
cahn: (Default)
The Pushkin verse-novel (4/5), the Tchaikovsky opera (4/5), the Met production of the opera (5/5), the Baden-Baden (1998) production of the opera (4/5)

My first introduction to Onegin was in college. One of my home teachers at the time (LDS term for "assigned male go-to/friend" — all active adult LDS are assigned as a "home teacher" (men) or "visiting teacher" (women) to others in the ward, and it is an AWESOME program which means you are guaranteed at least one or two instant friends, but this is not the post for it) was a dancer in a very highly-regarded ballet company, and he happened to mention that they were doing an absolutely amazing production of Onegin and that I should go see it. K was out of the country at the time, and I think I hadn't yet gotten to be friends with J, so I dragged my roommate.

She enjoyed it, but I was overwhelmed. It was the first professional ballet performance I'd ever been to, and it was wonderful. I don't remember anything specific about it now, but I remember that overwhelming thought of oh, oh, THIS is what dance is about, this is why people love it! I then went straight to K's bookshelf (which I was keeping at the time) and read her copy of Pushkin straight through. …I was underwhelmed, but it was nice enough, I guess.

Then I forgot all about it.

So, more than fifteen years later, I was browsing Simon Keenlyside clips on YouTube, as I do, and happened to notice he was in a production of Tchaikovsky's Onegin.

(It has not escaped me that I am sort of following the romantic line of the story. I tried a little to see if I could fit a duel in, but none of my friends are the dueling sort… And of course what with YouTube and Amazon and such, having an obsession is much friendlier now than it was back in the 90's.)

Cut for length. )

(I think this is the last of my August-ish queued posts. (Way behind on life; have I mentioned that?) This one I was saving because I was going to buy and watch the Keenlyside version first, but it's become clear that this is not happening for a very long time.)

Profile

cahn: (Default)
cahn

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516171819 2021
222324 25262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 02:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios