Background: The kids' school has a topic for "Unit" every trimester that a lot of their work (reading, writing, some math) revolves around. These topics range from time/geographic periods ('Colonial America') to geography ('Asia') to science ('Space') to social science ('Business and Economics'). (I have some issues with this way of doing things, but that's a whole separate post.) Anyway, for Reasons, they have had to come up with a new topic this year, and E's 7/8 class is doing "World Fairs" as their new topic.
Me: I know E's teacher is all about World Fairs and I know she is great and will do a good job. But I feel like if we had a different teacher who wasn't so into World Fairs, they wouldn't do such a good job and another topic would be better.
Me: Like... the Enlightenment!
D: Heh, you could teach that! But you'd have to restrain yourself from making everything about Frederick the Great.
Me: But that's the thing! Everyone does relate to each other in this time period! Voltaire -- and his partner Émilie du Châtelet, who was heavily involved in the discourse of conservation of energy and momentum -- well, I've told you Voltaire had a thing with Fritz -- and then there's Empress Maria Theresa, who went to war with him a few times -- and Catherine the Great --
D, meditatively: You know --
Me: *am innocently not warned even though this is the same tone of voice that is often followed by, say, a bad pun*
D: -- it's impressive how everyone from this 'the Great' family is so famous!
Me: *splutters*
D, thoughtfully: But of course there's probably selection bias, as the ones who aren't famous don't get mentioned. You never see 'Bob the Great' in the history books...
Me: *splutters more*
Me: I know E's teacher is all about World Fairs and I know she is great and will do a good job. But I feel like if we had a different teacher who wasn't so into World Fairs, they wouldn't do such a good job and another topic would be better.
Me: Like... the Enlightenment!
D: Heh, you could teach that! But you'd have to restrain yourself from making everything about Frederick the Great.
Me: But that's the thing! Everyone does relate to each other in this time period! Voltaire -- and his partner Émilie du Châtelet, who was heavily involved in the discourse of conservation of energy and momentum -- well, I've told you Voltaire had a thing with Fritz -- and then there's Empress Maria Theresa, who went to war with him a few times -- and Catherine the Great --
D, meditatively: You know --
Me: *am innocently not warned even though this is the same tone of voice that is often followed by, say, a bad pun*
D: -- it's impressive how everyone from this 'the Great' family is so famous!
Me: *splutters*
D, thoughtfully: But of course there's probably selection bias, as the ones who aren't famous don't get mentioned. You never see 'Bob the Great' in the history books...
Me: *splutters more*
Re: Essex Erections: The Original
Date: 2024-01-11 05:01 pm (UTC)Anyway, this post mortem fandom must always be kept in mind. Because the main reason why teen Frances and teen Bob were maried by their respective families was because Robert Cecil - who had been Essex' main rival back in the Elizabethan day and was very much blamed by the people for his downfall (unnecessarily so, since Essex did most it of it himself, but the evil advisor trope is so beloved, especially since they didn't want to blame Good Queen Bess) - had married one of hs sons to Frances' older sister, and suggested the match to James as a way to reconcile himself to the Essex fans and the Essex family. Basically they'd be in laws. Robert Cecil as the Earl of Salisbury had become James' most important advisor, so James okayed it as a good idea to spread harmony among his new courtiers. (Salisbury was dead when the whole Somerset-Overbury thing went down, which was part of the problem, because there was no one to replace him till young George Villiers/Buckingham thought he could be Carr and Cecil BOTH for James, and then for Charles.)
Also, Essex fandom along with traditional misogyny and fear of women who cast doubt on your sexual prowess was a big reason - when combined of "OMG not the Howards and their crypto Catholicism, DOWN WITH SPAIN!" feeling - why so many people sided with Bob even before the "Overbury was poisoned!" news made the rounds. Surely the son of the wonderful Essex could not help being a wonderful manly guy himself!
And then when he became the first army leader for the Parliamentarians, every Civil War era scribe was retrospectively on his side as well. The fact that he managed to fuck up his second marriage, too, was regarded as incidental.
Back one more time to Elizabethan Essex: whenever I see someone, be they a biographer, historian or contemporary, talk about how sure, he was rash, but at least he was always honest, not calculating like the Cecils and Bacons of the Elizabethan world, I roll my eyes, because: just ask poor Dr. Lopes how good a guy Essex was. Ugh.
Re: Essex Erections: The Original
Date: 2024-01-12 03:05 pm (UTC)Re: Essex Erections: The Original
Date: 2024-01-12 04:59 pm (UTC)