Background: The kids' school has a topic for "Unit" every trimester that a lot of their work (reading, writing, some math) revolves around. These topics range from time/geographic periods ('Colonial America') to geography ('Asia') to science ('Space') to social science ('Business and Economics'). (I have some issues with this way of doing things, but that's a whole separate post.) Anyway, for Reasons, they have had to come up with a new topic this year, and E's 7/8 class is doing "World Fairs" as their new topic.
Me: I know E's teacher is all about World Fairs and I know she is great and will do a good job. But I feel like if we had a different teacher who wasn't so into World Fairs, they wouldn't do such a good job and another topic would be better.
Me: Like... the Enlightenment!
D: Heh, you could teach that! But you'd have to restrain yourself from making everything about Frederick the Great.
Me: But that's the thing! Everyone does relate to each other in this time period! Voltaire -- and his partner Émilie du Châtelet, who was heavily involved in the discourse of conservation of energy and momentum -- well, I've told you Voltaire had a thing with Fritz -- and then there's Empress Maria Theresa, who went to war with him a few times -- and Catherine the Great --
D, meditatively: You know --
Me: *am innocently not warned even though this is the same tone of voice that is often followed by, say, a bad pun*
D: -- it's impressive how everyone from this 'the Great' family is so famous!
Me: *splutters*
D, thoughtfully: But of course there's probably selection bias, as the ones who aren't famous don't get mentioned. You never see 'Bob the Great' in the history books...
Me: *splutters more*
Me: I know E's teacher is all about World Fairs and I know she is great and will do a good job. But I feel like if we had a different teacher who wasn't so into World Fairs, they wouldn't do such a good job and another topic would be better.
Me: Like... the Enlightenment!
D: Heh, you could teach that! But you'd have to restrain yourself from making everything about Frederick the Great.
Me: But that's the thing! Everyone does relate to each other in this time period! Voltaire -- and his partner Émilie du Châtelet, who was heavily involved in the discourse of conservation of energy and momentum -- well, I've told you Voltaire had a thing with Fritz -- and then there's Empress Maria Theresa, who went to war with him a few times -- and Catherine the Great --
D, meditatively: You know --
Me: *am innocently not warned even though this is the same tone of voice that is often followed by, say, a bad pun*
D: -- it's impressive how everyone from this 'the Great' family is so famous!
Me: *splutters*
D, thoughtfully: But of course there's probably selection bias, as the ones who aren't famous don't get mentioned. You never see 'Bob the Great' in the history books...
Me: *splutters more*
Re: Kidnapping and forced conversion to Catholicism
Date: 2023-12-14 08:35 am (UTC)LOL. What I'd like to know is how people thought this particular kidnapping scheme would work out - I mean, other than Carl August becoming an obedient Son of Rome, obviously. (BTW: when I wonder whether FW truly thought Fritz would end up as an obedient RC, knowing Fritz and his obstinacy, when believing in the 1718/1719 "plot", I remind myself FW probably thought Fritz would be capable of it if only to spite him.) In August 3 telling Fritz "Hand back Saxony, or your baby grand nephew will go to mass as soon as he can walk?"
Re: Kidnapping and forced conversion to Catholicism
Date: 2023-12-14 09:15 pm (UTC)As a reminder to
This is a family that has close ties to Fritz, is what I'm saying.
So the Saxons and Austrians have every reason to believe that if the Brunswick family gets its way, and the regency is handed over to Anna Amalia and her father (Charlotte's husband), Weimar will be on the side of Fritz in this war (and future wars).
To counter that, FS makes August III co-regent over Carl August, and it's quite understandable that kidnapping the baby would not only lead to his conversion to Catholicism, but to greater control by August over Weimar foreign policy and troop commitment. It would also make Weimar a more natural ally for Austria and Saxony in future wars. Even if the Treaty of Westphalia means Carl August can't change the local religion for his subjects, a conversion by a ruling prince can have foreign policy implications (that's actually why many of the German princes, including the Hohenzollerns way back when, converted in the first place).
"Hand back Saxony, or your baby grand nephew will go to mass as soon as he can walk?"
This made me laugh, but I think everyone, even August III, knew that argument would just result in Fritz justifying the occupation of Saxony for the Protestant cause, not in handing over Saxony. Troops. Weimar troops are where it's at.
Re: Kidnapping and forced conversion to Catholicism
Date: 2023-12-15 12:57 am (UTC)(I will always remember Ferdinand of Brunswick being a better candidate for regent than the Hohenzollern Ferdinand, but I forgot that there were so many of them...)
Re: Kidnapping and forced conversion to Catholicism
Date: 2023-12-15 01:02 am (UTC)Re: Kidnapping and forced conversion to Catholicism
Date: 2023-12-15 06:08 pm (UTC)I have Salon posts tracked and get emails for every comment (though they're autosorted to a certain folder in my email, to be read when I have time). So in a sense I am always reading, and will certainly see if I'm mentioned. But I skip or skim things I'm less interested in.
Thanks for the explanation, it did contextualize the thread for me! : )
Re: Kidnapping and forced conversion to Catholicism
Date: 2023-12-15 11:31 pm (UTC)