cahn: (Default)
[personal profile] cahn
Last post, along with the usual 18th-century suspects, included the Ottonians; changing ideas of conception and women's sexual pleasure; Isabella of Parma (the one who fell in love, and vice versa, with her husband's sister); Henry IV and Bertha (and Henry's second wife divorcing him for "unspeakable sexual acts"). (Okay, Isabella of Parma was 18th century.)

Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...

Date: 2022-12-14 05:30 pm (UTC)
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
Oh, and as for Fritz trying to dissolve his marriage: if he had wanted to after his father's death, he could have done it.

Indeed, but I have a very faint memory of reading that he tried it/talked about it in the 1730s. But that could have been another unreliable modern "historian", or it could have been something I'm confusing with something else.

It's not like EC was the aunt of Charles V.

*snort*

Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...

Date: 2022-12-14 05:42 pm (UTC)
selenak: (Default)
From: [personal profile] selenak
Oh, I could buy him talking about it in the 1730s to some friends. (Though the way I recall it is him saying it will be goodbye, Madame, as soon as FW croaks it, which his listeners understood to mean he won't live with her anymore, not that he'd divorce her.) But not when he could actually do it, from the 1740s onwards.

And let's not forget there are examples of Protestant royal divorces: his grandfather G1 did get divorced from poor SD the older. G3's sister who was married to Christian of Denmark got divorced. And of course, nephew FW2 from his first wife.

Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...

Date: 2022-12-14 05:45 pm (UTC)
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
But not when he could actually do it, from the 1740s onwards.

No, by then he didn't need to, he had all the power, and she hadn't actually done anything wrong. And that's what I took "tried to dissolve" to mean--if he'd "tried" after 1740, he presumably would have succeeded. And I feel like I remember him exploring his options in the 1730s, although I could be wrong.

Re: Nancy Goldstone has nothing on this one...

Date: 2022-12-14 05:48 pm (UTC)
selenak: (Default)
From: [personal profile] selenak
Though it would have to be awfully discreet exploring, given in any event he would have needed FW's permission (just as FW2 needed his, and Heinrich, too, hence no divorced Mina), and he must have known that short of EC blatantly cheating on him with the French ambassador in front of FW, no permission would have been given.

Profile

cahn: (Default)
cahn

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 12 3 456
78910111213
1415 1617181920
2122232425 2627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 30th, 2025 11:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios