cahn: (Default)
[personal profile] cahn
...yes, I am this much behind :P

December reading that I forgot to post about in December

I had beta reading I didn't post about, plus one more!

Red, White, and Royal Blue (McQuiston) - This wish-fulfillment exercise where a serial-numbers-filed-off female president's son has a gay romance with a prince of England was quite cute! I read people's reviews before reading it and many people found it a little too... wish-fulfillment... given the last several years... and while it didn't bother me early on, it did start being a little too much that way for me in the last half, idk why it took until then. Also, I'd heard that it was very light on actual knowledge about British politics but given that my knowledge is probably lighter, that didn't bother me too much, but it did bother me that I felt weirdly like Prince Henry didn't actually sound like any sort of British person to me -- like, he would occasionally use British-English words, but something about the diction otherwise sounded very American. Did anyone else have that problem?

Call Me By Your Name - uh, DNF. I would have been all over this book twenty years ago; at this point in my life adolescent sexual angst (gay in this case, but also would apply to het) wasn't something I wanted to read a whole book about unless it was written in Gilded Age Wharton pastiche in which case bring it on!!

Book of Mormon - Because I had committed to run this church reading group, I finally read the whole thing from 1 Nephi to the end of Moroni for the first time in more than fifteen years. (It comes around every four years in the scripture rotation, and many members read it every year. My not reading it has been something of a personal act of quiet intransigence, plus which I honestly don't think I could have taken it before last year.) It was... an interesting experience. There are some things about it that are really compelling, actually; reading it in 2020, I was particularly struck by, and posted about various times in reading group, the repeated message over many books and generations that reaching out to the Other, the one who is unlike you and whose views you may not understand or accept, is important; and when one turns away from the Other, that is the start of a process that leads to cataclysm. (Particularly resonant in this year because the reading group I was heading has a large political variety, even if we don't talk about it explicitly.)

January reading

Candide (Voltaire) - Norton Critical Edition - okay, I haven't finished all the essays at the back, but I did finish Candide, which was much funnier a) now that I'm in the middle of a Voltaire bio b) with the footnotes. (I got this edition because of the footnotes.) One day I will get around to putting my writeup in [community profile] rheinsberg...

Gap Cycle books 1-3 (Donaldson): The Real Story (reread-skim), Forbidden Knowledge (reread), and A Dark and Hungry God Arises - so [personal profile] selenak had this post on Die Walküre, which is one of my favorite operas ever, and in addition to my snarfing up the Met 2011 one with Kaufmann/Terfel/Voigt/Blythe (which I liked! but which did not unseat the Chereau in my heart! but hopefully I will post more on this later) I of course was reminded of the excellent Ring synopsis at the end of The Real Story, and [personal profile] iberiandoctor had also recommended to me, and from there I had to read the thing.

Basically, the five-book Gap series is space opera inspired by and in dialogue with the Ring Cycle, although I'm not sure I'd call it Space AU Ring Cycle, because Donaldson really does an excellent job of broadening and expanding the universe and the characters so that it's more than just a Ring retelling, even a worldbuilding-heavy one, but rather something that is its own creation where you can see the roots of the Ring in it. It's really twisty and dense and plot-and-worldbuilding-heavy and I'm enjoying the heck out of it.

On the other hand...! D described it as "classic Donaldson," in that everyone just is put in horrible situations all the time so that they can angst dreadfully about it. As part of this, there is a lot of rape. There is a lot of rape and/or seriously nonconsensual sex -- or, well, the first two books are particularly awful that way, but actually I'm midway through book 4 and I don't think any rape has happened since... book 2?... so hopefully we're out of that part -- and various men (who are not raped, although one of them has memories of it) have things happen to them that... are described as "like rape." (This has not stopped, midway through book 4.) Yeah, these books are like that. Very 90's. I give Donaldson points for saying in the afterword to The Real Story that he worried when he wrote it that people would side-eye his subconscious. I mean... self-awareness is half the battle? :P

It's also very 90's in the assumptions it makes about men and women and the way it's totally trying to be feminist (and, like, is an improvement on other stuff I was reading at the time, to be fair) by having a few awesome kick-butt women characters (basically the Sieglinde and Brünnhilde and Valkyrie-sisters and Norn characters) but... idk... it's a universe that has built into it a lot of male-power-dominating assumptions (as you can kind of see from all the rape going on) in ways that are sort of brought out given that the last space operas I read were Memory Called Empire and the Ancillary series, neither of which... are like that.

Also -- and this was the most annoying thing of this type -- he makes Fricka a GUY! I mean, a slimy guy, but WTF. Fricka is awesome and I am not cool with her part being given to a guy, even if he's also made Fricka a bad (or at least slimy) guy, which ALSO WTF (but which makes more sense under the rules of his universe). This would have been less not-OK if, say, Loge had been female, but noooooo.

(Also, the Wotan analogue is sooooo much more noble and awesome than his opera counterpart, it's a little annoying also.)

This is the third time I've attempted it (the first time I couldn't find all five books, the second time I lost the third book and only found it months later, at which point I'd lost my momentum) so we'll see if I finish it this time... I'm enjoying it a lot and I hope to finish it! But yeah, it's very 90's and although I am enjoying it because I first read the first of these in the 90's, I would really feel very weird recommending it to anyone else in 2021.

Date: 2021-02-18 05:01 pm (UTC)
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
From: [personal profile] sophia_sol
Candide! I read that back in university and was delightedly astonished at how funny it was. And I didn't even have any additional context. I'm impressed that it can be even funnier with context!

Date: 2021-02-20 02:54 am (UTC)
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
From: [personal profile] sophia_sol
hahahaha this all seems extremely Voltaire!

I vaguely recall there was an Anabaptist character in Candide who actually got a pretty positive portrayal, despite prevailing opinions on anabaptists at the time, so I wonder who the Anabaptist was he met who was such a great guy :P

Date: 2021-02-21 04:01 pm (UTC)
sophia_sol: photo of a 19th century ivory carving of a fat bird (Default)
From: [personal profile] sophia_sol
ahaha that footnote is.......technically accurate but a bit misleading. Although strong strands of Anabaptism developed in the Low Countries in the 16th & 17th centuries, they were persecuted there and most left for other places long before Voltaire's era! Some did remain, and by the 18th century they were mostly tolerated in Holland and were indeed productive members of society, but a) the religious tolerance was new and b) the productive members of society was not new. Also the Dutch Anabaptists of that era were not very religiously tolerant of each other :P

Date: 2021-02-18 08:34 pm (UTC)
leaflemming: (Default)
From: [personal profile] leaflemming
Thanks for those Gap comments. I remember arguing in frustration with a church friend in my teens over whether the rape early in the first Thomas Covenant book was a good reason to stop reading the series -- I was 16 and it seemed blindingly obvious to me that if you couldn't deal with rape as a character's sin, you weren't really willing to confront the idea of sin at all. I thought Donaldson was being brilliantly bold. And then every other thing he ever wrote seemed to turn either on rape, or some form of murky sexual consent violation, and I gradually found myself... not so much having my eyes opened to the associated male gaze/male mindset issues, as just losing the stomach for it. The second Gap book was where I finally gave up and stopped reading him. I'll be very interested to see what your thoughts are if/when you finish the series!

Date: 2021-02-19 03:30 am (UTC)
iberiandoctor: (Default)
From: [personal profile] iberiandoctor
Oh man, I feel I need to apologise for being responsible for what looks like at least 50% of your December and January reading! +facepalm+

You might not be surprised to learn my feelings about RW&RB the novel mirror yours, though you are being overly kind about my CMBYN fic! My enthusiasm for the fandom is, it's true, centred principally around the gorgeously-shot and beautifully-acted movie, though I will say I enjoyed the novel a great deal (I was that weird teen who didn't read a lot of explicit sexual angst, not unless you count the lowkey UST in the Arthurian cycle?). I mean, I found Aciman's prose is lovely and immersive and fresh, and I really enjoyed his young bisexual male protagonist (vs Elio's straight older protagonist dad in the sequel, which was very much a paint-by-numbers heterosexual relationship).

I think I'm sorriest about sending you back into the Gap cycle! Everything you said about Donaldson's torture porn and 90s-datedness and the datedness of the male-power-dominated worldbuilding sounded like something I remembered. I'm hoping you are at least having fun with worldbuilding and politics, and feel as if the torture porn is more coherently integrated into this part of the cycle, where the whole operatic metaphor comes together? I remember enjoying those aspects, very much -- but I obviously haven't read this in ages and ages, and it may well be that it just doesn't hold up; my taste for male-power-dominated worldbuilding has definitely diminished over the years. Also, I had forgotten about Fricka -- WTAF is up with that, Donaldson? +triple facepalm+

Profile

cahn: (Default)
cahn

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516171819 2021
222324 25262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 09:43 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios