Re: Preuß,in fairness, he did a lot of original research which later biographers drew from. As the edition of the Katte tribunal protocols says, he was the first biographer to have access to them, for example; earlier writings on the subject had to rely on hearsay and anonymous pamphlets. And there may even be gems there, despite his worhip of his subject, so I'll try intermittently, it's just that I find the 19th century nationalism hard to stomach.
Also, with his basic belief that Fritz can do no wrong and is truth incarnated, he tranfers errors. Remember, in the 7 Years War, one of Fritz' most efficient propagana writings was a supposed letter from MT to the Marquise de Pompadour calling her "dear sister". This was, depending on your pov, forgery in the service of political propaganda or satire, but it definitely wasn't the real deal. (We do have the entire correspondance between the Marquise and Vienna documented. The only direct letter of hers to MT, and not the other way around, was thanking her for the present of an ebony cabinet. Otherwise, Reinette corresponded with Kaunitz (basically Austria's PM, cahnstill remember it mentioning that the dear sister" letter is the 18th century of an urban legend starting out as political propaganda.)
Or: like I said, I noted - and was surprised - that he quotes from Fritz' conversations with Catt (naming Catt's memoirs as the source) before these were published, then found the explanation in the preface (the memoirs were in the Prussian State Archive and Preuß was given access to them). I don't blame him for being thrilled - getting your hands on such a document with lots of surely authentic Fritz conversations, what a find! But it means that he accepts anything Fritz says here (or that, as we now know, Catt has him say) without question, including the AW-editing-out-of-history thing where Heinrich, not AW, is declared by Fritz to have been FW's favourite. (Which Preuß with his access to the state archive, which I assume back then had the same FW letters Ziebura and other modern biographers whote from, could have counterchecked. But if the One King says it...)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: Some biographers, ugh
Date: 2020-01-27 07:30 am (UTC)Also, with his basic belief that Fritz can do no wrong and is truth incarnated, he tranfers errors. Remember, in the 7 Years War, one of Fritz' most efficient propagana writings was a supposed letter from MT to the Marquise de Pompadour calling her "dear sister". This was, depending on your pov, forgery in the service of political propaganda or satire, but it definitely wasn't the real deal. (We do have the entire correspondance between the Marquise and Vienna documented. The only direct letter of hers to MT, and not the other way around, was thanking her for the present of an ebony cabinet. Otherwise, Reinette corresponded with Kaunitz (basically Austria's PM,
Or: like I said, I noted - and was surprised - that he quotes from Fritz' conversations with Catt (naming Catt's memoirs as the source) before these were published, then found the explanation in the preface (the memoirs were in the Prussian State Archive and Preuß was given access to them). I don't blame him for being thrilled - getting your hands on such a document with lots of surely authentic Fritz conversations, what a find! But it means that he accepts anything Fritz says here (or that, as we now know, Catt has him say) without question, including the AW-editing-out-of-history thing where Heinrich, not AW, is declared by Fritz to have been FW's favourite. (Which Preuß with his access to the state archive, which I assume back then had the same FW letters Ziebura and other modern biographers whote from, could have counterchecked. But if the One King says it...)