(no subject)

[cahn]

This is totally too good to keep to myself: on my "I showed my family opera clips" post, mildred_of_midgard and selenak are talking about Frederick the Great (by way of Don Carlo, of course) and it is like this amazing virtuoso spontaneous thing and whoa

Things I knew about Frederick the Great before a year ago: he was king of... Prussia??

Additional things I knew about Frederick the Great before the last couple of days: selenak informed me last year that he and his dad may well have been at least somewhat the inspiration for Schiller's Don Carlos, and everything that goes with that: his dad (Friedrich Wilhelm, henceforth FW) was majorly awful, he had a boyfriend (Katte) who was horribly killed by his dad

Only a partial list of the additional things I now know about Frederick the Great (henceforth "Fritz") and associated historical figures due to mildred and selenak:
-Fritz and Katte's escape plan (which resulted in Katte's execution) was... really, really boneheaded. As boneheaded as opera plots! :P
-Katte was in the process of destroying 1,500 letters when he got caught (! puts all those letters in Don Carlos into perspective) (ETA: but also see mildred's comment below)
-Fritz wrote opera libretti and so did his sister
-Fritz decided to use himself as an experimental test subject to see if it was entirely possible to do without sleep via the application of coffee WITH PEPPERCORNS AND MUSTARD
-Fritz wrote a poem about orgasm that also reads as if he's never actually, like, had sex (although that was not in this post, it was in the comments to this one)
-FW apparently beat up George II when they were kids
-I am totally not even going to try to summarize the discussion about FW's "rationalized sadism" and sexual hangups and the reeeeeally bizarre Dresden interlude (go down a couple of comments for the really insane stuff)
-Fritz' sister Wilhemina wrote tell-all memoirs about her totally insane family which I am SUPER going to read now, watch this space

Also, there is apparently some subplot involving Russian fanboys that introduces an entirely new cast of people which I am dying to find out about

Comments

Re: Joseph: the RATIONAL fanboy

[selenak]

Bear in mind that Louis and Marie Antoinette not being able to procreate was a serious political, not just private issue. Traditionally, such things led to marriages getting annulled, and the Austria/France alliance was pretty new and revolutionary, as Mildred explained above; there was a lot riding on it. Still, poor Antoinette who'd been 15 when marrying Louis, I think, and thus was only in her early 20s at the point where her mother must have decided she couldn't make heads or tails out of the ambassador's reports as to what the hell the problem was and needed to send brother Joseph to sort everyone out.

Which Joseph did, incidentally. (Not least because he realised there might be a medical issue and had a doctor perform an operation on Louis' penis.) Complete penetration, ejaculation, and subsequent procreation ensued. The other thing Joseph's visit to Paris was memorable for was leaving a Memorandum in which he told both his brother-in-law and his little sister that they needed to get some reforms going or else there was a road to disaster. This, famously, they did not listen to.

Re: Joseph: the RATIONAL fanboy

[cahn]

...so was the operation or sex training, or both, what was needed?

The other thing Joseph's visit to Paris was memorable for was leaving a Memorandum in which he told both his brother-in-law and his little sister that they needed to get some reforms going or else there was a road to disaster. This, famously, they did not listen to.

I don't know why this made the comment 1000% more awesome, but it totally did.

Re: Joseph: the RATIONAL fanboy

[selenak]

As far as I recall, both, as in, there had been a medical problem, but also Louis didn't have a clue. Which, yes,is ironic given his grandfather (Louis XV) was one of the most infamous "screws everything which moves" types, and you'd think it didn't Joseph as the Dr. Ruth of Rokoko times to instruct a Frenchman in lovemaking, but evidently, national clichés notwithstanding….

Re: Joseph: the RATIONAL fanboy

[cahn]

I mean. I get what you say about it all being important for the succession etc. but I have this image in my head of the guy in Amadeus instructing his brother-in-law in how to have sex and I'm just totally dying here.

Re: Joseph: the RATIONAL fanboy

[selenak]

Such was my sinister intention. :) The Amadeus version would have had Mozart to back him up (in theory), though; remember, Mozart has an argument with a bunch of Italian composers in front of Joseph about love being a German virtue (Italians, saracastic: yeah, sure, we Italians know nothing about love! Mozart: No, you don't!). (Which might even be based on something Mozart actually said or wrote in a letter, because I recall something along that line from a childern's book about Mozart which I read as a kid a decade before Peter Shaffer wrote Amadeus. (Shaffer is one of those writers taking great liberties who still clearly did their research; note that Joseph in his few scenes in the movie is wearing modelled-on-Fritz simple uniform, for example.)

On a less hilarious note, Joseph in the end was a tragic figure, because his reforms were deeply unpopular, and his self composed epitaph read "here lies Joseph, who failed in everything he wanted to do"; then, when he was succeeded by his younger brother who was one of the most reactionary Habsburgs ever, Joseph post mortem became "the people's Emperor" (Volkskaiser), anecdotes from his travels and endeavours abounded, and retrospectively he became beloved. He was certainly hands down the brightest of Maria Theresia's kids. (That memorandum to Little sis and her husband about reforms they should understake in France was over thirty hand written pages. If they'd taken him as seriously about that as they did about sex...)

Re: Joseph: the RATIONAL fanboy

[mildred_of_midgard]

In your opinion, were those suggestions practicable? Because my French Revolution-fu is weak, and I'm not saying Louis was especially good at leadership, but my hazy memories are that every time Louis did try to change something, he got stymied by the nobility.

Re: Joseph: the RATIONAL fanboy

[selenak]

My own impression was that Louis mostly paid for his predecessor's sins and yes, he did try some things, but was Joseph was reccommending was, among other things, austerity in life style, and that at least would have helped with the public perception problem which Marie Antoinette had even before the Revolution started. And the whole memorandum actually does contain the sentence: "»Ich zittere jetzt für Dich, denn so kann es nicht weitergehen; la révolution sera cruelle si vous ne la préparez.« - "I tremble now for you, because it can't continue like this; the revolution will be cruel if you don't prepare yourself".

Re: Joseph: the RATIONAL fanboy

[mildred_of_midgard]

Oh, Marie Antoinette's PR was the one thing I thought about mentioning when this whole discussion about France and reforms started. I grant you that would have been an A+ move.

Well spotted, Joseph.

Just checked his death date: 1790. Wow.