Much earlier, when he was in his mid twenties (the younger people are, of course, the more fluid their religious/spiritual beliefs). As we saw in the Suhm write-up, he went from not being sure he had an immortal soul, to being convinced by Wolff via Suhm's translation in 1736 that he did, and then just a couple years later, after reading more widely of skeptical philosophy, switching to definitely not believing in an immortal soul.
I don't see any evidence that he changed his mind or even had uncertainty after 1740; that reads like 100% wishful thinking on Catt's part. Especially since so much of his argument is "Well, *I* think he sounded uncertain, mostly because he sounded so extremely certain and vehement that I don't think he'd keep arguing with me unless he wanted to be convinced."
Riiiight. Works both ways, Catt. Maybe you're uncertain, did you think of that? No, of course you didn't.
Re: Henri de Catt
Date: 2020-01-27 09:03 pm (UTC)I don't see any evidence that he changed his mind or even had uncertainty after 1740; that reads like 100% wishful thinking on Catt's part. Especially since so much of his argument is "Well, *I* think he sounded uncertain, mostly because he sounded so extremely certain and vehement that I don't think he'd keep arguing with me unless he wanted to be convinced."
Riiiight. Works both ways, Catt. Maybe you're uncertain, did you think of that? No, of course you didn't.