The antisemitism was in the book about the Pages, not in Des Champs' memoirs
Right, right, right, getting confused in my memory. *facepalm*
methinks it's aware of the problem there.
Well, that's something.
And while some of those presents were extravagant - fireworks for little AW, piglets (if Felis right re: "Fröschlinge") set loose in the palace - a Potsdam Giant was never among them. :)
Hee! Indeed not.
Re: ennoblement - like I said elsewhere, since the former Mrs. Fredersdorf when remarrying is listed as Mrs. Fredersdorf and not "von" Fredersdorf, and she ought to know, I was always reasonably sure he didn't get ennobled.
A convincing argument, but I did not know that when writing "Pulvis et Umbra", only one month into salon. ;)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: Des Champs I: I'm Innocent! Everyone else was guilty. Except Le Diable.
Right, right, right, getting confused in my memory. *facepalm*
methinks it's aware of the problem there.
Well, that's something.
And while some of those presents were extravagant - fireworks for little AW, piglets (if Felis right re: "Fröschlinge") set loose in the palace - a Potsdam Giant was never among them. :)
Hee! Indeed not.
Re: ennoblement - like I said elsewhere, since the former Mrs. Fredersdorf when remarrying is listed as Mrs. Fredersdorf and not "von" Fredersdorf, and she ought to know, I was always reasonably sure he didn't get ennobled.
A convincing argument, but I did not know that when writing "Pulvis et Umbra", only one month into salon. ;)