One more detail from the 1769 version of the will:
11. I am bequeathing to my sister, the Queen of Sweden, one of my golden boxes valued at 10,000 thalers, 20 buckets of Hungarian wine and a painting of Pesne in the Sanssouci Palace, which I received from Algarotti.
Of course I got curious, so I looked it up and it's apparently this one (in colour), with the inscription Unter dem Kissen [Under the Pillow]— Ant. Pesne fecit 1706.
Oesterreicher says "A charming peasant girl in the window with her head resting on her right arm. Light and shadow have a splendid effect in this painting, the painter represented bare [bloße] nature. [He sure did.] * * The Count Algarotti bequeathed this painting to His Majesty the King.
Fritz also mentions that Algarotti offered him a Pesne painting in his last letter to Algarotti, which I assume was this one, so they had talked about it before and I'm not entirely sure if it was a formal last will thing from Algarotti or just coincided with his death.
Nevertheless, I have questions! Did Algarotti think that Fritz would simply like to have a Pesne painting or was the motif relevant innuendo? The inscription? And why on earth did Fritz bequeath it to Ulrike - did she come across it during a visit and she and Fritz talked about it? Inside joke? Does she have a connection to Algarotti at all or is it just the fact that Pesne painted it? It's not like Fritz didn't have hundreds of other paintings to give, so why this one?
Fascinating detail! Also, that's actually a beautiful painting, and strikingly different from official portraits Pesne did of the royal family. This is a painting I really like.
did she come across it during a visit?
Not unless Algarotti gave it to Fritz before 1744, when Ulrike got married and moved to Sweden. At this point, Sanssouci didn't exist yet, but Fritz could of course have hung the picture elsewhere. The 1771 visit to Brandenburg was Ulrike's first after her marriage, so she can't have seen the painting in Sanssouci at the point when Fritz is making this will. If she knows it, she must have seen it before 1744 in Potsdam and Berlin. Now, since Pesne lived in Brandenburg since F1 hired him as court painter - and was among the people FW didn't fire (he just cut the salary Pesne was receiving by half) -, this wouldn't be that difficult. Ulrike was portrayed by Pesne as were her siblings, after all. (There is a portrait of her hanging in Rheinsberg today.) Maybe, just maybe, instead of Pesne coming to her rooms, she was allowed to visit his studio and pose there, which means she could have seen the painting there?
Alas, though, dates argue against it. Pesne was appointed court painter by F1 in 1711; this painting hails from 1706. At which point young Pesne was living in....Venice. Where Algarotti is from. Which would explain why Algarotti owns a painting of the Prussian court painter to give to Fritz that the royal family doesn't own already. (Meaning young Pesne probably sold the painting back then to some Venetian noble and Algarotti, who could have seen it in Palazzo X, aquired it there.
As to why this painting of a peasant girl with cleavage, well, as my Aged Parent noted, there is no lack of female half nudes or nudes at Sanssouci anyway, enough to make him question Fritz' sexuality again. And it is a beautiful painting. I think it's probably no more complicated than Algarotti knowing Fritz would like such a good Pesne.
As to why Fritz should think Ulrike would like it, well, see above. The only way she could have known it was if she'd seen it before 1744, which could be the case if Pesne didn't sell it while in Venice but kept it and brought it with him to Berlin. Which is also possible, though in that case I question why Algarotti owned it before Fritz did.
Ohh, nice, thank you for the chronology! I assume that Fritz got the painting in 1764, when he mentions it in his letter / Algarotti died, but I didn't make the connection that Ulrike couldn't have seen in between then and 1769! Huh.
So
a) she didn't know it at all - which still begs the question why that one, because Fritz must have owned lots of other Pesne paintings if he wanted to give her one for what I'd assume is nostalgia's sake, and also, nobody else got a painting in the second will (Wilhelmine got two in the first one, a Rubens and a Van Dyck). I might have said that he was simply looking at it while writing the will, but he wrote in January again, so definitely not.
or
b) Pesne did have it with him in Berlin and she (they) knew it from back then. By the way, thanks for pointing out the Venice connection, I'd have missed that. Like you, I'm leaning towards Pesne not having it with him in Berlin, because of the date of the painting and the Algarotti connection.
Speaking of, this is what Fritz writes in June 1764: I am very much obliged to you for the part which you take in what concerns me, and for the painting by Pesne which you offer me. I am waiting to know the price to tell you where you can have it delivered. Not sure if he did pay money or got it as a gift in the end (Oesterreicher and Volz both say it was bequeathed to him), and what Algarotti said in his offer (his own letter isn't at Trier).
ETA: By the way, Oesterreicher totally agrees with you: ohnstreitig eines der schönsten Gemälde von Pesne. :) (And he speculates that it almost looks like Pesne might have been in love with the girl.)
No one else in 1769 is the Queen of Sweden who is thinking loudly about a coup again and has to be talked out of it so Russia doesn't invade and Prussia by virtue of its alliance with Russia also has to invade. I can't prove it, but Fritz does have motive to sweettalk Ulrike that year. If it were two years later, when her son is King and Ulrike has lost all her political influence, then I would qualify it as an entirely private gesture. But not in 1769.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: Various questions from Mildred
11. I am bequeathing to my sister, the Queen of Sweden, one of my golden boxes valued at 10,000 thalers, 20 buckets of Hungarian wine and a painting of Pesne in the Sanssouci Palace, which I received from Algarotti.
Of course I got curious, so I looked it up and it's apparently this one (in colour), with the inscription Unter dem Kissen [Under the Pillow]— Ant. Pesne fecit 1706.
Oesterreicher says "A charming peasant girl in the window with her head resting on her right arm. Light and shadow have a splendid effect in this painting, the painter represented bare [bloße] nature. [He sure did.] *
* The Count Algarotti bequeathed this painting to His Majesty the King.
Fritz also mentions that Algarotti offered him a Pesne painting in his last letter to Algarotti, which I assume was this one, so they had talked about it before and I'm not entirely sure if it was a formal last will thing from Algarotti or just coincided with his death.
Nevertheless, I have questions! Did Algarotti think that Fritz would simply like to have a Pesne painting or was the motif relevant innuendo? The inscription? And why on earth did Fritz bequeath it to Ulrike - did she come across it during a visit and she and Fritz talked about it? Inside joke? Does she have a connection to Algarotti at all or is it just the fact that Pesne painted it? It's not like Fritz didn't have hundreds of other paintings to give, so why this one?
Pesne painting
did she come across it during a visit?
Not unless Algarotti gave it to Fritz before 1744, when Ulrike got married and moved to Sweden. At this point, Sanssouci didn't exist yet, but Fritz could of course have hung the picture elsewhere. The 1771 visit to Brandenburg was Ulrike's first after her marriage, so she can't have seen the painting in Sanssouci at the point when Fritz is making this will. If she knows it, she must have seen it before 1744 in Potsdam and Berlin. Now, since Pesne lived in Brandenburg since F1 hired him as court painter - and was among the people FW didn't fire (he just cut the salary Pesne was receiving by half) -, this wouldn't be that difficult. Ulrike was portrayed by Pesne as were her siblings, after all. (There is a portrait of her hanging in Rheinsberg today.) Maybe, just maybe, instead of Pesne coming to her rooms, she was allowed to visit his studio and pose there, which means she could have seen the painting there?
Alas, though, dates argue against it. Pesne was appointed court painter by F1 in 1711; this painting hails from 1706. At which point young Pesne was living in....Venice. Where Algarotti is from. Which would explain why Algarotti owns a painting of the Prussian court painter to give to Fritz that the royal family doesn't own already. (Meaning young Pesne probably sold the painting back then to some Venetian noble and Algarotti, who could have seen it in Palazzo X, aquired it there.
As to why this painting of a peasant girl with cleavage, well, as my Aged Parent noted, there is no lack of female half nudes or nudes at Sanssouci anyway, enough to make him question Fritz' sexuality again. And it is a beautiful painting. I think it's probably no more complicated than Algarotti knowing Fritz would like such a good Pesne.
As to why Fritz should think Ulrike would like it, well, see above. The only way she could have known it was if she'd seen it before 1744, which could be the case if Pesne didn't sell it while in Venice but kept it and brought it with him to Berlin. Which is also possible, though in that case I question why Algarotti owned it before Fritz did.
Re: Pesne painting
So
a) she didn't know it at all - which still begs the question why that one, because Fritz must have owned lots of other Pesne paintings if he wanted to give her one for what I'd assume is nostalgia's sake, and also, nobody else got a painting in the second will (Wilhelmine got two in the first one, a Rubens and a Van Dyck). I might have said that he was simply looking at it while writing the will, but he wrote in January again, so definitely not.
or
b) Pesne did have it with him in Berlin and she (they) knew it from back then. By the way, thanks for pointing out the Venice connection, I'd have missed that. Like you, I'm leaning towards Pesne not having it with him in Berlin, because of the date of the painting and the Algarotti connection.
Speaking of, this is what Fritz writes in June 1764: I am very much obliged to you for the part which you take in what concerns me, and for the painting by Pesne which you offer me. I am waiting to know the price to tell you where you can have it delivered. Not sure if he did pay money or got it as a gift in the end (Oesterreicher and Volz both say it was bequeathed to him), and what Algarotti said in his offer (his own letter isn't at Trier).
ETA: By the way, Oesterreicher totally agrees with you: ohnstreitig eines der schönsten Gemälde von Pesne. :) (And he speculates that it almost looks like Pesne might have been in love with the girl.)
Re: Pesne painting
No one else in 1769 is the Queen of Sweden who is thinking loudly about a coup again and has to be talked out of it so Russia doesn't invade and Prussia by virtue of its alliance with Russia also has to invade. I can't prove it, but Fritz does have motive to sweettalk Ulrike that year. If it were two years later, when her son is King and Ulrike has lost all her political influence, then I would qualify it as an entirely private gesture. But not in 1769.