It's a pity we don't have the memoirs themselves. Along with a print out of AW's account of his youthful life. :)
Well, yes! But the second one we still might get someday, and the first one is presumably lost forever...but Formey's work survives and the author made a choice for which I reserve the right to hold a grudge!
So one thing that occurs to me is that I've been assuming Peter's memoirs disappeared before 1820 and the son didn't have access to them. I *think* Koser also comments that this letter is not worth anything as evidence, and I suspect he's thinking primarily of the "Sauvez-vous" part, since he calls that out in his text as a oft-repeated historical impossibility. Yeah, he calls it "unerheblich"--insignificant, unimportant.
But...what if Peter stuck to the "Sauvez-vous" story even in his memoirs?
Oh, no, wait, son says Peter was warned that Fritz had been arrested, nothing about a note from Fritz. That's also the story in Wilhelmine: specifically that a page from the house of Anhalt (wonder where she got that detail) warned Peter. Nothing about a note. Hmm. Fritz warning Peter is in Nicolai (via Hertefeld) and Catt (via who knows).
So you know what I'm thinking? I'm thinking we have another simplification here. See, after Peter spent several days in the Hague, someone must have warned him that FW was after him, and that was when he fled to Chesterfield's house. Yeah, Seckendorff, writing August 30, says Peter first went to the guy who used to be an envoy to Berlin (someone Peter presumably knew when the guy was stationed in Berlin), and then Peter got a report that the Prussians were after him, and then he fled to Chesterfield. And I think Wilhelmine and the son are conflating that story with his escape from Wesel, and having him go straight from Wesel to Chesterfield.
So possibly the memoirs are still lost by 1820, but there is a story going around, possibly put forth by Peter himself, according to which Peter left Prussia only because he was warned that someone was after him. And his son and Wilhelmine might have conflated the two escapes (interestingly, she doesn't mention her brother's role in warning him, suggesting that maybe he *didn't* tell her this story after all, and thus maybe not Catt).
Btw, Wilhelmine has Peter pretending to go after a deserter; the son has him trying out his new horse. Nicolai's story of a leisurely ride matches Peter's son's more closely, so maybe that was the story Peter told, and Wilhelmine misremembered or got a slightly different variant.
Okay, so I had been wondering when Seckendorff reports Peter missing. On August 14, Seckendorf's in Wesel with FW, and he has a several-page write-up in Forster (volume 3. starting on page 1) that I don't have time to plod through, but he mentions "Katt und Keith" as accomplices, and says--and this is odd--that of the "letzteren" know one knows anything about where he might be, but the "der erste" has gone to Nijmegen and Colonel Moulin has been sent after him to try to arrest him. Now Wilhelmine, Peter's son, *and* the official Mylius report to FW during the trial (the most reliable of all sources) all say Moulin went after Peter in the Hague, thus causing him to flee to Chesterfield. And Nijmegen is just across the Dutch border from Wesel (man, I am learning so much geography in this fandom). So Seckendorff must be swapping Katt and Keith (and remember, cahn, that these would have been pronounced much more similarly in German of the time: both one-syllable words ending in a 't' sound).
So I still don't know where Wilhelmine and Catt got their stories, but while they agree on Peter being warned, they don't agree on Fritz warning him; that's Nicolai and Catt.
Well, yes. Which is why I nominated them at [Bad username or unknown identity: unsent letters]; letters are good for venting. :)
Indeed, and I'm sorry no one is in a position to join you and request them! What can I say, we can't keep up with you. ;)
It's funny if it's contemporaries wondering how Voltaire and Fritz can cure and praise each other within two breaths, but it's heartbreaking if it's Fritz and Wilhelmine, or Fritz and Peter Keith, unable to to admit that they have these particular resentments.
I knooooow.
while he was alive he evidently tried to repress resentment sensations by falling back on the faith of his childhood
Yeah, it's so clear from the write-up that he's clinging to religion as a way of managing his emotions (fear as much as resentment) that even when I was headcanoning it as a display for FW's benefit, I was assuming he was getting *some* emotional comfort from it. Even if just the hymn-singing and something to focus on that wasn't imminent death.
But if FW hadn't intervened and he had spent those ten years in prison, well....
Yeeahh. Especially if he then ends up with a guilt-ridden and Kool-aid-drinking Fritz who is not at all what he expected, and is also more traumatized than an equally traumatized Katte is equipped to deal with.
So you know what I'm thinking? I'm thinking we have another simplification here.
Having gone through Seckendorf's report, I'm thinking you're right. Also, the fact that Peter took the time to have lunch or dinner with Keppel (the former Dutch resident in Berlin, who, however, seems to have been a Prussian citizen*, since Seckendorff mentions later FW is pissed off with "General Keppel for aiding Keith") would indicate he's at this point not yet aware that FW is after him and he has to fear for his life.
*Like Stratemann was actually a Prussian citizen but appointed envoy by the Duke of Braunschweig nonetheless.
I'm curious what you make of other details Hertefeld-via-Nicolai gives for the escape plan, but I'll fait for your comment on this before I ask.
Argh, I know you've been waiting, and I was planning on getting to it today! But then unexpected things happened, and I got unexpectedly revved up about one of the two planned meetings, and if I want to sleep, I think I have to put this off until tomorrow. But tomorrow if all goes well!
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: Sauvez-Vous!
Well, yes! But the second one we still might get someday, and the first one is presumably lost forever...but Formey's work survives and the author made a choice for which I reserve the right to hold a grudge!
So one thing that occurs to me is that I've been assuming Peter's memoirs disappeared before 1820 and the son didn't have access to them. I *think* Koser also comments that this letter is not worth anything as evidence, and I suspect he's thinking primarily of the "Sauvez-vous" part, since he calls that out in his text as a oft-repeated historical impossibility. Yeah, he calls it "unerheblich"--insignificant, unimportant.
But...what if Peter stuck to the "Sauvez-vous" story even in his memoirs?
Oh, no, wait, son says Peter was warned that Fritz had been arrested, nothing about a note from Fritz. That's also the story in Wilhelmine: specifically that a page from the house of Anhalt (wonder where she got that detail) warned Peter. Nothing about a note. Hmm. Fritz warning Peter is in Nicolai (via Hertefeld) and Catt (via who knows).
So you know what I'm thinking? I'm thinking we have another simplification here. See, after Peter spent several days in the Hague, someone must have warned him that FW was after him, and that was when he fled to Chesterfield's house. Yeah, Seckendorff, writing August 30, says Peter first went to the guy who used to be an envoy to Berlin (someone Peter presumably knew when the guy was stationed in Berlin), and then Peter got a report that the Prussians were after him, and then he fled to Chesterfield. And I think Wilhelmine and the son are conflating that story with his escape from Wesel, and having him go straight from Wesel to Chesterfield.
So possibly the memoirs are still lost by 1820, but there is a story going around, possibly put forth by Peter himself, according to which Peter left Prussia only because he was warned that someone was after him. And his son and Wilhelmine might have conflated the two escapes (interestingly, she doesn't mention her brother's role in warning him, suggesting that maybe he *didn't* tell her this story after all, and thus maybe not Catt).
Btw, Wilhelmine has Peter pretending to go after a deserter; the son has him trying out his new horse. Nicolai's story of a leisurely ride matches Peter's son's more closely, so maybe that was the story Peter told, and Wilhelmine misremembered or got a slightly different variant.
Okay, so I had been wondering when Seckendorff reports Peter missing. On August 14, Seckendorf's in Wesel with FW, and he has a several-page write-up in Forster (volume 3. starting on page 1) that I don't have time to plod through, but he mentions "Katt und Keith" as accomplices, and says--and this is odd--that of the "letzteren" know one knows anything about where he might be, but the "der erste" has gone to Nijmegen and Colonel Moulin has been sent after him to try to arrest him. Now Wilhelmine, Peter's son, *and* the official Mylius report to FW during the trial (the most reliable of all sources) all say Moulin went after Peter in the Hague, thus causing him to flee to Chesterfield. And Nijmegen is just across the Dutch border from Wesel (man, I am learning so much geography in this fandom). So Seckendorff must be swapping Katt and Keith (and remember,
So I still don't know where Wilhelmine and Catt got their stories, but while they agree on Peter being warned, they don't agree on Fritz warning him; that's Nicolai and Catt.
Two words: Quintus Icilius.
I died.
Well, yes. Which is why I nominated them at [Bad username or unknown identity: unsent letters]; letters are good for venting. :)
Indeed, and I'm sorry no one is in a position to join you and request them! What can I say, we can't keep up with you. ;)
It's funny if it's contemporaries wondering how Voltaire and Fritz can cure and praise each other within two breaths, but it's heartbreaking if it's Fritz and Wilhelmine, or Fritz and Peter Keith, unable to to admit that they have these particular resentments.
I knooooow.
while he was alive he evidently tried to repress resentment sensations by falling back on the faith of his childhood
Yeah, it's so clear from the write-up that he's clinging to religion as a way of managing his emotions (fear as much as resentment) that even when I was headcanoning it as a display for FW's benefit, I was assuming he was getting *some* emotional comfort from it. Even if just the hymn-singing and something to focus on that wasn't imminent death.
But if FW hadn't intervened and he had spent those ten years in prison, well....
Yeeahh. Especially if he then ends up with a guilt-ridden and Kool-aid-drinking Fritz who is not at all what he expected, and is also more traumatized than an equally traumatized Katte is equipped to deal with.
FIX-IT FOR EVERYONE.
Re: Sauvez-Vous!
Having gone through Seckendorf's report, I'm thinking you're right. Also, the fact that Peter took the time to have lunch or dinner with Keppel (the former Dutch resident in Berlin, who, however, seems to have been a Prussian citizen*, since Seckendorff mentions later FW is pissed off with "General Keppel for aiding Keith") would indicate he's at this point not yet aware that FW is after him and he has to fear for his life.
*Like Stratemann was actually a Prussian citizen but appointed envoy by the Duke of Braunschweig nonetheless.
I'm curious what you make of other details Hertefeld-via-Nicolai gives for the escape plan, but I'll fait for your comment on this before I ask.
Re: Sauvez-Vous!