cahn | Frederick the Great discussion post 9

Entry tags:

frederick the great

Frederick the Great discussion post 9

...I leave you guys alone for one weekend and it's time for a new Fritz post, lol!

I'm gonna reply to the previous post comments but I guess new letter-reading, etc. should go in this one :)

Frederick the Great links

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

1. Mildred, can I link your Fritzian library at the link post? Wanted to ask before I did that. I guess one needs permission but I could put in a note to ask you about that :)

2. I've been wondering: should we make a DW community? I should say that I definitely do not mind At All hosting it on this DW! (I feel like one of those French salon people :D ) I was just thinking it might make it slightly easier for e.g. other people to find our discussions? (Although I suppose

iberiandoctor got sucked in because it's here and not in a community, so there's that :D )

Well, don't leave us alone for a weekend! We missed you! (Your v. secret diary contribution was amaaaaazing, though.)

Seconding this! You are our Madame Recamier, or if we want to stay in Berlin, Rahel von Varnhagen. <3

I'm cool with either a DW community (do we call it Rheinsberg or Cirey?) or you continuing to host; you are the gracious hostess who has to decide, I think. :)

1. Hmm. I've been thinking about that. If the contents were entirely public domain, I wouldn't mind. But a couple files are not, and I'm iffy. I suppose I could move those into a different folder shared with just you two, and make the rest publicly available (and read-only). It could be like the Hogwarts library, with a restricted section.

(Btw, your links post is missing posts 6-9. I suppose you could just link to the tag now that there is one?)

2. Re the community, I'm leaning toward keeping things here for several reasons:
a) Keeping everything in one place, since we can't import our existing 9 posts.
b) I don't feel like DW communities are so active that a niche topic like this is going to get much more activity than it would get just from the three of us telling our respective followers about it? I could be wrong.
c) We have a really good alchemy and momentum going here that I'm reluctant to mess with, unless there's something specific about this environment that other people are finding a problem. It's really working for me.

But if the team votes for a migration, I will follow you along and may even end up grateful, who knows. :) (I am currently grateful my wife at the last minute talked me out of the place we almost moved to this year and into a different place.)

(I feel like one of those French salon people :D )

I feel like I called you our salon hostess at one point! Or if I didn't, I certainly thought about it. And

selenak is obviously our reader, and we have a royal patron. That just leaves me. The librarian? Making information available is turning out to be my superpower. :D

I vote for Rheinsberg, because Émilie deserves her own community just like she deserves her own show, and not to have her space annexed by Fritz because she woke up too late one day. ;) If we do end up moving toward a proper Enlightenment thinkers discussion, maybe even an organized Yuletide effort like we did this year, we could call it Cirey.

Sounds reasonable to me!

Yuletide effort like we did this year

This past year, haha. Guess

iberiandoctor isn't the only one who didn't get the memo about the new year!

Replying to Mildred’s awesome “who’s topping” dissection of our antihero’s love and sex life here.

So: can’t find anything to disagree with re: your reading of the five people in question (and yes, definitely praise kink with Voltaire); the Algarotti/Orzelska parallel in what each experience made Fritz realise works for me, too.

A couple of addendums, though:

1. What, if anything, is going on with the batmen and pages? I know you’ve said in the past that it’s basically just Fritz liking to look and some flirting, and Voltaire certainly insinuates that for all the “harem” taunts there wasn’t much sexual action beyond maybe some petting. But then Voltaire is trash talking at that point and out to hurt. The thing is, though: never mind the power differential with everyone else, it’s really starkest here. And at least according to court gossip as rendered by Lehndorff, who is somewhat more reliable than Voltaire in repeating Fritz related gossip without putting a personal agenda slant on it, the court seems to be under the impression that Marwitz and Glasow were both people Fritz favoured with more than the occasional pinch in the cheek and a reasonable salary. Glasow was at least trusted enough to be made valet post Fredersdorf (though of course without all of Fredersdorf’s other responsibilities) and to come with Fritz on the Netherlands trip. Marwitz was part of a sibling power game with Heinrich, yes, but since he was yo-yoing in and out of favour for a while thereafter, there must have been a bit more attraction? And then of course there’s Trenck, the charismatic nutter. Who did get promoted rather quickly, and punished so much over the top-way that really the only reason why I don’t think Fritz did anything undeniable with him was that Trenck would have been constitionably unable to shut up about it later.

2. I therefore offer the possibility that low sex drive or not, he might have had some fantasies, not related to emotional intimacy - which I don’t think he sought with any of the above, though for as long as it lasted he had some trust in them - which involved having these good looking specimens at his disposal and under his control. Maybe he just orderd them to give him massages, but I do think there may have been something more than looking going on. (Though in deniable, not explicitly sexual ways, because otherwise, see above.)

3. Not completeley unrelated: Heinrich seems to have had a strong sex drive. And that must have felt like the road not taken, occasionally. Now considering FW’s opinion on royals who spend money on “whores” and Fritz’ lording it over Louis XV, I bet Heinrich’s tendency to pick the male equivalent of expensive mistresses, go through major relationship drama and in most cases end in new debts and minus a boyfriend made Fritz feel superior, and it wasn’t like he would have changed places, but... it’s also true that Heinrich‘s guys had a similar profile to those batmen mentioned above. (And of course in at least one case overlap.) (BTW, since we‘re exchanging headcanons: contemporaries were sure that Heinrich‘s boyfriends did the topping, though that might mostly be because he was small and they were tall. Not Potsdam Giant tall, but unsurprisingly all taller than tiny Heinrich. My own assumption is that most of them did top physically and he was into that, but also that he topped emotionally in the majority of cases, not least because while he put up with a great deal from his favourites, he was usually the one who did the dumping. Also because if you‘re involved in an ongoing push-pull emotional power struggle with your brother anyway, you‘re more likely to want to be emotionally in control in your love/sex life.) ETA: isn‘t that called a „pushy bottom“ inn fandom? Sounds like Heinrich to me.

Edited 2020-01-13 21:39 (UTC)

Okay, so this happened, and then I produced some crackfic, and then I thought it should go here.

selenak's comment:
What is she fighting for? She wants boring men to leave her alone and let her read books. <3

Best reason to duel ever. And yes, if not for his misogyny and his regarding her as his romantic rival, Fritz could have totally sympathized. Mind you, do we really want to encourage him to fight duels? Émilie might have been content with just disarming her opponent, but Fritz? I fear it would end in him first writing a pamphlet about why duels are old fashioned and stupid, and then proceeding to slicing up the first person who makes the mistake of accepting a challenge.

Trufax: Lehndorff, with the usual WTF? of disbelief while watching as a groundling, notes in the middle of the Voltaire vs Maupertuis (vs Fritz) disaster, that Maupertuis challenged Voltaire to a duel. Not one of wits, a real fencing duel.

My reply:

I fear it would end in him first writing a pamphlet about why duels are old fashioned and stupid, and then proceeding to slicing up the first person who makes the mistake of accepting a challenge.

AHAHAHAHAAAAA *dies*

Are you kidding me? This, I *have* to see! :P

Trufax: Lehndorff, with the usual WTF? of disbelief while watching as a groundling, notes in the middle of the Voltaire vs Maupertuis (vs Fritz) disaster, that Maupertuis challenged Voltaire to a duel. Not one of wits, a real fencing duel.

Yup. And per my secondary sources, Maupertuis was extremely sick and coughing up blood at the time, but he felt he had to defend his honor even though he was in no shape to do so.

...Still not sure he wouldn't have won. Voltaire was no great shakes himself, in terms of physical conditioning or health.

Fritz would attack before the other person was ready, win, then write pamphlets defending himself. When he was invited to be someone's second, he would make an agreement with the opposite side and leave the principal stranded.

Eventually, people would realize that it needed to be three-on-one to counter his double-dealing. After starting the attack on a noncombatant second when nobody was ready, Fritz would spend most of his time trying to keep his opponents from joining forces. Eventually, after everyone was staggering around with blood streaming into their eyes, hardly able to see what was going on, one of his opponents would succumb to her gaping wound. Her second would step in, but so impressed by the fact that Fritz (with Heinrich as his reluctant second, natürlich) was still going, he would start attacking his former allies, shifting the terms of combat to two on two.

At the end of the day, everyone would be carried off the field on stretchers. Fritz would declare victory on the grounds that he was still alive. Nobody would be in a condition to argue. One of his opponents' seconds would come to visit him in the hospital bringing flowers and a get-well-soon card, but would make the mistake of challenging him to a duel later in life.

Fritz and Heinrich would stop quarreling long enough to heave a mutual great sigh and look at each other. "Fine." "Fine."

In unison: "Bring it on, kid."

cahn or

iberiandoctor or anyone else who may be lurking, let me know if you need any of the historical parallels made explicit.

Edited 2020-01-13 22:28 (UTC)

1. I think that is a great solution.

(Yeah, I think it makes more sense to just link to the tag at this point!)

2. It looks like there is not a great impetus for a migration, but I wanted to bring it up in case people were interested in that. I agree not being able to import the posts is kind of a bummer, and it's true that it might disturb this magic alchemy that we have here ~~without mercury I might add~~

I think you did call me the salon hostess! I'm just feeling it even more since I have been reading the Emilie bio (which I've finally finished but it will take me a while to write it up -- you and

selenak do this so quickly, I am in awe)

1. Will put organizing it on my list then, and let you know when it's done! Hopefully today, although comments are moving fast, lol.

2. magic alchemy that we have here ~~without mercury I might add~~

Laughed so much, you have no idea. Poor Fredersdorf!

Totally looking forward to the write-up whenever you have time! It's

selenak you should be in awe of; I have no job at this time and virtually no other hobbies. Also virtually no family in terms of demands on my time. I have two things: health problems, and Fritz fandom. And if it weren't for our magical alchemy, I would be in a much unhappier place.

~~We have the healthy, mercury-free kind of alchemy!~~

1. Voltaire certainly insinuates that for all the “harem” taunts there wasn’t much sexual action beyond maybe some petting. But then Voltaire is trash talking at that point and out to hurt.

Really, though? Because I thought he implied that Fritz was bottoming for his pages, that's what the "secondary role" was all about. At least other historians have taken it that way, have pointed out that he was trash-talking and out to hurt, and have pointed out the hemorrhoids. I mean, insinuating that the king is a bottom, and a bottom for his social inferiors, is WAY more slanderous than insinuating that he pets some pretty boys.

the court seems to be under the impression that Marwitz and Glasow were both people Fritz favoured with more than the occasional pinch in the cheek and a reasonable salary

Wow, a reasonable salary! :P His batman/page/I forget Claus gets included in the list too, especially based on some of the letters to Fredersdorf (if I'm recalling correctly).

I agree gossip had Fritz sexually active, but I think they were overestimating his sex drive. Not least because, as you point out, if Trenck didn't talk, nothing happened for him to talk about, and if it didn't happen with him, it probably didn't happen with the others either. But Fritz reacted similarly to the betrayals or alleged defections of both, and his fantasies may have played a role in the intensity of his reactions.

2. I agree 100% about the fantasies. I didn't mean to exclude that when I said "just likes to look," like the looking was aesthetic or something. I meant in terms of action, there's probably not much more than looking happening.

Inside Fritz's head? The thing about having a low sex drive is that it's not mutually exclusive with having an active sexual fantasy life. And power trips, especially when you have control issues but even when you don't, can feed heavily into sexual fantasies. I absolutely believe Fritz was getting off, figuratively and/or literally, on the idea of having charismatic pretty boys at his disposal.

3. contemporaries were sure that Heinrich‘s boyfriends did the topping

Wait, what? Which contemporaries? Lehndorff (or his sources)? Gossipy sensationalists demand quotes!

My own assumption is that most of them did top physically and he was into that, but also that he topped emotionally in the majority of cases

Makes perfect sense to me and fits pretty well with what I was imagining.

Edited 2020-01-13 23:21 (UTC)

ETA: isn‘t that called a „pushy bottom“ inn fandom? Sounds like Heinrich to me.

That, or topping from the bottom. Agree that's Heinrich! There's also the bratty bottom, who sasses at you until you make him shut up, because he wants you to work for your dominance. Not sure that fits Heinrich as well (it's independent of emotional topping/bottoming, though--purely a sexual dynamic), but it's a possibility.

Could totally see Marwitz as a bratty bottom, though. Hmm, Heinrich might like that when he was topping. It might be very satisfying to have to work to dominate someone who was mouthing off, and then to succeed at it. Not to say he's working out any fraternal issues here... ;)

the five people in question

Six people! (Keith, Katte, Suhm, Fredersdorf, Algarotti, Voltaire.) I considered Suhm and Fredersdorf as complements, so there were only five sections.

Also, just to be perfectly clear: I agree with what you said in another post that Voltaire was het, and he and Fritz never irl made it to handjobs. But if they DID ever have sex, we agree it would be handjobs and petting and praise kink all the way. And some banter, of course, especially during the foreplay. I'm sure the banter gets them both turned on like whoa.

I also just want to add that this discussion is the ultimate in gossipy sensationalists with scholarly instincts! We've gathered a great deal of data so that we can have well-informed, evidence-based opinions about who put what body part into whom and what they were thinking while they did (or didn't). :D :D

This may not be my favorite fandom ever in terms of canon material (I think Tolkien and Homer have to duke it out for that), but it has BY FAR been my best fandom experience in terms of interactions with fellow fans. <3

Okay, if I haven't made any mistakes:

1) You should both have access to the Fritzian Library - Restricted Section.
2) The link https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1sWCLDZ2X8-jWKK3bYMtfNgbrUGMuYwlp?usp=sharing should work for anyone to view the main library, without having to ask permission.
3) You two (but no one else) should have edit access to the library, in case you want to upload new items or fix any weirdnesses that may be bugging you in the machine-translated correspondence. The one thing I've fixed so far is having Fritz and Suhm walk under the beech trees and elms instead of the beech trees and abalones, lol.

I don't know if you have access to delete, but it goes without saying, I trust you not to. I've created backup copies in a separate, private folder, because accidents happen. (Because Google Drive doesn't make it easy to copy a folder, you may have gotten per-item notifications; sorry for the spam if so.)

My criteria for the Restricted Section are recently published, largely original, monograph-length works. Journal articles, largely unoriginal works (e.g. translations of 18th century documents), or long-ago published works are freely available.

If you run into any permissions problems, let me know. Otherwise, enjoy!

Btw, I did work in a library once, long ago. :) Happy to be royal librarian in our fandom!

I mean, insinuating that the king is a bottom, and a bottom for his social inferiors, is WAY more slanderous than insinuating that he pets some pretty boys.

True and true in the best classical tradition. I mean, if you wanted to slander a political opponent in Rome you didn‘t just insinuate he was getting it on with men, that wasn‘t negative per se, but that he was getting topped by social inferiors. (Or non-Romans.) (Or both and by women - hardcore mode of trash talk!)

(See also Cicero about Mark Antony. Now there‘s a Roman Fritz would not have cared to be compared to.)

I absolutely believe Fritz was getting off, figuratively and/or literally, on the idea of having charismatic pretty boys at his disposal

We have another concensus. :)

Which contemporaries? Lehndorff (or his sources)? Gossipy sensationalists demand quotes!

I was extrapolating from comments like that of the Marquis de Bombelles, who writes when Heinrich is visiting Paris for the first time: This Prince whom one had assumed to be just the willing toy of his favourites now appears in France as an imposing, brilliant personality. His repliques show his intelligence, dignity and common sense while he also asks witty and persistent questions.

„Willing toy“ doesn‘t have to be a sexual position assumption, of course, but it could be, given the climate of the day.

(BTW, another Frenchman, Count Ségur, on the same occasion - Heinrich‘s first visit to France - sums up what I meant in an earlier reply to Iberiandoctor about first impressions based on looks vs personality: His enchanting conversation and his amiable nature soon won him everyone‘s love. When one talked with him one soon forgot his unimpressive height, and the disagreeableness of his face which at first even looked repellent. His mind ennobled his body, and soon one only noticed the great man and the most charming of humans.)

As for Lehndorff, what do you take him for? He would never get into this much detail about the most adorable of princes. Seriously now, when he‘s angry or eye-rolling about Heinrich and boyfriend du jour, the most he says is that „X had a pretty face, so of course the prince fell for him“ or makes the terse comment that everyone had to hear what a genius, say, Mara was when Heinrich was aflame, but he doesn‘t make physical insinuations. Re: his own physical interactions with Heinrich,i.e. the benefits part of friends with benefits, it doesn‘t get more detailed than „embraced me tenderly“ or the „Polterabend/Stag Night“ entry about Heinrich coming home with him to his old flat where they celebrated stag night and then went on to his new flat, and since the two of the are the only ones doing the celebrating and we get in the same entry a sentence like „ My heart feels the whole height of this pleasure as I haven't been able to enjoy it for such a long time“, at a point where he’s seeing Heinrich practically daily in terms of social interactions, well, this reader assumes they did a bit more than tenderly embrace. Another occasion where I‘m pretty sure something happened is in the 7 years war when he hasn‘t seen Heinrich for two years due to the war and mentions not leaving him until he‘s fallen asleep. Maybe they did just talk each other‘s ears off, of course, but despite having his then boyfriend Kalkreuth as trusted lieutenant with him and Lehndorff being a married man by then, I suspect Lehndorff the civilian and reminder of a life beyond the battlefield, no to mention Lehndorff the fellow mourner for AW and provider of constant affection since about a decade would have been someone Heinrich reached out physically on that occasion. As for Lehndorff, it‘s Heinrich. And a Heinrich now endowed with a new heroic reputation, - Lehndorff at one point goes a bit hipster - I loved him already when the lot of you were gossipping about his various boyfriends - when the court starts to talk about Heinrich‘s battle heroics ca. 1757/1758. Sorry, Mrs. Lehndorff, but not only do I doubt he‘d have said no, but I also think he might have been eager to assert a claim there.

Mind you, as opposed to the rough trade boyfriends I don‘t think Heinrich usually went for penetrative sex with Lehndorff, and that that whatever sexual elements their relationship had were mostly kissing, blow jobs plus petting. But on those two specific occasions? Mutual topping, i.e. switching, is my head canon.

Edited 2020-01-14 02:44 (UTC)

I mean, if you wanted to slander a political opponent in Rome you didn‘t just insinuate he was getting it on with men, that wasn‘t negative per se, but that he was getting topped by social inferiors.

I just want to share this quote from Roman Homosexuality for

cahn: "Finally, the crucial importance of appearances illustrates the complexities of the relationship between representation and reality. If a certain man actually played the receptive role in the majority of his sexual encounters, yet managed to keep that fact a secret known only to himself and his partners and otherwise maintained the appearance of a fully masculine man, then he was a fully masculine man in the all-important arena of public discourse, despite the fact that he actually was breaking the rules behind closed doors. By contrast, if there were persistent rumors to the effect that a man liked to play the receptive role in intercourse, even if the man himself had never actually been penetrated, he was ipso facto a marked man, metaphorically 'fucked' even if not literally so."

„Willing toy“ doesn‘t have to be a sexual position assumption, of course, but it could be, given the climate of the day.

Yep, makes sense to me. The alternative would probably be "source of ready money."

As for Lehndorff, what do you take him for?

Well, not someone who would share this much detail! That's why I was so surprised. I'm glad it was a different source, it makes much more sense.

Also, thanks for spelling out the details of your evidence for the FWB relationship. Yay data. Yay gossipy sensationalism.

En garde! Yes, that‘s totally how it would go if Fritz took up dueling.

Re: Maupertuis vs Voltaire, Lehndorff‘s precise entry on April 15th is: Maupertuis‘ folly reaches new heights as he challenges Voltaire to a duel. The later answers through a lovely letter which makes one burst with laughter; it is even more biting than his „Akakia“.

(It should be added that generally, Lehndorff likes Maupertuis better, and certainly thought he was more in the right when the whole disaster gets rolling, but at this point has passed the WTF stage and reached the pop corn munching stage.)

at this point has passed the WTF stage and reached the pop corn munching stage

Sounds about right. Along with most of Europe!

Could totally see Marwitz as a bratty bottom, though. Hmm, Heinrich might like that when he was topping. It might be very satisfying to have to work to dominate someone who was mouthing off, and then to succeed at it. Not to say he's working out any fraternal issues here... ;)

Oh, I'm pretty sure working out fraternal issues is what Fritz is doing post big clash 1746 after Marwitz gets fired/rehired as a guard, considering Lehndorff reports ten years later that in the intervening years, sometimes Fritz was favouring Marwitz and sometimes treating him like a criminal. Also my headcanon is that in 1756 when he resurfaces in Heinrich's social circle again - which Lehndorff reports as something new, and thankfully, data wise, adds he himself hasn't seen Marwitz since 1749 - Heinrich and Marwitz have sex one more time and also an honest wrap-up conversation about what the hell happened in 1746. (Pre war 1756 is a mild time for fraternal relations; Heinrich has arranged himself with his marriage, AW is alive and happy (and happily flirting with Mina), and Fritz doesn't demand any new submissions since he's busy concluding treaties with England and hasn't invaded Saxony yet.) Marwitz says something along the lines of "for what it's worth, I never did actually do it with your brother, he's not into that, it's all talk and intense stares with him while he makes you sweat in other ways". That sets Heinrich's mind at rest. It also kills any remaining sexual interest in Marwitz on his part, because Hohenzollerns are fucked up like that. (Also, of course, the outbreak of the war means everyone gets their priorities rearranged anyway. If "beautiful" Marwitz isn't identitical with Marwitz the dead Quartermaster from the Rheinsberg obelisk who died in 1759, that means he passes out of both brothers' lives for good then and maybe post war meets up with cousin female Marwitz the salon hostess and former lady-in-waiting to Wilhelmine in Vienna.

As to Heinrich working out fraternal issues with Marwitz as mouthy bottom pre and during big clash with Fritz of February and March 1746: am currently tempted to go with this scenario: 19 years old Heinrich, like Fritz, is freshly returned from the Second Silesian War and on a victory high. (Also on a survival high, I mean, he'd made it through his first few actual battles and done well, not yet on a general level, that's a decade in the future, but he's proved that he can't just personally survive but can be given some men and successfully lead them, too. Big Bro isn't the only one with military talent. Yay!) Up to this point, relations with Fritz aren't actually dysfunctional. I mean, Fritz has bossed him around re: not being a slacker and applying himself to reading, but that worked out, like young Fritz before him, Heinrich discovered he loves reading and doesn't mind hard work at all, he thrives on it. All the same, 19th years old Heinrich is in a heady mood, plus Fritz - who is busy firing off angry letters at Wihelmine and also had Trenck imprisoned for the first time - is probably in a bad mood and snappish. So when during one of those times he's in Potsdam with Fritz he spots Marwitz the hot page he falls for him, it's 80% young love/lust, but it' also 20 % because that's one page Big Bro shows an interest in and 19 years old Heinrich fresh from Silesia is in a "yes I can" mood. And wants to demonstrate that he may not be King, but he's got no problem pulling, even someone who's supposed to only care about the King's favour.

To make it crystal clear, I don't think he fell for Marwitz because of that, that he just went and looked for a page his brother was showing favour to, just that 19 years old Heinrich went "wow, that guy is hot! I'm in love!" and then "so what if Big Bro also fancies him? Look out, Fritz, I'm a grown up now! I'm feeling pretty invincible right now! En garde!"

We've been wondering whether Heinrich or Fritz showed interest in Marwitz first, but if my order of events is right, it would additionally account for Fritz going from being pretty well disposed towards younger brother in 1745 to extraordinarily bitchy in those letters in February/March 1746. And of course Heinrich's timing couldn't have been worse, since Fritz has just had the experience of favoured batman Trenck not just possibly spying for the Austrians but carrying on with sister Amalie behind Fritz' back. So events spiral out of control and Heinrich ends up with the first incident in the list of "how I hate you, let me count the ways" in his life.

I'm sure the banter gets them both turned on like whoa.

Definitely. Doesn't Voltaire even in the anti Fritz satiric pamphlet/memoirs state Fritz was witty? My current headcanon for Voltaire's feelings re: Fritz is that at first when Crown Prince Fritz writes, it's a mixture of calculation (this is a future King we're talking about, and a state pension is always really useful to have, especially if in your own country you could land in prison very easily), idealism (this is a future King we're talking about, and Voltaire now imagines he could change the world, or a part of it, for the better in ways other than through writings; cue him reading up Plato again), head turned by flattery (fan letters by now are nothing new, but coming from royalty they are) and some human interest (hang on, I've heard those stories about his ghastly father, I know all about ghastly fathers, and here's this young man writing in quite impressive French, having evidently succeeded in making something of himself despite the ogre on the throne - I see something of myself here!). The interest intensifies through the correspondance, but he's not actually in love in the Crown Prince years, flirtatious phrases like "I dream of my prince like I would of a mistress" when he hears FW is on his death bed not withstanding. No, he falls for King Fritz when he meets him, actually not so much because of the change in station but because King Fritz suddenly displays way more snark than Crown Prince Fritz did, turns out to be wily on a level Voltaire clearly hadn't anticipated and thus is a constant challenge of wits, and also, there's suddenly competition by none other than Émilie's recurring rebound Maupertuis. And that's when the French Homer truly falls in love.

Edited 2020-01-14 07:45 (UTC)

Yep, makes sense to me. The alternative would probably be "source of ready money."

Well, that, too. Btw, I find it pretty telling that while to this day you have indignant comment writers no-homo-ing Fritz and even about Heinrich going "there is no proof!", their contemporaries seem to have had zero doubts in that department.

But back to insinuations re: favourites - these do often come with assumptions of position.

I mean, take Louis XIV versus Louis XV. Le Roi Soleil had his share of mistresses, both short and long term, and made a great deal of enemies in his life, so there was no lack of caricature printed in, say, the Netherlands, which he was often at war with, or in some of the German states. But what's notably missing are caricatures that present him as being topped by his various ladies. The assumption being that however much influence the mistresses had, the sun king was the dominating manly man here, and thus of course on top. (His last maitresse en titre and morganatic wife Madame de Maintenon gets credited with emotionally topping him, but not in a way that lends itself to sexual assumptions, since the idea is that she, with the zeal of a convert - since she was a former Huguenot - is the one who makes Louis go ultra pious, ultra Catholic and drive out the Huguenots from France.)

Meanwhile, there is no lack of caricature of Louis XV being depicted as being physically topped by his mistresses as well as being led by his prick in general. Because unlike Grandpa, Louis XV isn't seen as manly and strong, he's seen as soft and easily swayed, which translates itself into being topped by women physically for the satirists.

Also, thanks for spelling out the details of your evidence for the FWB relationship. Yay data. Yay gossipy sensationalism.

Data is characterisation, as you've said. I also find it highly interesting that Lehndorff and Heinrich knew each other for years before Lehndorff falls in love. Until the winter of 1751, Heinrich is mentioned as part of the divine trio Lehndorff hangs out with, but not differently than Ferdinand, and the sole one of the three princes occasionally singled out for praise is AW. In fact, when lamenting AW in the summer of 1758 and looking back on his relationship with him, he notes that in 1750 Heinrich was in love with a guy named Wormser and had asked Lehndorff to let Wormser take his place in the carousel (= big Berlin carnival event), Lehndorff refused, Heinrich was irritated and somewhat cool towards Lehndorff for a while but AW backed Lehndorff up as being in the right not to surrender his place at the big social event of the season. This, like I said, jives with the early diary entries not singling out Heinrich among the brothers in any way until late 1751, when "Prince Heinrich" starts to get mentioned as "dear Prince Heinrich", Lehndorff starts to have dinners and meetings with him without one or both of the other two, and then in 1752 we start to get all those mad crush eloges ("what a man to be worshipped", "what little self possession I have leaves me when I am near him" etc.). So it's not a case of Lehndorff falling in love with a prince he doesn't yet know very well and is dazzled by, but Lehndorff falling in love with a prince he actually does know, has known and socialized with for years until something starts to change.

What major new thing is going on with Heinrich in the winter of 1751/ all through 1752? Fritz demands his submission in the form of marriage, that's what. Heinrich isn't actually boyfriend-less during that period, the boyfriend du jour back then is Reisewitz - who as Lehndorff notes is busy spending Heinrich's money supposed to go for the stables on himself - but for some reason, that's when he intensifies his relationship with Lehndorff from group friendship to intense personal relationship. (Which it will remain through the next decades.) And from Heinrich's pov, too, it's interesting he doesn't seek out someone new to compliment his already tumultous emotional life, he goes for someone he knows. (And knows to be a courtier, but not without a backbone instead of doing whatever a prince requests, as per the Wormer/carousel interlude.)

The salon's consulting attorney here, reporting for duty.

LMK if there are legal queries and I will either provide my views (which shall not amount to legal advice in anyone's jurisdiction) or the quality-controlled views of others, or vaguely gesture in the direction of applicable textbooks!

Is there evidence that FS was active in the community after that? I know not everyone obeyed the pope, but it would be an interesting bit of characterization if he didn't.

I don't remember from the two MT biographies whether there was something. According to the German language free mason Websites, after his initiation:

During his stay in England, he attended a lodge in Houghton Hall with Grand Master Lord Lovell (between 4 and 11 November), and on Friday, 4 December 1731, he visited the Masonic Lodge in the Devil's Tavern (Devils Tavern near Temple Bar) and received the Master's degree from the Norwich "Maid's Head Lodge" in the country house of the great statesman Walpole in Norfolk. He left England on 9 December.

These are the reliably ascertainable data on the Masonic activity of the Lothringer. The fact that the Hamburg brothers greeted him on the occasion of his imperial coronation with a poem by their brother Alardus is proof that he was honoured as a brother in the circle of brothers. Likewise, that for a long time the English Grand Lodge still issued the health of the brother Lorraine as an official drinking motto. A lodge was also named after him.

What else is reported about his mooring activity is undocumented. He is said to have stopped the Masonic persecutions triggered by the papal cops in Tuscany. He is not mentioned in the files of the Vienna Loge Aux Trois Canons. It probably belongs to the field of invention that he held lodge in the Vienna Hofburg and that Maria Theresa, out of jealousy and female curiosity, had the lodge "Aux trois canons" blown up.

It was repeatedly claimed and also portrayed in a romantic and dramatic way (Sacher-Masoch and others) that Maria Theresa, dressed as a man, had been involved in the lifting of the lodge. The fact that the high dignitaries and officers arrested in this act of violence got away with very light punishment gets attributed to his influence. Maria Theresa knew that her husband was Mason. This has not prevented her from issuing sharp lestes against Freemasonry after the papal decree. Francis of Lorraine is also said to have softened the punishment of Prague's aristocratic and high traitors. Here, too, doubts are justified, because Maria Theresa has also shown leniency in the rebellious Upper Austria with political wisdom without anyone tributing this to either the masons or her husband.

and about the Free Mason in Austria in general.

In 742, the first lodge on Austrian soil, "Aux Trois Canons", began its work in Vienna. The language of the upscale stalls, especially if one had something exclusive and discreet to share, was French: the Trois Canons are not three cannons, but the three rules of conduct that are strongly recommended to every seeker when recording: " Recognize yourself!" - "Master yourself!" - "Refine yourself!"

"Aux Trois Canons" was established in Vienna in 1742 from Wroclaw and after six months already had 49 members. As we can see on the much later painting "Mozart in the Lodge", clergy (here prelate and monk) were quite present at the works - the papal damnation was obviously intended above all to prevent one's own staff from being free-thinking and in-house. religiously tolerant.

Until the end of the century, this threat had had little effect. A number of lodges were built in the cities, but also on many castles such as Rosenau. They did not all belong to the one association that was recognized as "regular" by the Grand Lodge of England. There were established here as in the whole of Europe, different high-degree systems. These are communities that, building on the three Masonic degrees of apprentice, journeyman and master, continued to celebrate the most diverse "deepenings" and "increases" (by title).
In 1776, when the Illuminati wanted to develop the very core of Freemasonry into an order of virtue and reason, with the noble intention of impermeing the whole social and political life ideologically in such a way that no further exercise of power was necessary, the effect was felt. This spirit also extends to Viennese Freemasonry. In that time of the High Enlightenment, the Lodge Zur True Concord under its master of the chair Ignaz of Born formed an intellectual spearhead. Following the example of the Royal Society (which has shaped many London lodges), the weekly 'works' dealt with all sorts of concerns of science, history (including Egyptian mysteries), the state and morality. The intellectual charisma of these lodge meetings was so strong that the Emperor Joseph II, who was inclined to the Enlightenment in itself, but nevertheless absolutist, was prompted to issue a 'patent' in 1785. Freemasonry is not prohibited here, but its independence is so limited that after the merging of the various lodges in Vienna into only two, and the prohibition of all 'angle' and castle lodges as well as all international connections, of the initially about 1000 Freemasons only about 300 remained. Mozart, by the way, remained loyal to the Confederation until his death in 1791. In 1793, the lodges themselves decided to disband.

I mean, we've seen Fritz without power and Fritz with power, we've seen Heinrich without power...we haven't seen Heinrich with power, but I'm with Tolkien that handing anyone the Ring of Power and telling them to use it isn't a good idea. "Other self" and all that. Moderately less abusive childhood works in his favor, but that's about it.

Quite. Also, we do have canonical proof of Heinrich doing the same kicking down thing Fritz does in pretty much the same way in one particular regard, i.e. their respective treatments of their wives, i.e. the one people entirely in their social power who also symbolize to them their submission to the King's will in a way they perceive as violation of their personal ives. As Fritz lives with EC for a few years in Rheinsberg in what looks like a good arrangement from the outside - he doesn't ever pretend to be in love with her, but he gives the impression of getting along with her and appreciating her efforts on his behalf towards FW - so Heinrich during the 1750s gives the impression of getting along with his unwanted wife reasonably well - he even shops for her on occasion, they do social events together and otherwise keep out each other's way, while AW and Ferdinand flirt with Mina and thus provide harmless romantic courtship Heinrich won't even pretend to offer but is okay with his brothers offering, though in AW's case this intensifies somewhat to "totally would if she wasn't my sister-in-law". (AW even tells Lehndorff as much when he's got less than a month to live, and that's when he alters his will to "Mina should raise my kids and gets my engagement ring".)

...and in both cases, we get the turnaround after a key event - Fritz ascending to the throne and having no more father to please, AW dying and the 7 Years War experience for Heinrich - to cutting the unasked for wife out of their lives in any way they can, with some thrown in petty cruelty now and then. (EC having to ask whether or not she's allowed to attend events with five courtiers Amalie and Mom go to with 45 - and even when future FW2 gets married to her niece and namesake, she doesn't know whether or not she's allowed to go to the engagement party until literally the evening before because Fritz doesn't bother answering her enquiries and Fredersdorf isn't there anymore to make him -, the infamous "Madame has grown more corpulent" to her in front of everyone after the war, Mina getting her staff exchanged and having to remind Heinrich again and again of her budget when the boyfriends get the money thrown after.)

Of course, other than Mina, Heinrich has a pretty good track record of not punching down as stress relief and trauma dealing, what with the going out of his way to help civilians in occupied territory, treat prisoners well and keep the risks to his own men as low as he can. But that's Heinrich with the ever present example of Fritz to react against, not with a ring of power in his possession and no one above him anymore. I can't make up my mind, btw, as to whether he really wanted to become king. (Well, other than in the case of (not) becoming King of America. I'm still wondering how Steuben was planning to sell that one to Congress if Heinrich had said yes. "Guys, I've just had a vision of the future, and if we don't go for constitutional monarchy, we'll end up with an orange blob as President. So, here's what I'm thinking: how about the cousin of the guy we just got rid of, who has never been here, so won't be partisan, is gay like me, so won't found a dynasty, and who's really into French so might want to change that into our offficial language?

(BTW: not sure how well Heinrich spoke English, if at all, but he read the collection of Lady Mary's letters from Turkey - doesn't say whether in the original English or in translation -, found them lifely and very informative, and reccommends them to Big Brother in one of their old age letters.)

Anyway: so he didn't want to become King of America. Would he have wanted to become King of Poland? Or of Wallachia, which was what Catherine was offering? Since we don't know whether that was her idea or his before she asked Fritz, we'll never know. And with Prussia itself, he definitely had no shortage of ideas of how it should be governed, both in Fritz' day and in FW2's day, but the impression I got was that the role he wanted was Trusted (and listened to) Advisor, not monarch on the throne. I could be wrong, of course.

Well, Homer fandom had "who topped?" debates about Achilles and Patroclos since Plato, so we have some catching up to do. :) Can't think of more lovely fellow fen to do it with!

Threaded | Top-Level Comments Only

Page 1 of 15

Frederick the Great discussion post 9

A couple of logistics questions

no subject

no subject

Re: A couple of logistics questions

no subject

no subject

no subject

Toppings of all types, continued

Dueling

Re: A couple of logistics questions

Re: A couple of logistics questions

Re: Toppings of all types, continued

Re: Toppings of all types, continued

Re: Toppings of all types, continued

Fritzian library

Re: Toppings of all types, continued

Re: Toppings of all types, continued

Re: Dueling

Re: Dueling

Re: Toppings of all types, continued

Re: Toppings of all types, continued

Constitution of the Fritz Salon

Franz Stephan and the Free Masons, continued

Rokoko Dragon Sickness or: Better stay away from rings of power as a Hohenzollern

Re: Toppings of all types, continued