cahn: (Default)
cahn ([personal profile] cahn) wrote2020-10-19 10:42 pm
Entry tags:

Frederick the Great, Discussion Post 20

Yuletide signups so far:
3 requests for Frederician RPF, 2 offers
2 requests for Circle of Voltaire RPF, 3 offers !! :D :D

(I am so curious as to who the third person is!)
selenak: (Fredersdorf)

Re: Fredersdorf: The Dirk Fahlenkamp Version (I) - Generalities

[personal profile] selenak 2020-10-24 04:01 pm (UTC)(link)
I like reading prefaces myself -- which reminds me, mildred got me to skip the Lehndorff one, but maybe if I get ahead of her I can go back and read it!

There are, in fact, two prefaces in that edition. One is the original one by Schmidt-Lötzen from 1907, and the other is actually an article a female historian wrote about tracking down the surviving Lehndorff diaries in the Leipzig archive when she was trying to verify a quote about EC, who was her main subject.

I was wondering how he got to be so very good with people as you'd have to be to deal with Fritz, but yeah, being the youngest of seven would -- well, obviously having a bunch of older siblings is not a sufficient condition (Heinrich, for instance, having a much different personality :P

Heinrich and Amalie both - of the three youngest Hohenzollern (Amalie, Heinrich, Ferdinand, in that order born), only Ferdinand seems to have had a conflict-averse nature. However, these were siblings living under very different circumstances than Fredersdorf and his siblings would have. For starters, they only had to share the bedroom with one other sibling, not five. And had servants paying attention that they would be scrubbed and well dressed (and saying their prayers, with FW as a father).


Fahlenkamp don't DO that! Maligning both Fredersdorf and our man Lehndorff >:(


I know! I kept muttering "UNFAIR!" while reading this.
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)

Re: Fredersdorf: The Dirk Fahlenkamp Version (I) - Generalities

[personal profile] mildred_of_midgard 2020-10-24 04:17 pm (UTC)(link)
There are, in fact, two prefaces in that edition. One is the original one by Schmidt-Lötzen from 1907, and the other is actually an article a female historian wrote about tracking down the surviving Lehndorff diaries in the Leipzig archive when she was trying to verify a quote about EC, who was her main subject.

I noticed the two prefaces and the introduction, which is why I skipped to the main text. I do intend to go back and read them! But I have to *work* for every line of German I read, there's 15 pages' worth, and I was just more excited about the entries themselves. So I skipped ahead.

But you and Koser have taught me the error of my ways, and I am making an effort to be better about reading introductory material these days! ;)