Entry tags:
Frederick the Great, Discussion Post 20
Yuletide signups so far:
3 requests for Frederician RPF, 2 offers
2 requests for Circle of Voltaire RPF, 3 offers !! :D :D
(I am so curious as to who the third person is!)
3 requests for Frederician RPF, 2 offers
2 requests for Circle of Voltaire RPF, 3 offers !! :D :D
(I am so curious as to who the third person is!)
Re: Alcmene and the vault
Anyway, if the bones were there in 1860 but calcified, I'm assuming they were entirely gone by 1991.
Folichon would like to point out he was the one and only Folichon in Wilhelmine's life, and she never used the name again. She also built him a tomb of his own, to wit:
But he would have been happy to share it with Biche!
Re: Alcmene and the vault
Secondly, while I don't mind someone taking one of Alcmene II's bones as a souvenir as much as I mind people doing the same to Katte's skeleton, I have to day, 19th century tourists really have no shame in that regard, do they?
What I was thinking! Though 18th century tourists had no shame when it came to looting works of art and archaeological remains: I enjoyed Wilhelmine cozying up to the Pope's people so they would look the other way while she illegally removed piece after piece from Italy. ;)
Anyway, if the bones were there in 1860 but calcified
I'm wondering what it means that they were calcified: I thought bones *were* calcified, like, by definition?
If he means they were already starting to visibly break up, then yeah, they were probably gone 130 years later.
Re: Alcmene and the vault
Re: Alcmene and the vault