Frederick the Great, Discussion Post 19

[cahn]

Yuletide nominations:

18th Century CE Federician RPF
Maria Theresia | Maria Theresa of Austria
Voltaire
Friedrich II von Preußen | Frederick the Great
Ernst Ahasverus von Lehndorff
Friedrich Heinrich Ludwig von Preußen | Henry of Prussia (1726-1802)
Wilhelmine von Preußen | Wilhelmine of Prussia (1709-1758)
Anna Amalie von Preußen | Anna Amalia of Prussia (1723-1787)
Catherine II of Russia
Hans Hermann von Katte
Peter Karl Christoph von Keith
Michael Gabriel Fredersdorf
August Wilhelm von Preußen | Augustus William of Prussia (1722-1758)

Circle of Voltaire RPF
Emilie du Chatelet
Jeanne Antoinette Poisson (Madame de Pompadour)
John Hervey (1696-1743)
Marie Louise Mignot Denis
Lady Mary Wortley-Montagu
Pierre Louis Moreau de Maupertuis
Armand de Vignerot du Plessis de Richelieu (1696-1788)
Francesco Algarotti

Comments

Re: Peter Keith

[selenak]

Hang on, if FW received the Emperor's plea for Fritz' life on November 1st, that means the story of Seckendorff holding the letter back until later can't be right?

Re: Peter Keith

[mildred_of_midgard]

So I just checked the Monarchenbriefe collection (I knew this would be worth the $30 I paid for 30 pages! :P), and the editor actually says two things (well, two things relevant to us) about the letter:

1. It was composed (verfaßt) by Seckendorff. (!!)
2. It was only handed over on October 31, when it was clear that FW would pardon Fritz.

Clear to Seckendorff, maybe.

Interestingly, this is the date the Köpenick court returned the second verdict of incompetence to try Fritz (and imprisonment for Katte).

Also, this collection includes the reply from Fritz to Charles VI, saying that he will as long as he lives do his best to demonstrate his devotion to the Emperor. But that promise dies with Charles, the editor points out.

Is this like Wilhelmine saying that her promise not to let the Marwitzes marry outside of Prussia died with FW?

Re: Peter Keith

[selenak]

Clear to Seckendorff, maybe.

Who did generally have a good reading on FW, plus of course had Grumbkow to tell him the FW mood du jour. Mind you, if this was the same day FW was absolutely incensed to learn the Katte verdict, he was hardly in a calm state of mind. So maybe Seckendorff, with or without Grumbkow's imput, also saw the connection between FW deciding not to kill his son but killing Katte as a replacement victim. (Jochen Kepler in his FW novel Der Vater lets FW pull out all the Abraham-Isaac-ram similes at this point.)

Is this like Wilhelmine saying that her promise not to let the Marwitzes marry outside of Prussia died with FW?

I guess. Though imo if Charles hadn't died, Fritz would not have been idle for long but found a different excuse to cover himself with military glory by invading. Maybe he'd have offered Charles his "protection", too

Seckendorff

[mildred_of_midgard]

Who did generally have a good reading on FW, plus of course had Grumbkow to tell him the FW mood du jour.

Right, that's what I was thinking: he might have been the first to figure this out, while everyone else is left wondering. Which is why November 1 as a date at which the pardon has been decided felt far too early to you and me. Seckendorff (and Grumbkow) were more on top of things!

Also: not that I want to give you more opportunities to make me fall even further behind in commenting than I already am, zomg :P, but while researching this question, I (re)discovered a 1792 biography + collection of contemporary documents of Seckendorff written by a descendant or other family member, which is now in the library in 4 volumes. The first two volumes seem to be a straightforward biography in German, judging by my skimming of German in an old-fashioned font, and the next two are commentaries and documentation around his political accomplishments, in a mixture of French and German.

Anyway, it's there if we want it, as reference if nothing else. I put it in the biographies folder, despite the collection of documents. Many of these bios are a mixture, thanks to scholars being nice about publishing their sources. (Debating moving Volz's Spiegel to the documents folder, since it seems to be more purely a collection of documents?)

Re: Seckendorff

[selenak]

Volz: It is a collection of documents (some of which are excerpts of memoirs, granted), and yes, thus would fit better in the documents folder.

And I salute the royal detective for finding yet another source for us! Have only read the preface and am mightly amused, because:

Preface writer: Seckendorff rocked! No other envoy in this century has accomplished as much as he!

Ghost of Seckendorff *smugly*: Told you so.

Preface writer: as a warrior-diplomat combo, he was unequalled!

All the other envoys: still got imprisoned twice, and once by his own team. We didn't, except Poniatowski.

Poniatowski: I was the victim of a love triangle involving me, Poland and Catherine, what with me loving both passionately and both turning out to demand opposing goals from me. Fall and imprisonment resulting from this is the meat of which tragedies are made. Seckendorff, otoh, got locked up twice because he had made himself enemies, and because the Margrave of Brandenburg was nothing but a gangster with good PR. You can't compare this!

Mitchell: while I can't claim to be a soldier myself, I did survive battles. It also occurs to me that given his missions to the Czarina Catherine, Prince Henry should count as a warrior-diplomat combination as well, and frankly, I would back his soldier credentials against Seckendorff's any time. He also did not have to get the Czarina drunk in order to accomplish the first division of Poland to mutual benefits.

Poniatowski: *sobs*

More seriously, going by the preface, this was the first serious Seckendorff biography, with two previous attempts being anti-Seckendorff pamphlets by enemies, and our preface writer swears he's used all the material he could find. Note that as the book was published in 1792, this can't include Wilhelmine's memoirs. (Or for that matter Lehndorff's entertaining diary entry on paying a visit to old Seckendorff in Magdeburg where he's making an acid remark about the way Fritz describes him in the "History of the House of Brandenburg". But: the biography writer would have been able to interview people who'd actually known Seckendorff in his later years, and have had access to print media long since lost, newspaper accunts, pamphlets and the like.

Re: Seckendorff

[mildred_of_midgard]

This sounds awesome, and I look forward to more tidbits!

Preface writer: Seckendorff rocked! No other envoy in this century has accomplished as much as he!

Ghost of Seckendorff *smugly*: Told you so.

Preface writer: as a warrior-diplomat combo, he was unequalled!

All the other envoys: still got imprisoned twice, and once by his own team. We didn't, except Poniatowski.

MT: You know, all that money you poured into Fritz's coffers? (And Wilhelmine's.) I could have used that when I inherited a BANKRUPT COUNTRY. Okay, Fritz was a drop in the bucket. But it's the principle of the thing! All we got in return was one freaking salmon.

But: the biography writer would have been able to interview people who'd actually known Seckendorff in his later years, and have had access to print media long since lost, newspaper accunts, pamphlets and the like.

Let us hope he made good use of them!

Re: Seckendorff

[cahn]

All we got in return was one freaking salmon.

I laughed! I mean, we know that was a really good salmon!

Re: Seckendorff

[cahn]

He also did not have to get the Czarina drunk in order to accomplish the first division of Poland to mutual benefits.

HEE. Poor Poniatowski. (Go Heinrich!)