Hey, it's not paranoia if they're really out to get you.
Sidenote: your take? Would he have, if Heinrich had made a mistake?
This is a very interesting question! I had to really think about this one.
So if you look at what Fritz normally cashiered people over, it wasn't defeats but capitulation. All the examples that Ziebura lists as parallels to AW aren't really great parallels, because all of them were in trouble for surrendering. We've also seen the Katte cousin and his replacement cashiered for surrendering Schweidnitz. I could enumerate other examples.
In contrast, Fouqué was defeated but fought to the bitter end and was captured, and Fritz, when he heard the news, said he had comported himself like a Roman. When released from captivity, Wikipedia tells me Fouqué considered himself dishonored, but Fritz disagreed, and I have external evidence that Fritz stayed on good terms with him.
Wedell was another one who lost a battle, and Fritz was definitely displeased with him, but he did not cashier him over it.
Now what do we know about Fritz and the Seven Years' War, and his terrier personality in general? You fight to the bitter end, you do not surrender. (That's why him handing over command and talking about abdicating was so interesting (I mean, he did briefly cashier himself, sort of!), and also why, if you ask me, he would never ever have done it, and why he took back command so damn fast. He was also envisioning a scenario in which Berlin was taken, Prussia was dismembered, and Fritz's goal became to preserve as much territory as possible for his heir. When that didn't happen, hey presto! it's another three years of war in which Fritz's terrier teeth latch right back onto that bone and do not let go.)
So, if Heinrich had engaged with the enemy and been defeated and captured, it would have been all "my brave brother." If Heinrich had engaged with the enemy and surrendered, it would have been "I have no brother." If Heinrich had done what AW did...
Well, what did AW do? I've been trying to fit him into the pattern of "defeats are okay but surrenders are not," and this is what I've come up with. He didn't officially hand anything over, but he failed to arrive in time to prevent Zittau from being surrendered by the force defending it, and then he didn't engage and retake it (as Fritz did with Schweidnitz later that year at Leuthen), but withdrew without fighting. And then didn't accomplish anything by withdrawing to another front. One of my sources says his army dissolved during the withdrawal.
So we have both a situation involving a surrender (which Fritz is never forgiving of), and a failure to engage.
My Fritz psychology take on this. You're supposed to prioritize his wars above all else. The following are unacceptable violations of your duty: - Not fighting in the front lines. - Surrendering. - Not engaging with the enemy and thereby losing something important to the war effort. - Being distracted from 100% commitment to the war by your grief over your dead brother. - Having lunch with MT. (No, I'm serious. I think this is the female equivalent to the above.) - Marrying off your lady-in-waiting to an Austrian.
These things are forgivable: - Losing. - Dying. - Being captured honorably.
In conclusion, I think that if Heinrich had been even slightly less skilled at his battle-avoidant approach to warfare, and he had lost something important to Fritz as a result, Fritz would have had his head (metaphorically). If this approach to warfare was Heinrich's strategy to avoid a cashiering, it was probably entirely the wrong strategy. Safer would have been just getting into a battle and losing it. If his approach to warfare was meant to win a three-front war, as opposed to the approach of constantly underestimating the enemy and engaging with superior numbers and sustaining massive casualties even when victorious *cough*, well, there's something to be said for that, Heinrich.
I really like you guys' questions! They make me think.
Also, if the items on the first list result in imprisonment *with* a trial if you're a general, and AW temporarily responding to your letters if you're the favorite sister, I can only imagine what being suspected of spying for the enemy while being his personal batman gets you. Imprisonment without a trial seems like a natural step up, and it did happen to both Trenck and Glasow. (The gravestone still seems a bit extra, though. Maybe that's where the personal involvement with Fritz and/or Amalie comes in.)
Re: Brotherly Conduct III: The Aftermath
Sidenote: your take? Would he have, if Heinrich had made a mistake?
This is a very interesting question! I had to really think about this one.
So if you look at what Fritz normally cashiered people over, it wasn't defeats but capitulation. All the examples that Ziebura lists as parallels to AW aren't really great parallels, because all of them were in trouble for surrendering. We've also seen the Katte cousin and his replacement cashiered for surrendering Schweidnitz. I could enumerate other examples.
In contrast, Fouqué was defeated but fought to the bitter end and was captured, and Fritz, when he heard the news, said he had comported himself like a Roman. When released from captivity, Wikipedia tells me Fouqué considered himself dishonored, but Fritz disagreed, and I have external evidence that Fritz stayed on good terms with him.
Wedell was another one who lost a battle, and Fritz was definitely displeased with him, but he did not cashier him over it.
Now what do we know about Fritz and the Seven Years' War, and his terrier personality in general? You fight to the bitter end, you do not surrender. (That's why him handing over command and talking about abdicating was so interesting (I mean, he did briefly cashier himself, sort of!), and also why, if you ask me, he would never ever have done it, and why he took back command so damn fast. He was also envisioning a scenario in which Berlin was taken, Prussia was dismembered, and Fritz's goal became to preserve as much territory as possible for his heir. When that didn't happen, hey presto! it's another three years of war in which Fritz's terrier teeth latch right back onto that bone and do not let go.)
So, if Heinrich had engaged with the enemy and been defeated and captured, it would have been all "my brave brother." If Heinrich had engaged with the enemy and surrendered, it would have been "I have no brother." If Heinrich had done what AW did...
Well, what did AW do? I've been trying to fit him into the pattern of "defeats are okay but surrenders are not," and this is what I've come up with. He didn't officially hand anything over, but he failed to arrive in time to prevent Zittau from being surrendered by the force defending it, and then he didn't engage and retake it (as Fritz did with Schweidnitz later that year at Leuthen), but withdrew without fighting. And then didn't accomplish anything by withdrawing to another front. One of my sources says his army dissolved during the withdrawal.
So we have both a situation involving a surrender (which Fritz is never forgiving of), and a failure to engage.
My Fritz psychology take on this. You're supposed to prioritize his wars above all else. The following are unacceptable violations of your duty:
- Not fighting in the front lines.
- Surrendering.
- Not engaging with the enemy and thereby losing something important to the war effort.
- Being distracted from 100% commitment to the war by your grief over your dead brother.
- Having lunch with MT. (No, I'm serious. I think this is the female equivalent to the above.)
- Marrying off your lady-in-waiting to an Austrian.
These things are forgivable:
- Losing.
- Dying.
- Being captured honorably.
In conclusion, I think that if Heinrich had been even slightly less skilled at his battle-avoidant approach to warfare, and he had lost something important to Fritz as a result, Fritz would have had his head (metaphorically). If this approach to warfare was Heinrich's strategy to avoid a cashiering, it was probably entirely the wrong strategy. Safer would have been just getting into a battle and losing it. If his approach to warfare was meant to win a three-front war, as opposed to the approach of constantly underestimating the enemy and engaging with superior numbers and sustaining massive casualties even when victorious *cough*, well, there's something to be said for that, Heinrich.
I really like you guys' questions! They make me think.
Also, if the items on the first list result in imprisonment *with* a trial if you're a general, and AW temporarily responding to your letters if you're the favorite sister, I can only imagine what being suspected of spying for the enemy while being his personal batman gets you. Imprisonment without a trial seems like a natural step up, and it did happen to both Trenck and Glasow. (The gravestone still seems a bit extra, though. Maybe that's where the personal involvement with Fritz and/or Amalie comes in.)