cahn: (Default)
cahn ([personal profile] cahn) wrote2019-08-06 09:31 am

Opera for Beginners (Part 3 of 3)

I talked about Opera for Beginners for my family reunion talk and used much of the advice I was given here, thank you! :)

-I brought speakers, because there isn't much use in giving an opera talk if you can't hear the music! The hilarious thing was that I was not the only one who had audio/audiovisual components to my presentation, but I was the only one who had brought speakers. I had been a little bitter about lugging them all around Montana, but less so when they turned out to be broadly useful :) What was more irritating was that after they worked fine when I tried them out in my office, they didn't work at all for a while when I was trying to give the talk. Finally my cousin's teenager, who was acting as unofficial tech support, suggested rebooting as a last resort, and of course that worked. Sigh.

-A couple of people mentioned talking about where one might go looking for opera. My biggest recommendations to a newbie are the following:
1.The Chandos Opera in English CDs, without which I would still hate opera today. I highly highly recommend all the Mozart ones, particularly the da Ponte operas (Marriage of Figaro, Don Giovanni, Cosi fan tutte), and the bel canto comedies (e.g., Barber of Seville, The Elixir of Love), and dis-recommend their Verdi except Don Carlos (for some reason Verdi tends to come out a bit muddled). Their French opera also seems to be very good, and I absolutely adore their Eugene Onegin (which stars Thomas Hampson and Kiri te Kanawa).

2. Met On Demand, which comes with a free 7-day trial. People who know a lot about opera rag on the Met for not being adventurous in its staging and concept, which, fair, but for a beginner, in my opinion, that's exactly what you want, and you can't do better than the Met for gorgeous staging and costumes, great singers, and great videography, which I didn't even know would affect me until I started watching a bunch of these... and... it does actually make a huge difference when watching video. (Watching live is, of course, different.)

-I showed several clips, one of which was a 3-minute clip of Kaufmann/Hampson/Salminen in the auto-da-fe scene from Don Carlo. (Alagna/Keenlyside/Furlanetto is still the whole version of Don Carlo I would recommend, but for auto-da-fe out of context I thought the former was better, not least because it didn't have a giant weeping Jesus in the background.) I explained beforehand the background about how Posa is Prince Carlo's best friend but also has the relationship where he has sworn fealty to King Philip. (I have uploaded the clip here (google drive video clip, ~3 minutes) -- [profile] mildredofmidgard, I know music/opera is Not Your Thing but this is the moment in Don Carlo I was talking about, check it out) and my big triumph, as far as I am concerned, is that when the clip ended my cousin cried out, "Oh, that's so sad!" MY WORK HERE IS DONE.

-My other great triumph was that E was curious about what I said about Don Giovanni. Being her, she could not care less about Don G himself -- she was perfectly content with a limited understanding that he was the Bad Guy -- but she was particularly interested in what I said about Don G coming to a sticky end, and asked about it the next day. Once I further explained that there was a singing statue and that in many productions Don G disappeared into flames with the statue at the end, both she and A really wanted to watch it, so that afternoon we all snuggled up on the couch and watched "Don Giovanni, a cenar teco" (this one with Rodney Gilfrey) and they still ask for "the statue opera" on occasion. (That's the only part they have watched or are interested in watching, or that I am interested in playing for them, until they're a lot older. Well, okay, "O statua gentilissima," but that's along the same lines.)

-Since you guys said it was fun for people to recognize music in opera, another short clip I showed was from Thais, because, well, I don't know if it's all Koreans or just my particular family, but all our extended relatives LOOOOOVE Meditation from Thais and all of us cousins who play violin (or piano, if that cousin happened to be near one of the cousins who played violin) have had to play that song approximately six million times, every time a third cousin twice removed came to visit. There was much groaning when the melody was revealed :)

-It turns out my aunt (uncle's wife) really likes opera!!!! We are already making plans to go to Salzburg or Italy sometime and watch opera :D (well, pipe dreams right now... I certainly wouldn't go until my kids are older)

(Part 1 was where I asked for help; Part 2 was an outtake of this post about emoting in opera)
selenak: (James Boswell)

Re: Charlotte and sisters?

[personal profile] selenak 2019-09-16 07:46 am (UTC)(link)
Well, the three 18th century Royal spouses who as far as we can know never cheated on their wives were: 1) FW (no comment necessary), Louis XVI. (might not have needed sex tips from his brother-in-law otherwise, she said flippantly, but seriously now, no mistresses for Louis, which did not make Marie Antoinette a happier Woman), George III (was by far the best husband of any Hannover, though that's damming with faint praise, given how rotten the other Georges and William were, but otoh: Farmer George did go mad).

All of which is not meant to excuse Franz Stefan cheating on Maria Theresia, but to observe sexual fidelity wasn't the ultimate criterium was to which royal marriages were successful ones.

mildred_of_midgard: (Default)

Re: Charlotte and sisters?

[personal profile] mildred_of_midgard 2019-09-18 03:24 pm (UTC)(link)
LOLOLOLOOOOOOL yes. :PP And remember our ever-reliable Wilhelmine's anecdote about FW trying to cheat on his wife at one point, but his intended mistress punching him in the face and giving him a bloody nose instead? Man, I hope that really happened. Wallop him a good one for all of us, Frau von Pannewitz!

If we're talking pseudo-royals, i.e., Stuarts in exile, it's been 15+ years since I read up on them, but I don't *remember* James Francis or Charles Edward being unfaithful to their spouses. I may just be forgetting, but what I remember is Charles being abusive*, and his wife having a lover and eventually leaving him. I can name two of his acknowledged mistresses, but both of them were before he married (which was a relatively short-lived marriage late in life). And James's life I knew much less well even when I was up on the Stuarts, so for all I know he had 10 mistresses I'm forgetting about, but I don't remember it.

* And possessive, including stringing bells up on chairs around their bed so he could tell if she was sneaking out at night.

At any rate, if I'm remembering correctly, Charles's is certainly another case where sexual fidelity =/= successful marriage.

Fritz himself, of course, may have met the "18th century monarch not cheating on his wife" criterion on a technicality, but only if he literally never had sex inside or outside of his marriage, which is unknowable (and doubtful, imo). :P

I agree all these examples illustrate the limitations of sexual fidelity as a signifier of a good marriage or lack thereof. ;)